Literature DB >> 27004269

Comparison of Cell and Nuclear Size Difference between Diploid and Induced Triploid in Marine Medaka, Oryzias dancena.

In Bon Goo1, Jae Hyun Im1, Hyun Woo Gil2, Sang Gu Lim3, In-Seok Park2.   

Abstract

The influence of triploidization on cell and nucleus size characteristics of the same tissues of erythrocyte, retina, kidney, hepatocyte and midgut epithelium in marine medaka, Oryzias dancena has been determined histologically. Induced triploid fish are produced by cold shock treatments. Likewise, the size of horizontal cell nucleus in inner nuclear layer of retina, ganglion cell nucleus in ganglion cell layer of retina, proximal tubule cell of kidney, hepatocytes and nuclear height of midgut epithelium all appear to be significantly larger than diploid (p<0.05). On the other hand, retina thickness is larger in diploid than induced triploid (p<0.05). Induced triploid shows low density of cell number. Results of this study suggest that same characteristics in the induced triploid exhibiting larger cells and nucleus sizes with fewer number of cells than the diploid can be useful criteria for the distinction between diploid and induced triploid, and also the ploidy level in marine medaka.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diploid; Histological observation; Induced triploid; Marine medaka

Year:  2015        PMID: 27004269      PMCID: PMC4801045          DOI: 10.12717/DR.2015.19.3.127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Reprod        ISSN: 2465-9525


INTRODUCTION

We adopted the experimental marine medaka, Oryzias dancena. Because the marine medaka is gaining attention as an experimental animal in the aquaculture. This fish is a truly euryhaline teleost, with a great capacity for hypo- and hyperosmoregulation. It also has a short interval between generations, with spawning possibilities just 60 days after hatching. Most of its physiological attributes are similar across a wide spectrum of salinities, ranging from complete freshwater to normal seawater (Inoue & Takei, 2003; Kang et al., 2008; Cho et al., 2010). Much attention has been directed toward extending the utility of functional transgenic marine medaka strains for ornamental purposes because they can be used at most naturally occurring salinities (Cho et al., 2011). The induction of triploidy has been achieved in a number of different freshwater and marine fish species (Felip et al., 2001). The main benefit of triploidy is sterility condition. Sterility allows organisms to avoid the metabolic costs of sexual maturation, resulting in continued somatic growths of triploid fish, with maintenance of flesh quality during the period when the diploids sexually mature. In addition, sterility prevents fish mortality related to spawning (Benfey, 1999). Because of these advantages, the induction and rearing of triploid fish have been practiced in the aquaculture of several economically relevant species (Hulata, 2001). Furthermore, sterile triploid fish are unable to breed and contribute to the local gene pool if they escape from the confinement. By conferring in the desired introduction of exotic fish species for limited purposes, triploidy can serve as an effective method by which to reduce or eliminate the environmental risks of genetically modified organisms (Dunham & Devlin, 1999). Triploid has many advantages. Induced triploid by blocking the second meiosis has been proposed as one approach for the generation of transgenic fish with depressed reproductive capacities (Piferrer et al., 2009). Induced triploid fish have impaired gametogenesis and investments in somatic growth may not be hindered by the metabolic costs of sexual maturation. Additionally, sterility of induced triploid may be the means to prevent the decline in flesh quality associated with sexual maturation, and it also addresses concerns regarding the environmental impact of farmed escapees (Peruzzi et al., 2004). An important consequence of increased nuclear and/or cellular volume in triploid fish is the decreased ratio of surface area to volume. This could affect processes limited by the surface area, such as nutrient and metabolite exchanges, passive and active ion exchanges, and membrane binding of hormones and other messengers. Due to decreased cell numbers, this decreased ratio of surface to volume also applies to whole tissues and organs (Benfey, 1999). A second important consequence of increased nuclear and/or cellular volume is that, depending on the shape of the cell and its nucleus, the internal transport and diffusion distance may be increased. This could affect processes such as signal transduction from the cell surface to the nucleus, as well as the resultant production and movement of RNA and proteins within and outside the nucleus and cell (Benfey, 1999). Some of these potential disadvantages of triploid cells may be offset by energetic advantages arising from reduced production and maintenance of cellular membranes and from the smaller relative surface area across where the ionic and osmotic gradients must be maintained (Benfey, 1999). Futhermore, there are numerous studies in the literature which have investigated various aspects of induced triploid fish identification methodology including analysis of the measurement of erythrocyte and nuclear size, the distinction of nucleolar number, the measurement of cell number, and the measurement of cell and nuclear size in different tissues (Benfey, 1999; Park & Kim, 2000). For this reason, the purpose of this study is to determine and to compare whether diploid and induced triploid marine medaka are different in terms of main hematological and histological characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Induced triploid inducement

