Literature DB >> 27006788

Symmetry reduction due to gallium substitution in the garnet Li6.43(2)Ga0.52(3)La2.67(4)Zr2O12.

Lars Robben1, Elena Merzlyakova2, Paul Heitjans2, Thorsten M Gesing1.   

Abstract

Single-crystal structure refinements on lithium lanthanum zirconate (LLZO; Li7La3Zr2O12) substituted with gallium were successfully carried out in the cubic symmetry space group I [Formula: see text]3d. Gallium was found on two lithium sites as well as on the lanthanum position. Due to the structural distortion of the resulting Li6.43(2)Ga0.52(3)La2.67(4)Zr2O12 (Ga-LLZO) single crystals, a reduction of the LLZO cubic garnet symmetry from Ia[Formula: see text] d to I [Formula: see text]3d was necessary, which could hardly be analysed from X-ray powder diffraction data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crystal structure; garnet; lithium lanthanum zirconate (LLZO); symmetry reduction

Year:  2016        PMID: 27006788      PMCID: PMC4778807          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016001924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Garnets can be described with the ideal formula A 3 B 2(XO4)3 in space group Ia d, with different coordination polyhedra of the respective elements with oxygen, resulting in a distorted cube for A (e.g. Ca), an octa­hedron for B (e.g. Al) and a tetra­hedron for X (e.g. Si). The variability of the elements on the crystallographic sites (thereby keeping the high symmetry) gives rise to inter­esting material properties like ferrimagnetism (Geller, 1967 ▸). In recent years, garnet-type compounds containing Li have gained considerable inter­est as promising electrolyte materials for all-solid-state Li-ion batteries. The so-called ‘Li-stuffed’ garnets, which contain more Li than available on tetra­hedral sites (X), meaning that excess Li occupies other sites as well, show an increase in Li-ion mobility. An exhaustive overview of these compounds was recently given by Thangadurai et al. (2014 ▸). The garnet-type fast lithium ion conductor Li7La3Zr2O12, abbreviated as LLZO, is such an ‘Li-stuffed’ garnet. Awaka et al. (2009 ▸) described the crystal structure of pure LLZO at ambient conditions in space group I41/acd. Even a small amount of Al in the structure (Al-LLZO) stabilizes the cubic garnet symmetry described in space group Ia d by Geiger et al. (2011 ▸). These authors reported that Al could be found on two different tetra­hedral sites using 27Al MAS NMR spectroscopy but a final analysis was not possible due to the minor Al content. Rettenwander et al. (2014 ▸) reported on 71Ga MAS NMR spectroscopy measurements on gallium substituted Li7-3GaLa3Zr2O12 (GaLLZO) indicating a fourfold coordination of the gallium atoms. The authors excluded the presence of Ga at the 24d position (Ia d) and assumed that the local symmetry could be lower than indicated by diffraction methods. In principle, the following exchanges are possible: (i) 3 Li+ ↔ Ga3+ + 2 voids, which is the most probable one and yields a good explanation for the higher conductivity due to the higher lithium atom jump probability to empty positions as discussed (Rettenwander et al., 2014 ▸); (ii) La3+Ga3+, a valence-neutral exchange which should lead to a dynamical disorder of the gallium atoms in order to lower the coordination number and shorten the Ga—O bond lengths for bond-valence balance, taking the different radii into account. The valence-neutral exchange should finally lead to higher displacement parameters of the atoms on the lanthanum position compared to that of the lighter zirconium atoms. (iii) Zr4+ ↔ Ga3+ + Li+, which needs slightly more lithium for charge balance and could therefore be of minor probability.

