Literature DB >> 27006295

Surgical and Audiologic Outcomes in Endoscopic Stapes Surgery across 4 Institutions.

Jacob B Hunter1, M Geraldine Zuniga1, Janaina Leite2, Daniel Killeen3, Cameron Wick3, Julian Ramirez4, Jose A Rivas4, Joao F Nogueira2, Brandon Isaacson3, Alejandro Rivas5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate intra- and postoperative outcomes of endoscopic stapes surgery. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series with chart review.
SETTING: Four tertiary care otologic centers. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Sixty-five subjects 18 years and older who underwent endoscopic stapes surgeries were analyzed. Variables analyzed included surgical techniques and intraoperative findings. Outcomes measured included postoperative hearing and complications to date.
RESULTS: Fifty-one patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The average patient age was 48.1 years (range, 26-87 years), with 60.0% female patients. Patients had a median follow-up of 5.13 months (range, 0.8-57.4 months). Of the subjects, 71.7% required scutum removal. The chorda tympani nerve was manipulated in 94.0% of subjects and transected in 12.0%. At last follow-up visit, the median air-bone gap decreased from 34.5 dB hearing level (HL) preoperatively to 9.0 dB HL postoperatively (P < .0001). Ninety percent of subjects had closure of their air-bone gap ≤20 dB HL. Intraoperative complications included tympanic membrane tears in 8.0% of subjects, all of which resolved at first follow-up. Postoperatively, 10.0% of subjects complained of altered taste.
CONCLUSIONS: The present multicentered study of endoscopic stapes surgery demonstrates similar audiometric and postoperative outcomes previously published in the literature, with a median postoperative air-bone gap of 9.0 dB HL. Future prospective endoscopic stapes surgery studies, addressing the need for scutum removal, postoperative taste changes, and pain scores, are merited. © American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endoscopic; stapedectomy; stapedotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27006295     DOI: 10.1177/0194599816633654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  6 in total

1.  A modified method of local infiltration for endoscopic stapes surgery: how I do it.

Authors:  Arnulfo Cornejo-Suarez; Maria Estela Chavez-Delgado; Ramon Perez-Ramirez; Isaac Montoya-Hernandez; Jose Regino Montoya-Valdez; Carlos Silvino Rosales-Orozco; Luis Humberto Govea-Camacho
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Does endoscopic stapedotomy increase hearing restoration rates comparing to microscopic? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tsetsos Nikolaos; Tsentemeidou Aikaterini; Daskalakis Dimitrios; Blioskas Sarantis; Goudakos John; Tzoi Eleana; Markou Konstantinos
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Primary endoscopic stapedotomy using 3 mm nasal endoscope: Audiologic and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Pradeep Pradhan; Chappity Preetam; Pradipta Kumar Parida
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2020-07-02

4.  Adaptation of the Standardized Hearing Outcomes Scattergram to Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Perkins; Nauman F Manzoor; David S Haynes; Matthew O'Malley; René Gifford; Alejandro Rivas
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Comparison of endoscopic underlay and over-under tympanoplasty techniques for type I tympanoplasty.

Authors:  James W Bao; Kevin Y Zhan; Cameron C Wick
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-25

Review 6.  Endoscopic ear surgery.

Authors:  Ismet Emrah Emre; Cemal Cingi; Nuray Bayar Muluk; João Flávio Nogueira
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2019-12-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.