Experimental group of diploid marine medaka, Oryzias dancena in this study were reared by methods of Park et al. (2011). On 24 September 2013, the one hundred fishes were quarantined by the male and female categories and habituated in the 100 L glass aquariums for 3 days. The sex ratio of males and females was 60 males and 40 females. For collecting eggs, the fish whose standard length were over 25 mm used in this experiment and 35 males and 15 females of marine medaka were placed in each of two aquariums, and 1,000 fertilized eggs were collected immediately by net. The fertilized eggs of diploid experi-mental group (n=500) were reared in 100 L glass aquarium. Induced triploid was induced in the marine medaka by the cold shock treatment (4°C) of fertilized eggs for two minutes after fertilization of 45 minutes (Ko, 2013). The induced triploid genotype was induced by all thermal shock regimes tested. Induced triploid was confirmed with chromosomal and erythrocyte measurements and also the flow-cytometric analyses by using flow cytometry (PA-II, Partec, Germany).

Histological observation

We extracted the eye, kidney and midgut epithelium needed for histological observations from each species. Each sample was fixed in Bouin's solution during the day and washed with flowing water. For decalcification, they were processed in decalcification solution for 24 hrs, and then, washed again. Next, in the order of 70% alcohol, 80% alcohol, 90% alcohol and 100% alcohol used for dehydration of 1 hour each. Clearing the xylene for impregnation , they were treated with both soft paraffin and hard paraffin. After impregnation, samples were embedded, trimmed and cut. At this time, each barbell of the upper, central and lower parts were by a 6 μm thickness across and longitudinally. Afterwards, they were stained with hematoxylineosin staining. Next, the samples were mounted with Canadian balsam and all processes were completed. We took pictures with an optical microscope camera (Axiocam MR, Carl Zeiss, Germany) after scrutinizing by optical microscopy (Axiostar Plus, Carl Zeiss, Germany). Using an eyepiece micrometer under an optical microscope, we used the methods of Park et al. (2006) to measure the thickness of the retina; the epithelial layer (EL), the rod and cone layer (RCL), the outer limiting membrane layer (OLM), the inner nuclear layer (INL), the inner plexiform layer (IPL), and the ganglion cell layer (GCL). To analyze the development of the kidney and midgut epithelium, we used the Axioskop 4.1 image analysis software (Carl Zeiss, Germany) to measure the areas and volumes of the cells and nuclei with the following formulae: surface area = 1/4 × abπ, and volume = 4/3 × π(a/2) × (b/2)2, where a is the major axis of the cell or nucleus; and b is the minor axis of the cell or nucleus (Park & Kim, 2000).

Statistical analysis

The experiment was performed in triplicate and the results are reported as means of ±SD (n=30), unless otherwise stated. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA when using the SPSS statistical package (SPSS 9.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Means were compared by using Duncan's multiple range test, and were considered to be significantly different at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Fig. 1 showed the retina layer of marine medaka, Oryzias dancena eyes. The thickness of retina was about 1.31 times different. The ratio of the length was different for each layer, but triploid was measured to be longer than diploid from all layers. Outer limiting membrane (OLM) consists of cone photo-receptors with a shorter tapered outer segment, larger ovoid ellipsoids containing an oil droplet, and nuclei. Outer segments of photoreceptors were partially enveloped by projections of the pigment epithelium. It has a network-like structure and is situated at the base of the rods and cones. Outer nuclear layer (ONL) consists of the nerve fibers leading to the optic tract. There was also a difference in the cellular structure between triploids and diploids. In triploids, the outer nuclear layer consisted of two strata of nuclei, while in diploids, the same layer consisted of three strata of nuclei. Outer plexiform layer (OPL) is organized as a thin reticular tissue. Inner nuclear layer (INL) has horizontal, amacrine, and bipolar cells. Inner plexiform layer (IPL) consists of reticular tissues. Ganglion cell layer (GCL) contains the perikarya of ganglion cells and dis-placed amacrine cells. Optic nerve fiber layer (ONFL) consists of the nerve fibers leading to the optic tract (Park et al., 2006). Retina forned layer of cells along the inside lining of the eye. Induced triploid thickness of retina are smaller than diploids, and induced triploid ratio of retina OLM was 1.22 times, ONL was 0.98 times, OPL was 1.07 times, INL was 1.22 times, IPL was 1.01 times, GCL was 1.19 times, ONFL was 1.12 times larger than diploid measured trends (Table 1).
Fig. 1.