Structural commentary

The unit cell of the obtained single crystals could be well indexed using a body-centered cubic lattice with lattice parameter a = 12.9681 (15) Å. The space group determination with XPREP (Bruker, 2014 ▸) leads at once to the highest possible space group Ia d. However, a satisfactory structure solution or refinement with published structural data (Geiger et al., 2011 ▸) in this space group type was not possible. Consequently, structure solutions by charge flipping (Bruker, 2009 ▸) were tried in all possible subgroups of Ia d and the lowest R-values were obtained for the charge-flipping run in space group I 3d. Subsequent refinements lead to the present structure model and clearly indicate the substitution of Ga3+ on the former 24c La3+ site as well as 24d Li+ site in the aristotype in space group Ia d. The latter site splits into two sites due to the symmetry reduction as indicated by the Bärnighausen tree (Bärnig­hausen, 1980 ▸) given in Fig. 1 ▸. The deviation from six symmetry-equivalent Zr—O distances in LLZO (Ia d) results in a distortion of the ZrO6 octa­hedron with Zr—O distances of 3 × 2.095 (2) and 3 × 2.113 (2) Å in GaLLZO. Another significant reduction of the highest possible symmetry for LLZO is the distortion of the eightfold coordinate La position (Fig. 2 ▸), for which distances between 2.496 (2) and 2.595 (2) Å are found in GaLLZO. This distortion results from the splitting of the 96h position of the oxygen atom in Ia d into two 48e positions in I 3d (Fig. 1 ▸). Because the two lithium positions (Li22 and Li32) occupied by gallium are in principle identical to those positions of the higher symmetry structure (but with slightly shorter bond length due to the gallium substitution, viz. 4 × 1.916 (1) Å in LLZO and 4 × 1.908 (2) Å in GaLLZO), and the Li1 and Li2 positions are not occupied by gallium, the symmetry reduction is a confirmation of gallium atoms to be found also on the lanthanum position. This is also supported by the higher displacement parameter of the La site compared to the Zr site, as explained previously.
Figure 1

Bärnighausen tree (Bärnighausen, 1980 ▸) of the group–subgroup relation between cubic LLZO and the symmetry-reduced cubic Ga–LLZO.

Figure 2

Crystal structure of Li6.43(2)Ga0.52(3)La2.67(4)Zr2O12 (Ga–LLZO) with all possible atom positions between the ZrO6 octa­hedra (bottom) and the atom position specific coordination polyhedra (top). Displacement ellipsoids (top) are given at the 50% probability level.

Synthesis and crystallization

The synthesis was configured to yield a compound with nominal composition Li6.25Ga0.25La3Zr2O12. 2 g of a stoichiometric mixture of the pre-dried (30 h at 373 K in vacuum) educts Li2O (with an excess of 10%wt to compensate the lithium loss due to thermal treatment), La2O3, ZrO2 and Ga2O3 was weighted into a WC milling beaker (45 ml, 100 WC milling balls of 5 mm diameter, Fritsch, Germany) under inert conditions (glovebox) and high-energy ball-milled in a planetary ball mill (Pulverisette 7 premium line, Fritsch, Germany) under argon atmosphere for 8 h at a rotational speed of 10 s−1 as reported previously (Düvel et al., 2012 ▸) for Al-substituted LLZO. The obtained powder was pressed to a pellet using a uniaxial pressure of 0.8 GPa. A stack of three pellets was placed on a platinum ring seated on a corundum plate, covered with a corundum crucible and heated for 12 h at 1323 K in a muffle furnace before cooling to room-temperature. The middle pellet from the stack had smooth green color and showed visible grains. The surface of the pellet was grey and brittle and consisted mainly of lanthanum zirconates due to Li loss. From this pellet single crystals were extracted using a polarization microscope. Rietveld refinement of X-ray powder diffraction data of the green product shows a mixture of 96.8 (9)%wt cubic garnet-type GaLLZO and 3.2 (9)%wt Li2ZrO3 with a lattice parameter of a = 12.9738 (19) Å for its garnet-type structure. Energy dispersive X-ray analysis of the single crystal gave a tentative formula of Li6.5 (1)Ga0.5 (1)La2.8 (1)Zr2.0 (1)O12, in good agreement with the refined formula Li6.43 (2)Ga0.52 (3)La2.67 (4)Zr2O12 determined from single crystal X-ray diffraction data.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 1 ▸. Structure refinement was carried out as a two-component (merohedral) twin. Sites showing a statistical occupancy were constrained with respect to positions and anisotropic displacement parameters. An independent refinement of the anisotropic displacement parameters of Ga and Li on the Ga2/Li22 and Ga3/Li33 sites was not possible, although the reflection-to-parameter ratio is rather high. To ensure charge neutrality during the refinement of the Ga and Li occupancies on the Ga2/Li22 and Ga3/Li33 sites, the occupancies were restrained to exchange three Li atoms against one Ga atom.
Table 1

