Literature DB >> 27003144

Overview of High-Risk Medical Device Innovation in Gastroenterology from 2000 to 2014: Enhancing the Pipeline.

Nasir Saleem1, Shuai Xu2.   

Abstract

Medical devices are a critical component in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases of the alimentary tract. The United States Food and Drug Administration database was mined for high-risk medical device development via the pre-market approval (PMA) pathway from 2000 to 2014. In total, there were only nine GI (gastrointestinal) devices approved during this period. Furthermore, only one GI device was granted expedited review. The clinical studies leading to approval were mostly limited to non-blinded, non-randomized studies. Only a minority of pivotal studies defined and met their primary endpoints (27 %). Eight out of nine devices were required to undergo post-marketing studies. Ultimately, cardiology led with 157 total approvals in the time period studied. GI ranked 12 out of 18 across various medical and surgical specialties and accounted for <2 % of total PMA approvals. Future efforts should focus on spurring more high-risk device innovation in the field.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Device approval; FDA; Gastroenterology; Medical devices

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27003144     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-016-4117-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  31 in total

Review 1.  Burden of digestive diseases in the United States part I: overall and upper gastrointestinal diseases.

Authors:  James E Everhart; Constance E Ruhl
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-01-03       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  Strength of study evidence examined by the FDA in premarket approval of cardiovascular devices.

Authors:  Sanket S Dhruva; Lisa A Bero; Rita F Redberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Modeling of the medical device development process.

Authors:  Isa C T Santos; G Scott Gazelle; Luís A Rocha; João Manuel R S Tavares
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 4.  Gastroenterology and biodesign: contributing to the future of our specialty.

Authors:  Ashish Nimgaonkar; Paul G Yock; Todd J Brinton; Tom Krummel; Pankaj Jay Pasricha
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 5.  Additional peculiarities of medical devices that should be considered in their development process.

Authors:  Isa C T Santos; João Manuel R S Tavares
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.166

6.  Improving medical device regulation: the United States and Europe in perspective.

Authors:  Corinna Sorenson; Michael Drummond
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.911

7.  Gastrointestinal endoscopes: a need to shift from disinfection to sterilization?

Authors:  William A Rutala; David J Weber
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  The era of modern medicine: implants and all.

Authors:  Kaushik Guha; Rakesh Sharma
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03-13

Review 9.  How does medical device regulation perform in the United States and the European union? A systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel B Kramer; Shuai Xu; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Clinicians' contributions to the development of coronary artery stents: a qualitative study of transformative device innovation.

Authors:  Aaron S Kesselheim; Shuai Xu; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.