| Literature DB >> 27005597 |
Dan Gao1,2, Ling-Na Zeng3, Pin Zhang4, Zhi-Jie Ma5, Rui-Sheng Li6, Yan-Ling Zhao7, Ya-Ming Zhang8, Yu-Min Guo9, Ming Niu10, Zhao-Fang Bai11, Xiao-He Xiao12, Wei-Wei Gao13, Jia-Bo Wang14.
Abstract
Mercury (Hg) causes severe nephrotoxicity in subjects with excess exposure. This work attempted to identify whether a natural medicine--rhubarb--has protective effects against mercuric chloride (HgCl₂)-induced acute renal failure (ARF), and which of its components contributed most to the treatment. Total rhubarb extract (TR) were separated to the total anthraquinones (TA), the total tannins (TT) and remaining component extract (RC). Each extract was orally pre-administered to rats for five successive days followed by HgCl₂ injection to induce kidney injury. Subsequently, renal histopathology and biochemical examinations were performed in vitro to evaluate the protective effects. Pharmacological studies showed that TR and TA, but not TT or RC manifested significant protection activity against HgCl₂-induced ARF. There were also significant declines of serum creatine, urea nitrogen values and increases of total protein albumin levels in TR and TA treated groups compared to HgCl₂ alone (p < 0.05). At last, the major components in TA extract were further identified as anthraquinones by liquid chromatography coupled mass spectroscopy. This study thus provides observational evidences that rhubarb could ameliorate HgCl₂-induced ARF and its anthraquinones in particular are the effective components responsible for this activity in rhubarb extract.Entities:
Keywords: acute renal failure; anthraquinones; mercury; protection; rhubarb
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27005597 PMCID: PMC6272827 DOI: 10.3390/molecules21030298
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Rhubarb extract protects against body weight and urine volume declines induced by HgCl2 injection. (A) Comparison of the body weight change of surviving rats in the different groups during the experiment. The body weight of HgCl2-injured rat groups stopped increasing and even decreased from the second day after the injection of HgCl2. The body weights of the total extract of rhubarb (TR), the total anthraquinones (TA) and the total tannins (TT) groups changed less than those in the HgCl2 alone group and the remaining components group (RC); (B) Comparison of the 12 h urine volume of surviving rats in the different groups at 48 h after HgCl2 injection. The urinary volumes decreased notably after HgCl2 intoxication. However, the urinary volumes of rats in the TR and TA groups were non-significantly different to the N group. ** p < 0.01 vs. group N; # p < 0.05 vs. group M.
Survival and pathological alterations by treatment of each rhubarb extract against HgCl2-induced acute renal failure.
| Groups | Survival a | Renal Tubule Epithelial Cells b | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Swelling | Granular Degeneration | Necrosis | Interstitial Vascular Congestion | ||
| N | 8 | - | - | - | - |
| M | 2 | +++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ |
| TR | 7 | ++ | + | ++ | ++ |
| TA | 7 | + | ++ | + | + |
| TT | 4 | ++++ | +++ | +++ | +++ |
| RC | 3 | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++++ |
a The initial number of animals in each group of the study was 8. b The severity extent of renal tubule epithelial cells necrosis: -, no; +, minimal; ++, mild; +++, moderate; ++++, marked.
Figure 2The rats in the total extract of rhubarb and the total anthraquinones groups showed amelioration in renal degeneration from kidney pictures and histopathologic section photos (HE stained, 200× magnification). (A) The control group; (B) the HgCl2 alone group; (C) the total extract of rhubarb group; (D) the total anthraquinones group; (E) the total tannins group and (F) the remaining components group.
Figure 3Compared to the HgCl2 alone group, blood serum urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine (CREA) values of rats were significantly lowered both in the total extract of rhubarb and the total anthraquinones-treated groups (p < 0.01) and the level of total protein (TP) and albumin (ALB) clearly increased (p < 0.01) at the end of the experiment. (A) The level of TP in blood serum; (B) the level of ALB in blood serum; (C) the level of BUN in blood serum and (D) the level of CREA in blood serum. The data were presented as means ± SE of eight rats in each group.* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. group N; ## p < 0.01 vs. group M.
Figure 4At 48 h after HgCl2 administration, there were almost no significant variation observed in superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, renal catalase (CAT) activity, and renal glutathione (GSH) content of each rhubarb extract group except the remaining components group (RC) for GPx and the total anthraquinones (TA) for SOD activity reversing (p < 0.05). (A) The level of renal cellular GSH; (B) the activity of renal GPx; (C) the activity of renal SOD and (D) the activity of renal CAT. The data were presented as means + SE of eight rats in each group. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. group N; # p < 0.05 vs. group M.