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaLi6.43Ga0.52La2.67Zr2O12
M r 826.20
Crystal system, space groupCubic, I 3d
Temperature (K)301
a (Å)12.9681 (15)
V3)2180.9 (8)
Z 8
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)13.41
Crystal size (mm)0.25 × 0.15 × 0.13
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2014)
T min, T max 0.495, 0.754
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections472450, 3678, 3508
R int 0.046
(sin θ/λ)max−1)1.340
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.026, 0.056, 1.46
No. of reflections3678
No. of parameters50
No. of restraints3
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)2.08, −1.91
Absolute structureFlack x determined using 1493 quotients [(I +)−(I )]/[(I +)+(I )] (Parsons et al., 2013)
Absolute structure parameter0.045 (9)

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2014 ▸), TOPAS (Bruker, 2009 ▸), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999 ▸) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016001924/wm5261sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016001924/wm5261Isup2.hkl CCDC reference: 1451178 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
Li6.43Ga0.52La2.67Zr2O12Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Mr = 826.20Cell parameters from 9913 reflections
Cubic, I43dθ = 3.1–72.3°
a = 12.9681 (15) ŵ = 13.41 mm1
V = 2180.9 (8) Å3T = 301 K
Z = 8Irregular, green
F(000) = 3400.25 × 0.15 × 0.13 mm
Dx = 5.033 Mg m3
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer3508 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
φ and ω scansRint = 0.046
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2014)θmax = 72.3°, θmin = 2.2°
Tmin = 0.495, Tmax = 0.754h = −34→34
472450 measured reflectionsk = −34→34
3678 independent reflectionsl = −34→34
Refinement on F2w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.011P)2 + 8.6617P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
Least-squares matrix: full(Δ/σ)max = 0.049
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.026Δρmax = 2.08 e Å3
wR(F2) = 0.056Δρmin = −1.91 e Å3
S = 1.46Extinction correction: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
3678 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack x determined using 1493 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013)
50 parametersAbsolute structure parameter: 0.045 (9)
3 restraints
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refined as a 2-component twin.
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
La10.62292 (2)0.00000.25000.00746 (2)0.889 (4)
Ga10.62292 (2)0.00000.25000.00746 (2)0.111 (4)
Zr10.25005 (2)0.25005 (2)0.25005 (2)0.00552 (4)
O10.19586 (18)0.28163 (18)0.10116 (16)0.0118 (3)
O20.46910 (17)0.55410 (17)0.65064 (16)0.0114 (2)
Li10.428 (3)0.593 (2)0.813 (2)0.029 (5)0.33333 (14)