Histological sections of retina in diploid (A) and induced triploid (B) marine medaka, Oryzias dancena.

Outer nuclear layer (*1), horizontal cell nucleus (*2) in inner nuclear layer. Epithelium layer (EL), Ganglion cell layer (GCL), Inner nuclear layer (INL), Inner plexiform layer (IPL), Outer limiting membrane (OLM), Optic nerve fiber layer (ONFL), Outer nuclear layer (ONL), Outer plexiform layer (OPL) and Rod and cone layer (RCL). Bars indicate 25 μm.

Table 1.

Thickness in each component layer and the numbers of outer nuclear layer of retina in diploid and induced triploid marine medaka, Oryzias dancena*

DiploidInduced triploidRatios of means

Thickness of retina (µm)110.9±2.15a97.7±2.50b0.88
Thickness of each layer of retina (%)
Epithelial layer22.5±0.89a22.6±1.52a1.01
Rod and cone layer11.9±0.85a12.9±0.95b1.08
Outer limiting membrane4.5±0.40a5.5±0.32b1.22
Outer nuclear layer12.3±0.43a12.0±0.98a0.98
Outer plexiform layer4.1±0.21a4.4±0.58b1.07
Inner nuclear layer13.1±0.44a16.0±0.21b1.22
Inner plexiform layer23.0±0.42a23.2±0.22a1.01
Ganglion cell layer4.9±0.14a5.8±0.46b1.19
Optic nerve fiber layer5.7±0.56a6.4±1.03b1.12
Number of outer layer cellnucleus3a2b

Each values are the means standard deviation of triplicated groups. Means in rows with the different superscript letter are significantly different (P < 0.05), Ratios of means = induced triploid/diploid.

Histological sections of retina in diploid (A) and induced triploid (B) marine medaka, Oryzias dancena.

Outer nuclear layer (*1), horizontal cell nucleus (*2) in inner nuclear layer. Epithelium layer (EL), Ganglion cell layer (GCL), Inner nuclear layer (INL), Inner plexiform layer (IPL), Outer limiting membrane (OLM), Optic nerve fiber layer (ONFL), Outer nuclear layer (ONL), Outer plexiform layer (OPL) and Rod and cone layer (RCL). Bars indicate 25 μm. Thickness in each component layer and the numbers of outer nuclear layer of retina in diploid and induced triploid marine medaka, Oryzias dancena* Each values are the means standard deviation of triplicated groups. Means in rows with the different superscript letter are significantly different (P < 0.05), Ratios of means = induced triploid/diploid. Horizontal cell nucleus in the inner nuclear layer of retina major axis, minor axis, surface area and volume were each 1.10, 1.21, 1.33 and 1.60 times larger than diploid, and appeared to be significantly different (Table 2) (P<0.05). Also, ganglion cell nucleus in the ganglion cell layer of retina major axis, minor axis, surface area and volume were each larger than 1.29, 1.24, 1.60 and 2.00 times of diploid, and appeared to be significantly different (Table 2) (P<0.05). On the other hand, induced triploid horizontal cell nucleus and ganglion cell nucleus show lower density than diploid (Fig. 1).
Table 2.

