Literature DB >> 27005978

Durability of bioprostheses for the tricuspid valve in patients with congenital heart disease.

Melchior Burri1, Manfred O Vogt2, Jürgen Hörer3,4, Julie Cleuziou3, Jelena Kasnar-Samprec3, Andreas Kühn2, Rüdiger Lange3,5, Christian Schreiber3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Only little data exist on the durability of bioprostheses in the tricuspid position in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). The aim of the study was to determine the reoperation rate and the valve function after primary implantation.
METHODS: Between 1990 and 2013, 51 patients with CHD underwent tricuspid valve (TV) replacement with a bioprosthesis. The median age at operation was 32 years (range: 8-69). The underlying morphology was Ebstein's anomaly in 62% of the patients. Implanted valves included 38 pericardial and 13 porcine valves. All available echocardiographic examinations (n = 714) and clinical data were retrospectively reviewed. Dysfunction was defined as an at least moderate regurgitation or a mean diastolic gradient ≥9 mmHg. Freedom from death, reoperation and prosthetic valve dysfunction was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate was 9%. The estimated survival rate was 86% at one and 80% at ten years. The freedom from reoperation at 1, 5 and 10 years was 100, 86 and 81%, and that from prosthesis dysfunction detected by echocardiography at 1, 5 and 10 years was 89, 66 and 58%, respectively. The main reason for dysfunction was insufficiency (89%). Valve implantation at an age below 16 years was associated with earlier reoperation and dysfunction (the 5-year freedom rate from reoperation/dysfunction was 70%/30% compared with 89%/78% in the rest of the patients, P = 0.016/0.0009).
CONCLUSIONS: Serial echocardiography shows a high rate of dysfunction of TV bioprosthesis in patients with CHD, which already occurred a few years after implantation. In patients below 16 years of age, most prostheses are dysfunctional within 5 years.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioprosthetic; Congenital heart disease; Heart valve prosthesis; Tricuspid valve

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27005978     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  4 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous tricuspid valve implantation in failing bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Andreas Eicken; Peter Ewert
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-12

2.  The ideal substitute for tricuspid valve replacement in patients with congenital heart disease: an unsolved dilemma.

Authors:  Andrea Garatti; Alessandro Giamberti; Alessandro Frigiola; Lorenzo Menicanti
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2017-04

3.  Bloody tricuspid stenosis: case report of an uncommon cause of haemoptysis.

Authors:  Filippo Trombara; Marco Bergonti; Olga Toscano; Alessia Dalla Cia; Emilio M Assanelli; Gianluca Polvani; Antonio L Bartorelli
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2021-01-05

4.  The better substitute for tricuspid valve replacement in patients with severe isolated tricuspid regurgitation.

Authors:  Weitao Liang; Honghua Yue; Tao Li; Xiaoli Qin; Yongjun Qian; Zhong Wu
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.596

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.