Li20.642 (3)0.178 (2)0.065 (2)0.029 (5)0.33333 (14)
Ga20.37500.50000.75000.0061 (4)0.0857 (12)
Li220.37500.50000.75000.0061 (4)0.743 (4)
Ga30.25000.37500.00000.0110 (9)0.0403 (12)
Li320.25000.37500.00000.0110 (9)0.879 (4)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
La10.00912 (4)0.00656 (5)0.00668 (5)0.0000.000−0.00141 (3)
Ga10.00912 (4)0.00656 (5)0.00668 (5)0.0000.000−0.00141 (3)
Zr10.00552 (4)0.00552 (4)0.00552 (4)0.00021 (3)0.00021 (3)0.00021 (3)
O10.0129 (6)0.0138 (6)0.0087 (5)0.0014 (5)−0.0007 (5)0.0006 (5)
O20.0131 (6)0.0116 (6)0.0096 (5)0.0010 (5)0.0000 (5)−0.0013 (4)
Li10.051 (15)0.015 (6)0.022 (6)−0.013 (9)−0.013 (8)0.006 (6)
Li20.051 (15)0.015 (6)0.022 (6)−0.013 (9)−0.013 (8)0.006 (6)
Ga20.0078 (10)0.0052 (6)0.0052 (6)0.0000.0000.000
Li220.0078 (10)0.0052 (6)0.0052 (6)0.0000.0000.000
Ga30.0100 (14)0.013 (2)0.0100 (14)0.0000.0000.000
Li320.0100 (14)0.013 (2)0.0100 (14)0.0000.0000.000
La1—O1i2.496 (2)O2—Li2xxiii2.09 (3)
La1—O1ii2.496 (2)O2—Zr1xxiv2.113 (2)
La1—O2iii2.520 (2)O2—Li12.23 (4)
La1—O2iv2.520 (2)O2—La1xxv2.520 (2)
La1—O2v2.590 (2)O2—Li2xxvi2.54 (3)
La1—O2vi2.590 (2)O2—La1xxiii2.590 (2)
La1—O1vii2.595 (2)O2—Li2xxvii2.61 (4)
La1—O1viii2.595 (2)Li1—O2xxviii1.91 (4)
Zr1—O1ix2.095 (2)Li1—O2xxii2.04 (3)
Zr1—O1x2.095 (2)Li1—O1xxix2.16 (3)
Zr1—O12.095 (2)Li1—O1xxx2.65 (3)
Zr1—O2xi2.113 (2)Li2—O1viii1.90 (3)
Zr1—O2xii2.113 (2)Li2—O2vi2.09 (3)
Zr1—O2xiii2.113 (2)Li2—O1xvi2.22 (4)
O1—Li2xiv1.90 (3)Li2—O1xxxi2.32 (3)
O1—Ga31.918 (2)Li2—O2xxxii2.54 (3)
O1—Li1xv2.16 (3)Li2—O2xxxiii2.61 (4)
O1—Li2xvi2.22 (4)Li2—Li2xxxiv2.68 (6)
O1—Li2xvii2.32 (3)Ga2—O2xxi1.908 (2)
O1—La1xviii2.496 (2)Ga2—O2xxii1.908 (2)
O1—La1xix2.595 (2)Ga2—O2xxviii1.908 (2)
O1—Li1xx2.65 (3)Ga3—O1xxxv1.918 (2)
O2—Ga21.908 (2)Ga3—O1xxxvi1.918 (2)
O2—Li1xxi1.91 (4)Ga3—O1xxxvii1.918 (2)
O2—Li1xxii2.04 (3)
O1i—La1—O1ii73.18 (10)La1xviii—O1—Li1xx79.5 (6)
O1i—La1—O2iii160.55 (5)La1xix—O1—Li1xx68.9 (8)
O1ii—La1—O2iii111.27 (5)Ga2—O2—Li1xxi49.8 (10)
O1i—La1—O2iv111.27 (5)Ga2—O2—Li1xxii48.0 (8)
O1ii—La1—O2iv160.55 (5)Li1xxi—O2—Li1xxii77.4 (11)
O2iii—La1—O2iv71.21 (10)Ga2—O2—Li2xxiii66.9 (11)
O1i—La1—O2v73.18 (7)Li1xxi—O2—Li2xxiii18.2 (10)
O1ii—La1—O2v95.73 (8)Li1xxii—O2—Li2xxiii85.1 (16)
O2iii—La1—O2v123.67 (5)Ga2—O2—Zr1xxiv128.57 (12)
O2iv—La1—O2v68.75 (9)Li1xxi—O2—Zr1xxiv104.4 (9)
O1i—La1—O2vi95.73 (8)Li1xxii—O2—Zr1xxiv87.4 (8)
O1ii—La1—O2vi73.18 (7)Li2xxiii—O2—Zr1xxiv88.5 (10)
O2iii—La1—O2vi68.75 (9)Ga2—O2—Li144.9 (8)
O2iv—La1—O2vi123.67 (5)Li1xxi—O2—Li172.9 (12)
O2v—La1—O2vi166.44 (9)Li1xxii—O2—Li185.9 (12)
O1i—La1—O1vii125.03 (5)Li2xxiii—O2—Li189.7 (13)
O1ii—La1—O1vii68.53 (9)Zr1xxiv—O2—Li1173.2 (7)
O2iii—La1—O1vii72.72 (6)Ga2—O2—La1xxv94.15 (8)
O2iv—La1—O1vii94.96 (7)Li1xxi—O2—La1xxv143.6 (9)
O2v—La1—O1vii73.07 (5)Li1xxii—O2—La1xxv80.5 (11)
O2vi—La1—O1vii108.77 (5)Li2xxiii—O2—La1xxv161.0 (11)
