| Literature DB >> 27007108 |
Eddy Fan1,2, Luciano Gattinoni3, Alain Combes4, Matthieu Schmidt4, Giles Peek5, Dan Brodie6, Thomas Muller7, Andrea Morelli8, V Marco Ranieri8, Antonio Pesenti3, Laurent Brochard9,10, Carol Hodgson11, Cecile Van Kiersbilck12, Antoine Roch13, Michael Quintel14, Laurent Papazian13.
Abstract
Despite expensive life-sustaining interventions delivered in the ICU, mortality and morbidity in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) remain unacceptably high. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has emerged as a promising intervention that may provide more efficacious supportive care to these patients. Improvements in technology have made ECMO safer and easier to use, allowing for the potential of more widespread application in patients with ARF. A greater appreciation of the complications associated with the placement of an artificial airway and mechanical ventilation has led clinicians and researchers to seek viable alternatives to providing supportive care in these patients. Thus, this review will summarize the current knowledge regarding the use of venovenous (VV)-ECMO for ARF and describe some of the recent controversies in the field, such as mechanical ventilation, anticoagulation and transfusion therapy, and ethical concerns in patients supported with VV-ECMO.Entities:
Keywords: Critical care; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Intensive care units; Respiratory distress syndrome, adult; Respiratory failure; Review; Ventilation, artificial
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27007108 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-016-4314-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intensive Care Med ISSN: 0342-4642 Impact factor: 17.440