Literature DB >> 27003322

[Requirements for drug approval and additional benefits assessment: Regulatory aspects and experiences].

K Broich1, W Löbker2, A Schulte3, P Beinlich3, T Müller2.   

Abstract

The early assessment of benefits of newly approved drugs with novel active substances or new applications, which came into force on 1 January 2011 still represents a challenge to all parties involved. This article highlights the definitions, regulatory requirements and interaction between drug marketing approval and early assessment of benefits in Germany. The constellation of an extensively harmonized European and even international drug authorization process with a predominantly national regulation of drug reimbursement situation inevitably causes friction, which could be markedly reduced through early joint advisory discussions during the planning phase for pivotal clinical trials. During the year 2015 the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM) carried out 300 scientific advice procedures of which 34 were concerned with applications in the field of indications for the central nervous system (CNS). In comparison 98 advisory meetings were held by the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) of which the BfArM provided advice in 12 instances and in 2 cases on CNS indications. Study design, endpoints and appropriate comparative therapies are the key issues in exchanges and discussions between the BfArM, the G‑BA and applicants. Under these aspects the BfArM and G‑BA promote an early and consistent involvement in early advice procedures regarding the prerequisites for drug approval and assessment of additional benefits.

Keywords:  Act on the reform of the market for medicinal products (AMNOG); Additional Benefit analysis; Drug evaluation; Health technology assessment; Reimbursement

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27003322     DOI: 10.1007/s00115-016-0101-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nervenarzt        ISSN: 0028-2804            Impact factor:   1.214


  6 in total

1.  Results of treatment changes in patients with apparently drug-resistant chronic epilepsy.

Authors:  Anna L Luciano; Simon D Shorvon
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 10.422

2.  Likelihood of seizure remission in an adult population with refractory epilepsy.

Authors:  Brian C Callaghan; Kishlay Anand; Dale Hesdorffer; W Allen Hauser; Jacqueline A French
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 10.422

3.  [Interplay between marketing authorization and early benefit assessment of drugs].

Authors:  Peggy Beinlich; J Müller-Berghaus; T Sudhop; S Vieths; K Broich
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  A placebo-controlled trial of oral fingolimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Ludwig Kappos; Ernst-Wilhelm Radue; Paul O'Connor; Chris Polman; Reinhard Hohlfeld; Peter Calabresi; Krzysztof Selmaj; Catherine Agoropoulou; Malgorzata Leyk; Lixin Zhang-Auberson; Pascale Burtin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Oral fingolimod or intramuscular interferon for relapsing multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Cohen; Frederik Barkhof; Giancarlo Comi; Hans-Peter Hartung; Bhupendra O Khatri; Xavier Montalban; Jean Pelletier; Ruggero Capra; Paolo Gallo; Guillermo Izquierdo; Klaus Tiel-Wilck; Ana de Vera; James Jin; Tracy Stites; Stacy Wu; Shreeram Aradhye; Ludwig Kappos
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Early benefit assessment (EBA) in Germany: analysing decisions 18 months after introducing the new AMNOG legislation.

Authors:  Jörg Ruof; Friedrich Wilhelm Schwartz; J-Matthias Schulenburg; Charalabos-Markos Dintsios
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-06-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.