Literature DB >> 27005300

The 2015 hospital treatment choice reform in Norway: Continuity or change?

Ånen Ringard1, Ingrid Sperre Saunes2, Anna Sagan3.   

Abstract

In several European countries, including Norway, polices to increase patient choice of hospital provider have remained high on the political agenda. The main reason behind the interest in hospital choice reforms in Norway has been the belief that increasing choice can remedy the persistent problem of long waiting times for elective hospital care. Prior to the 2013 General Election, the Conservative Party campaigned in favour of a new choice reform: "the treatment choice reform". This article describes the background and process leading up to introduction of the reform in the autumn of 2015. It also provides a description of the content and discusses possible implications of the reform for patients, providers and government bodies. In sum, the reform contains elements of both continuity and change. The main novelty of the reform lies in the increased role of private for-profit healthcare providers.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hospital; Norway; Patient choice; Private providers; Reform

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27005300     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  5 in total

1.  Patient preference and choice of healthcare providers in Shanghai, China: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Wenya Yu; Meina Li; Feng Ye; Chen Xue; Lulu Zhang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Which patients receive surgery in for-profit and non-profit hospitals in a universal health system? An explorative register-based study in Norway.

Authors:  Geir Hiller Holom; Nina Alexandersen; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Terje P Hagen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Changes in job satisfaction among doctors in Norway from 2010 to 2017: a study based on repeated surveys.

Authors:  Judith Rosta; Olaf G Aasland; Magne Nylenna
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-08       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Challenges in turning a great idea into great health policy: the case of integrated care.

Authors:  Kasper Raus; Eric Mortier; Kristof Eeckloo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Professionals' perceptions of the establishment of a specialized brief therapy unit in a district psychiatric centre - a qualitative study.

Authors:  Hilde V Markussen; Lene Aasdahl; Marit B Rise
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.