Philippe Voyer1, Nathalie Champoux2, Johanne Desrosiers3, Philippe Landreville4, Johanne Monette5, Maryse Savoie6, Pierre-Hugues Carmichael7, Sylvie Richard7, Annick Bédard7. 1. Faculty of Nursing Sciences,Laval University,Quebec City,Quebec,Canada. 2. Department of Family Medicine,Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal,Université de Montréal,Montreal,Quebec,Canada. 3. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences,Université de Sherbrooke,Sherbrooke,Quebec,Canada. 4. School of Psychology,Laval University,Quebec City,Quebec,Canada. 5. Division of Geriatric Medicine,Jewish General Hospital and Donald Berman Maimonides Geriatric Center,Montreal,Quebec,Canada. 6. Ste. Anne Hospital,Ste-Anne de Bellevue,Quebec,Canada. 7. Centre for Excellence in Aging-Research Unit,Quebec City,Quebec,Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite its high prevalence and deleterious consequences, delirium often goes undetected in older hospitalized patients and long-term care (LTC) residents. Inattention is a core symptom of this syndrome. The aim of this study was to explore the usefulness of ten simple and objective attention tests that would enable efficient delirium screening among this population. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis (n = 191) of a validation study conducted in one acute care hospital (ACH) and one LTC facility among older adults with, or without, cognitive impairment. The attention test tasks (n = 10) were drawn from the Concentration subscale the Hierarchic Dementia Scale (HDS). Delirium was defined as meeting the criteria for DSM-5 delirium. The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) was used to determine the presence of delirium symptoms. RESULTS: The Months of the Year Backward (MOTYB) test, which 57% of participants completed successfully, showed the best balance between sensitivity and specificity (82.6%; 95% CI [61.2-95.0], and 62.5%; 95% CI [54.7-69.8] respectively) for the entire group. Subgroup analyses revealed that no test had both sensitivity and specificity over 50% in participants with cognitive impairment indicated in their medical chart. CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed that these tests varied greatly in performance and none can be earmarked to become a single-item screening tool for delirium among older patients and residents with, or without, cognitive impairment. The presence of premorbid cognitive impairment may necessitate more extensive assessments of delirium, especially when a change in general status or mental state is observed.
BACKGROUND: Despite its high prevalence and deleterious consequences, delirium often goes undetected in older hospitalized patients and long-term care (LTC) residents. Inattention is a core symptom of this syndrome. The aim of this study was to explore the usefulness of ten simple and objective attention tests that would enable efficient delirium screening among this population. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis (n = 191) of a validation study conducted in one acute care hospital (ACH) and one LTC facility among older adults with, or without, cognitive impairment. The attention test tasks (n = 10) were drawn from the Concentration subscale the Hierarchic Dementia Scale (HDS). Delirium was defined as meeting the criteria for DSM-5 delirium. The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) was used to determine the presence of delirium symptoms. RESULTS: The Months of the Year Backward (MOTYB) test, which 57% of participants completed successfully, showed the best balance between sensitivity and specificity (82.6%; 95% CI [61.2-95.0], and 62.5%; 95% CI [54.7-69.8] respectively) for the entire group. Subgroup analyses revealed that no test had both sensitivity and specificity over 50% in participants with cognitive impairment indicated in their medical chart. CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed that these tests varied greatly in performance and none can be earmarked to become a single-item screening tool for delirium among older patients and residents with, or without, cognitive impairment. The presence of premorbid cognitive impairment may necessitate more extensive assessments of delirium, especially when a change in general status or mental state is observed.
Authors: Wolfgang Hasemann; Florian F Grossmann; Rahel Stadler; Roland Bingisser; Dieter Breil; Martina Hafner; Reto W Kressig; Christian H Nickel Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2017-12-30 Impact factor: 3.397
Authors: Simone Brefka; Gerhard Wilhelm Eschweiler; Dhayana Dallmeier; Michael Denkinger; Christoph Leinert Journal: Z Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2022-01-14 Impact factor: 1.292
Authors: Pia Urfer Dettwiler; Franziska Zúñiga; Stefanie Bachnick; Beatrice Gehri; Jos F M de Jonghe; Wolfgang Hasemann Journal: Eur Geriatr Med Date: 2022-02-10 Impact factor: 3.269
Authors: David J Meagher; Henry O'Connell; Maeve Leonard; Olugbenga Williams; Fahad Awan; Chris Exton; Michael Tenorio; Margaret O'Connor; Colum P Dunne; Walter Cullen; John McFarland; Dimitrios Adamis Journal: World J Psychiatry Date: 2020-04-19
Authors: Letty Oudewortel; Karlijn J Joling; Cees M P M Hertogh; Viona J M Wijnen; Anne A M van der Brug; Willem A van Gool Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2018-07-23 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Zoë Tieges; David J Stott; Robert Shaw; Elaine Tang; Lisa-Marie Rutter; Eva Nouzova; Nikki Duncan; Caoimhe Clarke; Christopher J Weir; Valentina Assi; Hannah Ensor; Jennifer H Barnett; Jonathan Evans; Samantha Green; Kirsty Hendry; Meigan Thomson; Jenny McKeever; Duncan G Middleton; Stuart Parks; Tim Walsh; Alexander J Weir; Elizabeth Wilson; Tara Quasim; Alasdair M J MacLullich Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 3.240