O1i—La1—O1viii68.53 (9)Zr1xxiv—O2—La1xxv103.05 (9)
O1ii—La1—O1viii125.03 (5)Li1—O2—La1xxv77.0 (9)
O2iii—La1—O1viii94.96 (7)Ga2—O2—Li2xxvi57.6 (8)
O2iv—La1—O1viii72.72 (6)Li1xxi—O2—Li2xxvi76.3 (11)
O2v—La1—O1viii108.77 (5)Li1xxii—O2—Li2xxvi99.9 (14)
O2vi—La1—O1viii73.07 (5)Li2xxiii—O2—Li2xxvi91.0 (11)
O1vii—La1—O1viii165.12 (9)Zr1xxiv—O2—Li2xxvi172.6 (9)
O1ix—Zr1—O1x86.37 (10)Li1—O2—Li2xxvi14.0 (8)
O1ix—Zr1—O186.37 (10)La1xxv—O2—Li2xxvi79.4 (7)
O1x—Zr1—O186.37 (10)Ga2—O2—La1xxiii122.63 (10)
O1ix—Zr1—O2xi93.51 (9)Li1xxi—O2—La1xxiii95.8 (10)
O1x—Zr1—O2xi179.59 (11)Li1xxii—O2—La1xxiii170.6 (8)
O1—Zr1—O2xi94.02 (9)Li2xxiii—O2—La1xxiii90.4 (8)
O1ix—Zr1—O2xii94.02 (9)Zr1xxiv—O2—La1xxiii100.77 (8)
O1x—Zr1—O2xii93.51 (9)Li1—O2—La1xxiii85.8 (7)
O1—Zr1—O2xii179.59 (11)La1xxv—O2—La1xxiii101.98 (8)
O2xi—Zr1—O2xii86.10 (9)Li2xxvi—O2—La1xxiii71.8 (9)
O1ix—Zr1—O2xiii179.59 (11)Ga2—O2—Li2xxvii56.1 (7)
O1x—Zr1—O2xiii94.02 (9)Li1xxi—O2—Li2xxvii83.4 (14)
O1—Zr1—O2xiii93.51 (9)Li1xxii—O2—Li2xxvii8.2 (9)
O2xi—Zr1—O2xiii86.10 (9)Li2xxiii—O2—Li2xxvii89.2 (9)
O2xii—Zr1—O2xiii86.10 (9)Zr1xxiv—O2—Li2xxvii80.4 (7)
Li2xiv—O1—Ga355.1 (12)Li1—O2—Li2xxvii93.0 (11)
Li2xiv—O1—Zr1100.2 (12)La1xxv—O2—Li2xxvii78.2 (6)
Ga3—O1—Zr1129.12 (12)Li2xxvi—O2—Li2xxvii107.0 (12)
Li2xiv—O1—Li1xv17.3 (11)La1xxiii—O2—Li2xxvii178.8 (7)
Ga3—O1—Li1xv71.3 (8)O2xxviii—Li1—O2xxii108.5 (14)
Zr1—O1—Li1xv84.8 (8)O2xxviii—Li1—O1xxix98.6 (18)
Li2xiv—O1—Li2xvi80.8 (13)O2xxii—Li1—O1xxix93.9 (12)
Ga3—O1—Li2xvi50.0 (9)O2xxviii—Li1—O2101.2 (12)
Zr1—O1—Li2xvi85.8 (9)O2xxii—Li1—O286.8 (14)
Li1xv—O1—Li2xvi87.3 (14)O1xxix—Li1—O2158.9 (18)
Li2xiv—O1—Li2xvii78.1 (15)O2xxviii—Li1—O1xxx144.7 (15)
Ga3—O1—Li2xvii48.2 (10)O2xxii—Li1—O1xxx106.5 (15)
Zr1—O1—Li2xvii177.3 (10)O1xxix—Li1—O1xxx83.1 (9)
Li1xv—O1—Li2xvii93.8 (10)O2—Li1—O1xxx76.4 (12)
Li2xvi—O1—Li2xvii91.8 (16)O1viii—Li2—O2vi101.0 (12)
Li2xiv—O1—La1xviii147.5 (13)O1viii—Li2—O1xvi102.1 (17)
Ga3—O1—La1xviii92.55 (8)O2vi—Li2—O1xvi91.1 (12)
Zr1—O1—La1xviii103.48 (9)O1viii—Li2—O1xxxi98.5 (14)
Li1xv—O1—La1xviii163.4 (9)O2vi—Li2—O1xxxi160.3 (14)
Li2xvi—O1—La1xviii79.1 (7)O1xvi—Li2—O1xxxi82.0 (13)
Li2xvii—O1—La1xviii77.3 (7)O1viii—Li2—O2xxxii151.8 (19)
Li2xiv—O1—La1xix94.7 (9)O2vi—Li2—O2xxxii86.9 (13)
Ga3—O1—La1xix123.13 (10)O1xvi—Li2—O2xxxii104.8 (10)
Zr1—O1—La1xix100.26 (9)O1viii—Li2—O2xxxiii84.1 (12)
Li1xv—O1—La1xix89.9 (10)O2vi—Li2—O2xxxiii85.2 (14)
Li2xvi—O1—La1xix173.1 (9)O1xvi—Li2—O2xxxiii173.3 (16)
Li2xvii—O1—La1xix82.1 (10)O1xxxi—Li2—O2xxxiii99.7 (11)
La1xviii—O1—La1xix102.50 (8)O2xxxii—Li2—O2xxxiii69.5 (10)
Li2xiv—O1—Li1xx81.4 (12)O2xxi—Ga2—O2xxii114.14 (7)
Ga3—O1—Li1xx60.5 (8)O2xxi—Ga2—O2xxviii100.49 (13)
Zr1—O1—Li1xx169.2 (8)O2xxii—Ga2—O2xxviii114.14 (7)
Li1xv—O1—Li1xx95.1 (9)O1—Ga3—O1xxxv113.48 (7)
Li2xvi—O1—Li1xx105.0 (14)O1—Ga3—O1xxxvi101.73 (14)
Li2xvii—O1—Li1xx13.3 (11)O1xxxv—Ga3—O1xxxvi113.48 (7)
  5 in total

