| Literature DB >> 27002937 |
Yi-Peng Fu1, Yong Yi1, Xiao-Yan Cai1, Jian Sun1, Xiao-Chun Ni1, Hong-Wei He1, Jia-Xing Wang1, Zhu-Feng Lu1, Jin-Long Huang1, Ya Cao2, Jian Zhou1, Jia Fan1, Shuang-Jian Qiu1,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aberrant expression of interleukin-35 (IL-35) has been implicated in dampening antitumour immunity. The aim of this study was to explore the prognostic significance of IL-35 expression in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following curative resection. Furthermore, we aimed to formulate an effective prognostic nomogram for HCC after hepatectomy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27002937 PMCID: PMC4984866 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.47
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Correlation of intratumoral IL-35 expression and clinicopathologic characteristics in the training and validation set of patients with HCC
| All patients | 210 | 100 | 99 | 111 | 138 | 100 | 64 | 74 | ||
| Age | 0.052 | 0.362 | ||||||||
| ⩽52 | 102 | 48.6 | 52 | 50 | 70 | 50.7 | 34 | 36 | ||
| >52 | 108 | 51.4 | 42 | 66 | 68 | 49.3 | 30 | 38 | ||
| Gender | 0.456 | 0.201 | ||||||||
| Male | 176 | 83.8 | 78 | 98 | 119 | 86.2 | 53 | 66 | ||
| Female | 34 | 16.2 | 16 | 18 | 19 | 13.8 | 11 | 8 | ||
| HBsAg | 0.574 | 0.261 | ||||||||
| Positive | 171 | 84.2 | 75 | 96 | 117 | 86 | 56 | 61 | ||
| Negative | 32 | 15.8 | 14 | 18 | 19 | 14 | 7 | 12 | ||
| AFP (ng ml−1) | 0.07 | 0.161 | ||||||||
| ⩽20 | 86 | 41 | 44 | 42 | 48 | 34.8 | 19 | 29 | ||
| >20 | 124 | 59 | 50 | 74 | 90 | 65.2 | 45 | 45 | ||
| GGT (units l−1) | 0.307 | 0.565 | ||||||||
| ⩽54 | 111 | 52.9 | 52 | 59 | 56 | 40.6 | 26 | 30 | ||
| >54 | 99 | 47.1 | 42 | 57 | 82 | 59.4 | 38 | 44 | ||
| Liver cirrhosis | 0.523 | |||||||||
| Yes | 175 | 83.3 | 78 | 79 | 119 | 86.2 | 59 | 60 | ||
| No | 35 | 16.7 | 16 | 19 | 19 | 13.8 | 4 | 14 | ||
| Tumour size (cm) | 0.471 | |||||||||
| ⩽5 | 143 | 68.1 | 73 | 70 | 77 | 55.8 | 35 | 42 | ||
| >5 | 67 | 31.9 | 21 | 46 | 61 | 44.2 | 29 | 32 | ||
| Tumour encapsulation | 0.232 | 0.353 | ||||||||
| None | 90 | 42.9 | 39 | 51 | 66 | 47.8 | 29 | 37 | ||
| Complete | 120 | 57.1 | 55 | 65 | 72 | 52.2 | 35 | 37 | ||
| Tumour multiplicity | 0.142 | 0.237 | ||||||||
| Single | 183 | 87.1 | 85 | 98 | 121 | 87.7 | 58 | 63 | ||
| Multiple | 27 | 12.9 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 12.3 | 6 | 11 | ||
| Tumour differentiation | 0.141 | 0.368 | ||||||||
| I–II | 159 | 75.7 | 75 | 84 | 100 | 72.5 | 45 | 55 | ||
| III–IV | 51 | 24.3 | 19 | 32 | 38 | 27.5 | 19 | 19 | ||
| Vascular invasion | 0.504 | 0.58 | ||||||||
| Yes | 66 | 31.4 | 30 | 36 | 28 | 20.3 | 13 | 15 | ||
| No | 144 | 68.6 | 64 | 80 | 110 | 79.7 | 51 | 59 | ||
| BCLC stage | ||||||||||
| A | 143 | 68.1 | 73 | 70 | 97 | 70.3 | 54 | 43 | ||
| B | 63 | 30 | 20 | 43 | 37 | 26.8 | 9 | 27 | ||
| C | 4 | 1.9 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2.9 | 1 | 4 | ||
Abbreviations: AFP=α-fetoprotein; BCLC=Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; GGT= γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; HBsAg=hepatitis B virus surface antigen; HCC=hepatocellular carcinoma; IL-35=interleukin-35. P-value <0.05 marked in bold font shows statistical significant.
Figure 1Interleukin-35 (IL-35) expression in sections of HCC tissue samples. In the tumour area, IL-35 expression was evenly scattered throughout the specimens. Representative microphotographs of IL-35 expression (A–F). Intratumoral negative control (A); intratumoral weak intensity (B); intratumoral moderate intensity (C); intratumoral strong intensity (D); tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (arrow) (E); and endothelial cells (arrowhead) (F). Original magnification × 200.
