| Literature DB >> 27005313 |
Vythegi Srithayakumar1,2, Gordon B Mitchell3, Bradley N White4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A clear association of amino acid variation in the prion protein gene (PRNP) with susceptibility and resistance to classical scrapie exists in sheep, but not in goats. In this study we examined DNA sequence variation in the PRNP of 149 animals from two scrapie-infected herds of Saanen dairy goats, and identified 6 non-synonymous variants in the coding region.Entities:
Keywords: Breeding; Goat; Prion; Resistance; Scrapie; Susceptibility; Variation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27005313 PMCID: PMC4804529 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-016-0684-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Fig. 1Nucleotide sequences of the eight variable sites for the ten haplotypes observed in the Ontario Saanen herds. C. hircus PRNP (genbank accession # X74758.1) was used as the reference. Synonymous substitutions are denoted in lower case
Allele frequencies for PRNP in herds 1 and 2
| Amino acid position | Haplotype frequency | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 142 | 143 | 146 | 211 | 222 | 240 | Herd 1 | Herd 2 | |
| 1 | I | H | N | R | Q | P | 0.459 | 0.526 |
| 2 | – | – | – | – | – | S | 0.305 | 0.231 |
| 3 | – | – | – | Q | – | S | 0.159 | 0.090 |
| 4 | – | – | S | – | – | – | 0.032 | 0.090 |
| 5¥ | M | – | – | Q | – | S | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| 6¥ | – | – | S | Q | – | S | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| 7¥ | – | – | – | Q | K | S | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| 8 | – | – | – | – | K | S | 0.014 | 0.000 |
| 9 | M | – | – | – | – | – | 0.014 | 0.064 |
| 10 | – | R | – | – | – | S | 0.005 | 0.000 |
¥ unconfirmed haplotypes
Comparison of genotypes among the complete herd, affected and unaffected animals in herd 1. Logistic regression was used to compare affected and unaffected animals
|
| Pre-exposurea | Scrapie positive sample | Scrapie negative sample | OR (95 % CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IHNRQP/IHNRQP | 53 | 16 | 7 | 2.947 | 0.033 |
| IHNRQS/IHNRQP | 63 | 28 | 6 | 8.974 | <0.005 |
| IHNRQS/IHNRQS | 13 | 7 | 1 | 8.191 | 0.055 |
| MHNRQP/IHNRQS | 14 | 0 | 3 | NDǂ | – |
| MHNQQS/IHNRQP | 5 | 0 | 1 | ND | – |
| IHNRQP/IRNRQS | 1 | 1 | 0 | ND | – |
| IHSRQP/IHNRQP | 9 | 0 | 2 | ND | – |
| IHSRQP/IHNRQS | 14 | 0 | 3 | ND | – |
| IHSRQP/IHSRQP | 5 | 0 | 1 | ND | – |
| ihsqqs/IHNRQP | 5 | 0 | 1 | ND | – |
| IHNQQS/IHNRQP | 67 | 1 | 14 | 0.057 | 0.007 |
| IHNQQS/IHNRQS | 44 | 1 | 9 | 0.098 | 0.033 |
| IHNQQS/IHNQQS | 24 | 0 | 5 | ND | – |
| IHNRKS/IHNRQP | 5 | 0 | 1 | ND | – |
| IHNRKS/IHNRQS | 5 | 0 | 1 | ND | – |
| IHNRKS/IHNQQS | 5 | 0 | 1 | ND | – |
| Total | 331 | 54 | 56 | – | – |
anumber of genotypes pre-exposure was estimated as described in the methods
ǂ OR could not be determined (ND) for genotypes without any scrapie positive cases
Comparison of observed and expected numbers of scrapie positive samples for each amino acid variant. Allele frequencies of the pre-exposed herd are indicated in parentheses. P-values of <0.05 are indicated in bold. Chi-square analysis was used for herd 1, and Fisher’s exact test was used for herd 2 as the sample size was low
| Numbers in Scrapie positive samples | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Herd #1 | Herd #2 | ||||
| Codon | Genotype | Observed | Expected≠ | Observed | Expected≠ |
| 142 | II (0.915) | 54 | 51 | 10 | 8 |
| IM (0.085) | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | |
| MM (0.000) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 143 | HH (0.997) | 53 | 54 | 10 | 10 |
| HR (0.000) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| RR (0.003) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 146 | NN (0.876) | 54 | 49 | 10 | 8 |
| NS (0.105) | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | |
| SS (0.019) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 211 | RR (0.615) | 52 | 30 | 10 | 8 |
| RQ (0.333) | 2 | 20 | 0 | 2 | |
| QQ (0.051) | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| 222 | QQ (0.969) | 54 | 52 | 10 | 10 |
| QK (0.021) | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| KK (0.010) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 240 | PP (0.295) | 16 | 12 | 3 | 5 |
| PS (0.465) | 30 | 28 | 7 | 3 | |
| SS (0.239) | 8 | 15 | 0 | 2 | |
≠Allele frequencies for the expected numbers were calculated using the frequencies of the pre-exposed herd
Comparison of the genotypes at position 211 to assess the relative scrapie risk
| Genotype | Pre-exposed herdǂ | Scrapie positiveǂ | Scrapie negativeǂ | Relative risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RR | 182 | 64 | 118 | 22 |
| RQ | 125 | 2 | 123 | 1 |
| 24 | 0 | 24 | 0 |
ǂTotal number of animals in each group, were calculated using the frequencies of the pre-exposed herd
Comparison of genotypes affected with scrapie from the literature. A total of 544 scrapie cases from various breeds were assessed
| Number of affected | 142 | 146 | 211 | 222 | References | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| II | IM | MM | NN | NS | SS | RR | RQ | QK | KK | ||||
| 30 | 83 | 1 | 0 | - | - | - | 83 | 7 | 0 | 87 | 3 | 0 | Barillet et al. 2009 |
| 259 | 238 | 21 | 0 | - | - | - | 246 | 13 | 0 | 256 | 3 | 0 | Corbiere et al. 2013 |
| 39 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 39 | 0 | 0 | Vaccari et al. 2006 |
| 27 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 27 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 0 | 0 | Bouzalas et al. 2010 |
| 25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 25 | 0 | 0 | Acutis et al. 2006 |
| 104 | 103 | 1 | 0 | 104 | 0 | 0 | 104 | 0 | 0 | 99 | 5 | 0 | Fragkiadaki et al. 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| - |