1.  Crystal chemistry and stability of "Li7La3Zr2O12" garnet: a fast lithium-ion conductor.

Authors:  Charles A Geiger; Evgeny Alekseev; Biljana Lazic; Martin Fisch; Thomas Armbruster; Ramona Langner; Michael Fechtelkord; Namjun Kim; Thomas Pettke; Werner Weppner
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 5.165

2.  Garnet-type solid-state fast Li ion conductors for Li batteries: critical review.

Authors:  Venkataraman Thangadurai; Sumaletha Narayanan; Dana Pinzaru
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 54.564

3.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

4.  Use of intensity quotients and differences in absolute structure refinement.

Authors:  Simon Parsons; Howard D Flack; Trixie Wagner
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2013-05-17

5.  A synthesis and crystal chemical study of the fast ion conductor Li(7-3x)Ga(x)La3 Zr2O12 with x = 0.08 to 0.84.

Authors:  Daniel Rettenwander; Charles A Geiger; Martina Tribus; Peter Tropper; Georg Amthauer
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 5.165

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Garnet to hydrogarnet: effect of post synthesis treatment on cation substituted LLZO solid electrolyte and its effect on Li ion conductivity.

Authors:  Charlotte Fritsch; Tatiana Zinkevich; Sylvio Indris; Martin Etter; Volodymyr Baran; Thomas Bergfeldt; Michael Knapp; Helmut Ehrenberg; Anna-Lena Hansen
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 4.036

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.