Nuclear size for horizontal cell and ganglion cell of retina and neuronal cell of optic tectum in diploid and induced triploid marine medaka, Oryzias dancena*

DiploidInduced triploidRatios of means

Horizontal cell nucleus in inner nuclear layer ofretina**
Major axis(µm)3.7±0.28a4.0±0.33b1.10
Minor axis(µm)2.2±0.11a2.6±0.13b1.21
Surface area(µm2)6.3±0.69a8.3±0.87b1.33
Volume(µm3)9.1±0.79a14.6±1.44b1.60
Ganglion cell nucleus in ganglion cell layer ofretina**
Major axis(µm)3.2±0.14a4.1±0.46b1.29
Minor axis(µm)2.9±0.26a3.6±0.23b1.24
Surface area(µm2)7.2±0.90a11.5±1.10b1.60
Volume(µm3)14.0±1.29a27.9±1.78b2.00

Each values are the means standard deviation of triplicated groups. Means in rows with the different superscript letter are significantly different (P < 0.05), Ratios of means = induced triploid/diploid.

Surface area= 1/4 × abπ and volume = 4/3 × π(a/2) × (b/2)2 (where a = the major axis of a cell or nucleus; b = the minor axis of a cell or nucleus; after Park and Kim, 2000).

Nuclear size for horizontal cell and ganglion cell of retina and neuronal cell of optic tectum in diploid and induced triploid marine medaka, Oryzias dancena* Each values are the means standard deviation of triplicated groups. Means in rows with the different superscript letter are significantly different (P < 0.05), Ratios of means = induced triploid/diploid. Surface area= 1/4 × abπ and volume = 4/3 × π(a/2) × (b/2)2 (where a = the major axis of a cell or nucleus; b = the minor axis of a cell or nucleus; after Park and Kim, 2000). Kidney, liver and intestine of diploid and induced triploid were compared at Fig. 2. We observed histological sections for proximal tubule cell of kidney, hepatocytes of liver and midgut epithelium. From observed results, the induced triploid was larger than diploid. The histological structure of marine medaka liver and intestine major axis ratios of diploid and induced triploid of kidney were 1.19 times, and the surface area was 1.74 times where the major axis and minor axis ratios of hepatocytes were 1.29 times and 1.52 times. Ratios on nuclear height of midgut epithelium appeared to be 1.20 times (Table 3). Each of induced triploid cell and nucleus size are shown to be bigger than diploid, but the induced triploid cell and nucleus appeared as low density (P<0.05).
Fig. 2.

Histological sections of kidney, liver, and intestine in diploid and induced triploid marine medaka, Oryzias dancena. Kidney of diploid (A) and induced triploid (B), Liver of diploid (C) and induced triploid (D), Intestine of diploid (E), and induced triploid (F). Arrows indicate nucleus of each tissue. Bars indicate 25 μm.

Table 3.

Size of proximal tubule cell in kidney, hepatocytes in liver and nuclear height of midgut epithelium in diploid and induced triploid marine medaka, Oryzias dancena*

DiploidInduced triploidRatios of means

Proximal tubule cell ofkidney**
Major axis(µm)3.7±0.28a4.7±0.33b1.19
Minor axis(µm)2.1±0.11a2.8±0.13b1.19
Surface area(µm2)6.1±0.69a10.7±0.87b1.74
Volume(µm3)9.8±0.79a21.4±1.44b1.26
Cell number in proximaltubule12.5±0.81a8.9±0.52b0.71
Hepatocytes ofliver**
Major axis(µm)4.6±0.14a5.1±0.46b1.29
Minor axis(µm)3.4±0.26a4.1±0.23b1.52
Surface area(µm2)16.6±1.90a16.7±3.40b1.00
Volume(µm3)47.1±8.29a46.3±5.18b
Nuclear height of midgut epithelium4.8±0.25a5.8±0.21b1.20

Each values are the means standard deviation of triplicated groups. Means in rows with the different superscript letter are significantly different (P < 0.05), Ratios of means = induced triploid/diploid.

Surface area= 1/4 × abπ and volume = 4/3 × π(a/2) × (b/2)2 (where a = the major axis of a cell or nucleus; b = the minor axis of a cell or nucleus; after Park and Kim, 2000).

