| Literature DB >> 27005658 |
Hamish Michael Evans1, Peter Ranald Charles Howe2, Rachel Heloise Xiwen Wong3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This methodological paper presents both a scientific rationale and a methodological approach for investigating the effects of resveratrol supplementation on mood and cognitive performance in postmenopausal women. Postmenopausal women have an increased risk of cognitive decline and dementia, which may be at least partly due to loss of beneficial effects of estrogen on the cerebrovasculature. We hypothesise that resveratrol, a phytoestrogen, may counteract this risk by enhancing cerebrovascular function and improving regional blood flow in response to cognitive demands. A clinical trial was designed to test this hypothesis.Entities:
Keywords: cerebrovascular function; cognition; healthy ageing; mood; physical function; postmenopausal; resveratrol; transcranial Doppler ultrasound; vasoactive nutrients
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27005658 PMCID: PMC4808879 DOI: 10.3390/nu8030150
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Eligibility criteria for the study.
| Inclusion Criteria |
|---|
Aged 45–85 years Postmenopausal (self-reported cessation of menses for more than 6 months) Stable current medication (unlikely to change for duration of the study) |
| Exclusion criteria |
Currently taking HRT or alternative hormone therapy for the relief of postmenopausal symptoms or have done so in the last 6 months Breast or cervical cancer Other serious disease, such as cardiovascular disease, other cancer, kidney or liver disease or neurologic condition Smokers or currently on nicotine therapy Using insulin or warfarin therapy Clinically significant depression Currently consuming more than 4 alcoholic beverages a day Changed medication in the 3 months prior to study enrolment Clinic BP > 160/100 mmhg (determined at screening) Suspected dementia (determined at screening) |
Figure 1Consort diagram for study participants.
Components of the Neuropsychological test battery.
| Cognitive Test & Domains | Procedure | Scoring |
|---|---|---|
| Scaled scores = raw scores − errors | ||
| Learning = scaled total (Trials A1-A5). | ||
| Proactive memory = scaled Trial B6. | ||
| Retroactive interference = scaled trial A7-scaled trial A5. | ||
| For each trial, number of errors was also recorded. | ||
| Delayed recall = scaled trial A8. | ||
| Recognition = Z-score list A + Z-score list B + Z-score Errors | ||
| Number of correct responses overall. | ||
| As per category fluency. | ||
| As per category fluency. | ||
| As per category fluency. | ||
| As per category fluency. | ||
| 14 different objects were used in this task. For each task, a random number of objects (max = 5) displayed in random positions on 4 × 4 grid. Participants were prompted to either recall positions (point to position of each object in the order they were presented) or positions and names (point to the position of each object in the order they were presented saying the name of each object verbally) in an empty grid after a 5 s delay. | “Positions” = number of each correct position in order. | |
| “Position and names” as per “positions” with an additional mark for each correct name in order. | ||
| Marks were then tallied for an overall score. | ||
| Trial A and B = Time taken, errors | ||
| Interference = time taken (trial B/Trial A) |