Univariate analyses of prognostic factors associated with recurrence-free survival
| Age, years (>52 | 1.275 | 0.867–1.875 | 0.216 | 1.083 | 0.681–1.723 | 0.735 |
| Gender (female | 0.853 | 0.513–1.418 | 0.547 | 0.947 | 0.496–1.808 | 0.871 |
| HBsAg (positive | 2.43 | 1.226–4.819 | 1.227 | 0.609–2.473 | 0.557 | |
| AFP, ng ml−1 (>20 | 1.755 | 1.162–2.650 | 1.286 | 0.783–2.111 | 0.314 | |
| GGT, units l−1 (>54 | 1.785 | 1.213–2.628 | 1.735 | 1.056–2.849 | ||
| Liver cirrhosis (yes | 1.306 | 0.744–2.294 | 0.337 | 1.002 | 0.478–1.729 | 0.773 |
| Tumour differentiation (III–IV | 1.756 | 1.161–2.655 | 1.012 | 0.569–1.626 | 0.885 | |
| Tumour size, cm (>5 | 2.318 | 1.566–3.431 | 1.769 | 1.113–2.811 | ||
| Tumour multiplicity (multiple | 1.986 | 1.218–3.237 | 1.134 | 0.581–2.217 | 0.712 | |
| Tumour encapsulation (none | 1.437 | 0.98–2.108 | 0.065 | 1.001 | 0.54–1.361 | 0.513 |
| Vascular invasion (yes | 2.095 | 1.416–3.102 | 2.058 | 1.225–3.457 | ||
| BCLC stage (C | 2.079 | 1.432–3.019 | 2.215 | 1.447–3.391 | ||
| IL-35 (high | 2.764 | 1.796–4.252 | 2.718 | 1.630–4.535 | ||
| Foxp3+ TILs (high | 1.715 | 1.026–2.865 | 1.755 | 0.868–3.550 | 0.094 | |
| CD39+Foxp3+ TILs (high | 1.842 | 1.134–2.991 | 2.077 | 1.027–4.201 | ||
Abbreviations: AFP=α-fetoprotein; BCLC=Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; CI=confidence interval; GGT=γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; HBsAg=hepatitis B virus surface antigen; HR=hazard ratio; IL-35=interleukin-35; TIL=tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte. P-value <0.05 marked in bold font shows statistical significant.
Figure 2Kaplan–Meier curves for RFS of patients with HCC according to the expression of IL-35 and the number of infiltrating CD39 Recurrence-free survival (RFS) for expression of IL-35 (A), the number of infiltrating CD39+Foxp3+ Tregs (B) and their combination (C) was found to be statistically significant. Significant differences in RFS were further validated in an independent validation cohort (D–F). The P-values were determined by the log-rank test.
Multivariate analyses of prognostic factors associated with recurrence-free survival
| HBsAg (positive | 1.802 | 0.887–3.664 | 0.104 | |||
| AFP, ng ml−1 (>20 | 1.471 | 0.939–2.304 | 0.092 | |||
| GGT, units l−1 (>54 | 1.522 | 0.987–2.346 | 0.057 | 1.372 | 0.787–2.390 | 0.265 |
| Tumour differentiation (III–IV | 1.374 | 0.877–2.152 | 0.165 | |||
| Tumour size, cm (>5 | 1.914 | 1.236–2.964 | 1.679 | 1.018–2.770 | ||
| Tumour multiplicity (multiple | 1.603 | 0.939–2.738 | 0.084 | |||
| Vascular invasion (yes | 1.798 | 1.162–2.783 | 2.044 | 1.183–3.531 | ||
| IL-35 (high | 2.878 | 1.925–4.929 | 2.874 | 1.725–5.196 | ||
| Foxp3+ TILs (high | 1.357 | 0.788–2.337 | 0.271 | |||
| CD39+Foxp3+ TILs (high | 1.664 | 1.012–2.737 | 1.94 | 0.954–3.944 | ||
Abbreviations: AFP=α-fetoprotein; CI=confidence interval; GGT=γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; HBsAg=hepatitis B virus surface antigen; HR=hazard ratio; IL-35=interleukin-35; TIL=tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte. P-value <0.05 marked in bold font shows statistical significant.
Figure 3Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) RFS nomogram, calibration curve and decision curve analysis. (A) Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) RFS nomogram (to use the nomogram, an individual patient's value is located on each variable axis, and a line is drawn upwards to determine the number of points received for each variable value. The sum of these numbers is located on the Total Points axis, and a line is drawn downwards to the survival axes to determine the likelihood of 3- or 5-year RFS). The calibration curve for predicting RFS at (B) 3 years, (C) 4 years and (D) 5 years in training cohort and at (E) 3 years, (F) 4 years and (G) 5 years in the validation cohort. Nomogram-predicted probability of overall survival is plotted on the x axis and actual overall survival is plotted on the y axis. Decision curve analyses depict the clinical net benefit in pairwise comparisons across the different models. Nomogram is compared with the BCLC stage in terms of (H) 3-year and (I) 5-year RFS in training cohort and (J) 5-year RFS in validation cohort. Dashed lines indicate the net benefit of nomogram in each of the curves across a range of threshold probabilities. The horizontal solid black line represents the assumptions that no patient will experience the event, and the solid grey line represents the assumption that all patients will relapse. On decision curve analysis, nomogram showed superior net benefit compared with BCLC stage across a range of threshold probabilities.