Histological sections of kidney, liver, and intestine in diploid and induced triploid marine medaka, Oryzias dancena. Kidney of diploid (A) and induced triploid (B), Liver of diploid (C) and induced triploid (D), Intestine of diploid (E), and induced triploid (F). Arrows indicate nucleus of each tissue. Bars indicate 25 μm. Size of proximal tubule cell in kidney, hepatocytes in liver and nuclear height of midgut epithelium in diploid and induced triploid marine medaka, Oryzias dancena* Each values are the means standard deviation of triplicated groups. Means in rows with the different superscript letter are significantly different (P < 0.05), Ratios of means = induced triploid/diploid. Surface area= 1/4 × abπ and volume = 4/3 × π(a/2) × (b/2)2 (where a = the major axis of a cell or nucleus; b = the minor axis of a cell or nucleus; after Park and Kim, 2000).

DISCUSSION

We took blood and tissues (kidney, liver, intestine and retina) samples of marine medaka, Oryzias dancena, and then each of diploid and induced triploid cells were compared. Method of induced triploid fish was well known with chemical treatment such as colchicine and cytochalasin B, or temperature treatment to fertilization of eggs or physical treatments that were applied with pressure. Chemical treatments are often used in plants and shellfish, physical treatments are used in fishes (Thorgaard, 1986). We have experimented with physical treatments in this study. Although the triploid fish appeared to be 1.5 times with chromosome increased and bigger cell size phenomenon than diploid, but the body size did not present gigantism. This phenomenon reported by Swarup (1959b), the triploid stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus, cartilage, blood and neuron cell and nuclear size increased as compared to diploid, but these results not affect body size gigantism. Triploid has red blood cells and nuclear sizes bigger than diploids while the triploid number of red blood cells decreased more than diploid, this reason offsets the body size gigantism effect, and triploid fish which causes red blood cell enzyme activity reductions, and lowers oxygen transport (Ueno, 1984; Sezaki et al., 1988; Park & Park, 1995). The number of outer nuclear layer was three in diploid, while two appeared in triploid. These result observed other species, stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus and sweet fish, Plecoglossus altivelis (Swarup, 1959a; Aliah et al., 1990). Triploid thickness of outer nuclear layer percentage was smaller than diploid, and also retina thickness was small as compared to diploid. In induced triploid, the rod and cone layer percentage for thickness of retina was 1.08 times bigger than diploid, and similar results which appeared in triploid sweet fish increased when compared to diploid sweet fish (Aliah et al., 1990). In case of diploid, the sweet fish nuclear number of rod and cone layer was much more than triploid sweet fish. For this reason, the induced triploid sweet fish indicated low accuracy of visual as compared to diploid (Aliah et al., 1990). Also, the adverse aspects of induced triploid showed rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, where induced triploid rainbow trout easily feels stress. During mix breeding, the induced triploid rainbow trout is turned over for feeding competition as compared to diploid (Aliah et al., 1990; Lincoln & Bye, 1984). Triploid horizontal cell nucleus found in the inner nuclear layer of retina major axis, minor axis, surface area and volume and ganglion cell nucleus in ganglion cell layer of retina major axis, minor axis, surface area and volume all increased due to chromosome haploid increases (Thorgaard, 1986; Aliah et al., 1990). We measured proximal tubule cells of the marine medaka kidney. Major axis, minor axis and volume have small differences for each sample lengths. The surface areas of induced triploid samples are 1.74 times longer than diploid samples. This is the longest ratio of differentiation with induced triploid and diploid. Measured hepatocytes, the largest ratio value of diploid and induced triploid are minor axis, which is 1.52 times. The least ratio value of surface area is 1.00 times. Overall, induced triploid fish is bigger than diploid fish and ratio values are a variety of distribution. Thus, we can find the percentage differences of diploid and induced triploid tissues. In previous studies, many organs and tissues have larger but fewer cells in induced triploids, including the brain, muscle, retina, liver and kidney (Benfey, 1999). This arises due to the extra set of chromosomes dictating an increase in cell nucleus dimensions which affects overall cell size. As a result, this dissertation suggests that some tissues of induced triploid are larger than those of diploid in cells and muscles. This is infertility that is related to induced triploid features. Sterile induced triploid used less energy in the gonad maturity (Cal et al., 2006). Therefore, the fish meat quality is high and of good taste because of the energy used growth. Therefore, industry of induced triploidization of high quality fish such as salmon, and flounder is a common trend (Kim & Nam, 2001). From this trend, we obtained histological data of induced triploid tissues. Our results can be used in the future as the baseline data for measuring the histological comparisons of diploid and induced triploid tissues in fish. In this study, induced triploid marine medaka showed increased sizes in red blood cell and nuclear, horizontal cell nucleus in inner nuclear layer of retina major axis, minor axis, surface area and volume and ganglion cell nucleus in ganglion cell layers of retina major axis, minor axis, surface area and volume. On the other hand, the number of outer nuclear layers in retina and nucleus number in proximal tubule of kidney decreased like other triploid fish. The increased size of cell and nucleus and the decreased number of cell and nucleus in some tissue phenomenon are useful for indicating the use of ploidy distinctions.
  6 in total

