Literature DB >> 27007947

Comparison of Resting Energy Expenditure Between Cancer Subjects and Healthy Controls: A Meta-Analysis.

Thi Yen Vi Nguyen1, Marijka J Batterham2, Cheree Edwards1.   

Abstract

There is conflicting evidence surrounding the extent of changes in resting energy expenditure (REE) in cancer. This meta-analysis aimed to establish the mean difference in REE, as kilojoules per kilogram fat-free mass, among cancer patients when compared to healthy control subjects. The secondary aim was to determine differences among different cancer types. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science, Wiley Online Library, and ProQuest Central were searched from the earliest records until March 2014. Studies were included if measured REE was reported as kilojoules or kilocalories per kilogram fat-free mass (FFM) in adult subjects with cancer. Twenty-seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. Fourteen studies included both cancer (n = 1453) and control (n = 1145) groups. The meta-analysis shows an average increase in REE of 9.66 (95% confidence interval: 3.34, 15.98) kJ/kgFFM/day in cancer patients when compared to control subjects. Heterogeneity was detected (P < 0.001) which suggest variations in REE among cancer types. Elevations are most noticeable in patients with cancers of metabolically demanding organs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27007947     DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2016.1153667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Cancer        ISSN: 0163-5581            Impact factor:   2.900


  7 in total

1.  Body Composition, Resting Energy Expenditure, and Metabolic Changes in Women Diagnosed with Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma.

Authors:  Elena Izkhakov; Nachum Vaisman; Sophie Barnes; Micha Barchana; Naftali Stern; Lital Keinan-Boker
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 6.568

2.  A novel perspective suggesting high sustained energy expenditure may be net protective against cancer.

Authors:  Peter A Biro; Frédéric Thomas; Beata Ujvari; Christa Beckmann
Journal:  Evol Med Public Health       Date:  2022-04-13

Review 3.  Energy Metabolism in Gynecological Cancers: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ana Paula Pagano; Katherine L Ford; Kathryn N Porter Starr; Nicole Kiss; Helen Steed; Janice Y Kung; Rajavel Elango; Carla M Prado
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Perspective: Towards Personalised Metabolic Coaching in Cancer.

Authors:  T Van Soom; W Tjalma; S El Bakkali; H Verbelen; N Gebruers; E van Breda
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2018-09

5.  Heterogeneity of endometriosis lesions requires individualisation of diagnosis and treatment and a different approach to research and evidence based medicine.

Authors:  P R Koninckx; A Ussia; L Adamyan; A Wattiez; V Gomel; D C Martin
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2019-03

Review 6.  Determining the factors affecting energy metabolism and energy requirement in cancer patients.

Authors:  Tuğçe Bulmuş Tüccar; Nilüfer Acar Tek
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 7.  A review of nutrition and dietary interventions in oncology.

Authors:  Ashley Gray; Brian N Dang; Theodore B Moore; Roger Clemens; Peter Pressman
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2020-06-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.