Figure 5The total ion current chromatograms of each extract were analyzed by HPLC–QTOF-MS in negative ESI mode. Peak numbers are corresponding to compound types in Table 2.
Identifications for the chromatographic peaks.
| Peak Number | RT (min) | [M − H]− | Identification | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.89 | 195.0505 | galactonic acid | TR, TT, RC |
| 2 | 1.02, 1.16 | 683.2243 | galabiose | TR, TT, RC |
| 3 | 2.00 | 191.0189 | citric acid | TR, TT, RC |
| 4 | 2.23 | 128.0351 | pyroglutamic acid | TR, TT, RC |
| 5 | 3.31 | 169.0136 | gallic acid | TR, TT, RC |
| 6 | 2.89, 3.16, 3.42, 3.63, 4.13 | 331.0665 | galloyl glucose | TR, TA, TT, RC |
| 7 | 4.42 | 577.1337 | procyanidin b5 | TR |
| 8 | 4.51 | 451.1238 | catechin glucoside | TR |
| 9 | 4.88, 5.54 | 289.0716 | catechin | TR, TT, RC |
| 10 | 5.01, 5.16 | 729.1448 | epicatechin-epicatechin-gallate | TR |
| 11 | 5.25 | 635.0876 | tri- | TR |
| 12 | 5.33 | 881.1569 | di- | TR, TT |
| 13 | 5.84 | 435.1291 | catechin | TR |
| 14 | 5.95 | 441.0816 | catechin- | TR, TT |
| 15 | 6.15, 6.26 | 477.1388 | coumaroyl- | TR |
| 16 | 6.6 | 541.1349 | resveratrol-( | TR, TT |
| 17 | 6.72 | 629.1499 | coumaroyl-di- | TR |
| 18 | 6.86 | 571.1446 | rhapontigenin-( | TR |
| 19 | 7.05 | 445.0756 | rhein- | TR, TA |
| 20 | 7.22 | 393.1177 | hydroxymusizin- | TR, TT |
| 21 | 7.4 | 861.191 | sennoside A/B | TR, TA, TT |
| 22 | 7.74 | 487.0867 | rhein- | TR |
| 23 | 7.82 | 947.1873 | sennoside | TR |
| 24 | 7.98 | 623.176 | dicoumaroyl- | TR |
| 25 | 8.07 | 407.1344 | torachrysone- | TR, TA |
| 26 | 8.44 | 415.1017 | chrysophanol- | TR, TA |
| 27 | 8.54 | 431.0966 | emodin- | TR, TA |
| 28 | 8.79 | 607.1818 | dicinnamoyl- | TR, TA |
| 29 | 8.86 | 457.1127 | chrysophanol- | TR, TA |
| 30 | 9.07 | 445.1121 | rhein- | TR, TA |
| 31 | 9.47 | 269.0452 | aloe-emodin | TR, TA |
| 32 | 9.99 | 283.0239 | rhein | TR, TA |
| 33 | 10.76 | 269.0448 | emodin | TR, TA |
| 34 | 11.11 | 253.0501 | chrysophanol | TR, TA |
| 35 | 12.6 | 283.2631 | physcion | TR, TA, TT, RC |
| 36 | 4.26, 4.34, 5.05, 5.14, 5.30 | 483.0777 | di- | TR, TA, TT |
| 37 | 7.72 | 487.0856 | rhein- | TR, TA |
| 38 | 7.99 | 623.1789 | dicoumaroyl- | TR, TA |
| 39 | 9.19 | 473.1071 | aloe-emodin- | TR, TA |
| 40 | 9.33 | 487.1239 | rhein- | TR, TA |
| 41 | 5.03 | 49.1072 | eriodictyol-glucose | TR, TT |
| 42 | 6.14 | 7.0456 | ethyl gallate | TR, TT |
| 43 | 6.72 | 629.1501 | coumaroyl-di- | TR, TT |
| 44 | 6.80, 6.87 | 571.1438 | rhapontigenin- | TR, TT |
| 45 | 7.04 | 847.2088 | sennoside C/D | TR, TT |
Figure 6The major constituents of each extract were identified and collectively shown using mass spectrometric data analysis results in Table 2. Colour code: White, not involved; Black, anthraquinones; Gray, non-anthraquinones.