Review 1.  Genetic manipulations in aquaculture: a review of stock improvement by classical and modern technologies.

Authors:  G Hulata
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Induction of triploidy and gynogenesis in teleost fish with emphasis on marine species.

Authors:  A Felip; S Zanuy; M Carrillo; F Piferrer
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Anesthetic effects of clove oil and lidocaine-HCl on marine medaka (Oryzias dancena).

Authors:  In-Seok Park; Sung Jun Park; Hyun Woo Gil; Yoon Kwon Nam; Dong Soo Kim
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 12.625

4.  Functional ability of cytoskeletal β-actin regulator to drive constitutive and ubiquitous expression of a fluorescent reporter throughout the life cycle of transgenic marine medaka Oryzias dancena.

Authors:  Young Sun Cho; Sang Yoon Lee; Youn Kyoung Kim; Dong Soo Kim; Yoon Kwon Nam
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 5.  Asian medaka fishes offer new models for studying mechanisms of seawater adaptation.

Authors:  Koji Inoue; Yoshio Takei
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.231

6.  Differential expression of branchial Na+/K(+)-ATPase of two medaka species, Oryzias latipes and Oryzias dancena, with different salinity tolerances acclimated to fresh water, brackish water and seawater.

Authors:  Chao-Kai Kang; Shu-Chuan Tsai; Tsung-Han Lee; Pung-Pung Hwang
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2008-07-20       Impact factor: 2.320

  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  Modifications in the proteome of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) embryo and fry as an effect of triploidy induction.

Authors:  Samad Bahrami Babaheydari; Saeed Keyvanshokooh; Salar Dorafshan; Seyed Ali Johari
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.794

2.  Various Characteristics of Hybrid between River Puffer, Takifugu obscurus and Tiger Puffer, T. rubripes, and Their Hybrid Triploid.

Authors:  In-Seok Park; Sung Young Lim; Tae Ho Lee; Hyun Woo Gil; Gwang Yeol Yoo
Journal:  Dev Reprod       Date:  2017-06-30

3.  Morphometric Characteristic between Diploid and Spontaneous Triploid Carp in Korea.

Authors:  Sang Gu Lim; Hyeng Keun Han; In Bon Goo; Hyun Woo Gil; Tae Ho Lee; In-Seok Park
Journal:  Dev Reprod       Date:  2017-03-31

4.  Effects of Clove Oil and Lidocaine-HCl Anesthesia on Water Parameter during Simulated Transportation in the Marine Medaka, Oryzias dancena.

Authors:  In-Seok Park; Hyun Woo Gil; Tae Ho Lee; Yoon Kwon Nam; Sang Gu Lim; Dong Soo Kim
Journal:  Dev Reprod       Date:  2017-03-31

5.  Morphometric Characteristics and Fin Dimorphism between Male and Female on the Marine Medaka, Oryzias dancena.

Authors:  Jae Hyun Im; Hyun Woo Gil; Tae Ho Lee; Hee Jeong Kong; Cheol Min Ahn; Bong Seok Kim; Dong Soo Kim; Chang Ik Zhang; In-Seok Park
Journal:  Dev Reprod       Date:  2016-12-31

Review 6.  A review of studies on Oryzias dancena.

Authors:  In-Seok Park
Journal:  Lab Anim Res       Date:  2021-01-06

7.  Transcriptome sequencing and histology reveal dosage compensation in the liver of triploid pre-smolt Atlantic salmon.

Authors:  Derrick K Odei; Ørjan Hagen; Stefano Peruzzi; Inger-Britt Falk-Petersen; Jorge M O Fernandes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.