Literature DB >> 27004704

The use of pre-test and post-test probability values as criteria before selecting patients to undergo coronary angiography in patients who have ischemic findings on myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.

Nazlı Pınar Karahan Şen1, Recep Bekiş2, Ali Ceylan3, Erkan Derebek2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) is a diagnostic test which is frequently used in the diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CHD). MPS is generally interpreted as ischemia present or absent; however, it has a power in predicting the disease, similar to other diagnostic tests. In this study, we aimed to assist in directing the high-risk patients to undergo coronary angiography (CA) primarily by evaluating patients without prior CHD history with pre-test and post-test probabilities.
METHODS: The study was designed as a retrospective study. Between January 2008 and July 2011, 139 patients with positive MPS results and followed by CA recently (<6 months) were evaluated from patient files. Patients' pre-test probabilities based on the Diamond and Forrester method and the likelihood ratios that were obtained from the literature were used to calculate the patients' post exercise and post-MPS probabilities. Patients were evaluated in risk groups as low, intermediate, and high, and an ROC curve analysis was performed for the post-MPS probabilities.
RESULTS: Coronary artery stenosis (CAS) was determined in 59 patients (42.4%). A significant difference was determined between the risk groups according to CAS, both for the pre-test and post-test probabilities (p<0.001, p=0.024). The ROC analysis provided a cut-off value of 80.4% for post- MPS probability in predicting CAS with 67.9% sensitivity and 77.8% specificity.
CONCLUSION: When the post-MPS probability is ≥80% in patients who have reversible perfusion defects on MPS, we suggest interpreting the MPS as "high probability positive" to improve the selection of true-positive patients to undergo CA, and these patients should be primarily recommended CA.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 27004704      PMCID: PMC5331399          DOI: 10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2015.6347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol        ISSN: 2149-2263            Impact factor:   1.596


  21 in total

1.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines).

Authors:  Raymond J Gibbons; Gary J Balady; J Timothy Bricker; Bernard R Chaitman; Gerald F Fletcher; Victor F Froelicher; Daniel B Mark; Ben D McCallister; Aryan N Mooss; Michael G O'Reilly; William L Winters; Raymond J Gibbons; Elliott M Antman; Joseph S Alpert; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Gabriel Gregoratos; Loren F Hiratzka; Alice K Jacobs; Richard O Russell; Sidney C Smith
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Procedure guideline for myocardial perfusion imaging 3.3.

Authors:  H William Strauss; D Douglas Miller; Mark D Wittry; Manuel D Cerqueira; Ernest V Garcia; Abdulmassi S Iskandrian; Heinrich R Schelbert; Frans J Wackers; Helena R Balon; Otto Lang; Josef Machac
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2008-08-14

Review 3.  Cardiovascular effects of estrogen and lipid-lowering therapies in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  V Guetta; R O Cannon
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-05-15       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Authors:  Stephan D Fihn; Julius M Gardin; Jonathan Abrams; Kathleen Berra; James C Blankenship; Apostolos P Dallas; Pamela S Douglas; Joanne M Foody; Thomas C Gerber; Alan L Hinderliter; Spencer B King; Paul D Kligfield; Harlan M Krumholz; Raymond Y K Kwong; Michael J Lim; Jane A Linderbaum; Michael J Mack; Mark A Munger; Richard L Prager; Joseph F Sabik; Leslee J Shaw; Joanna D Sikkema; Craig R Smith; Sidney C Smith; John A Spertus; Sankey V Williams; Jeffrey L Anderson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease.

Authors:  G A Diamond; J S Forrester
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-06-14       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: validation, updating, and extension.

Authors:  Tessa S S Genders; Ewout W Steyerberg; Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Leschka; Lotus Desbiolles; Koen Nieman; Tjebbe W Galema; W Bob Meijboom; Nico R Mollet; Pim J de Feyter; Filippo Cademartiri; Erica Maffei; Marc Dewey; Elke Zimmermann; Michael Laule; Francesca Pugliese; Rossella Barbagallo; Valentin Sinitsyn; Jan Bogaert; Kaatje Goetschalckx; U Joseph Schoepf; Garrett W Rowe; Joanne D Schuijf; Jeroen J Bax; Fleur R de Graaf; Juhani Knuuti; Sami Kajander; Carlos A G van Mieghem; Matthijs F L Meijs; Maarten J Cramer; Deepa Gopalan; Gudrun Feuchtner; Guy Friedrich; Gabriel P Krestin; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 7.  Bedside diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrea Akita Chun; Steven R McGee
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Estimating the likelihood of significant coronary artery disease.

Authors:  D B Pryor; F E Harrell; K L Lee; R M Califf; R A Rosati
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Value of the history and physical in identifying patients at increased risk for coronary artery disease.

Authors:  D B Pryor; L Shaw; C B McCants; K L Lee; D B Mark; F E Harrell; L H Muhlbaier; R M Califf
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 10.  Diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marcus C de Jong; Tessa S S Genders; Robert-Jan van Geuns; Adriaan Moelker; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.