Literature DB >> 27002592

Demographic responses to weather fluctuations are context dependent in a long-lived amphibian.

Hugo Cayuela1,2, Dragan Arsovski2, Jean-Marc Thirion3, Eric Bonnaire4, Julian Pichenot5, Sylvain Boitaud1, Claude Miaud2, Pierre Joly1, Aurélien Besnard2.   

Abstract

Weather fluctuations have been demonstrated to affect demographic traits in many species. In long-lived organisms, their impact on adult survival might be buffered by the evolution of traits that reduce variation in interannual adult survival. For example, skipping breeding is an effective behavioral mechanism that may limit yearly variation in adult survival when harsh weather conditions occur; however, this in turn would likely lead to strong variation in recruitment. Yet, only a few studies to date have examined the impact of weather variation on survival, recruitment and breeding probability simultaneously in different populations of the same species. To fill this gap, we studied the impact of spring temperatures and spring rainfall on survival, on reproductive skipping behavior and on recruitment in five populations of a long-lived amphibian, the yellow-bellied toad (Bombina variegata). Based on capture-recapture data, our findings demonstrate that survival depends on interactions between age, population and weather variation. Varying weather conditions in the spring result in strong variation in the survival of immature toads, whereas they have little effect on adult toads. Breeding probability depends on both the individual's previous reproductive status and on the weather conditions during the current breeding season, leading to high interannual variation in recruitment. Crucially, we found that the impact of weather variation on demographic traits is largely context dependent and may thus differ sharply between populations. Our results suggest that studies predicting the impact of climate change on population dynamics should be taken with caution when the relationship between climate and demographic traits is established using only one population or few populations. We therefore highly recommend further research that includes surveys replicated in a substantial number of populations to account for context-dependent variation in demographic processes.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bombina variegata; amphibian; climate; demographic responses; recruitment; skipping behavior; survival; weather fluctuation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27002592     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  9 in total

1.  Climatic influences on the breeding biology of the agile frog (Rana dalmatina).

Authors:  Magali Combes; David Pinaud; Christophe Barbraud; Jacques Trotignon; François Brischoux
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-12-19

2.  climwin: An R Toolbox for Climate Window Analysis.

Authors:  Liam D Bailey; Martijn van de Pol
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Transport infrastructure severely impacts amphibian dispersal regardless of life stage.

Authors:  Hugo Cayuela; Éric Bonnaire; Guillelme Astruc; Aurélien Besnard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Weather and food availability additively affect reproductive output in an expanding raptor population.

Authors:  Melanie Nägeli; Patrick Scherler; Stephanie Witczak; Benedetta Catitti; Adrian Aebischer; Valentijn van Bergen; Urs Kormann; Martin U Grüebler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Effects of elevated temperature, reduced hydroperiod, and invasive bullfrog larvae on pacific chorus frog larvae.

Authors:  Bailey R Tasker; Karli N Honebein; Allie M Erickson; Julia E Misslin; Paul Hurst; Sarah Cooney; Skylar Riley; Scott A Griffith; Betsy A Bancroft
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Heterogeneous responses of temperate-zone amphibian populations to climate change complicates conservation planning.

Authors:  E Muths; T Chambert; B R Schmidt; D A W Miller; B R Hossack; P Joly; O Grolet; D M Green; D S Pilliod; M Cheylan; R N Fisher; R M McCaffery; M J Adams; W J Palen; J W Arntzen; J Garwood; G Fellers; J-M Thirion; A Besnard; E H Campbell Grant
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Resilience to climate variation in a spatially structured amphibian population.

Authors:  A Weinbach; H Cayuela; O Grolet; A Besnard; P Joly
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Quantifying climate sensitivity and climate-driven change in North American amphibian communities.

Authors:  David A W Miller; Evan H Campbell Grant; Erin Muths; Staci M Amburgey; Michael J Adams; Maxwell B Joseph; J Hardin Waddle; Pieter T J Johnson; Maureen E Ryan; Benedikt R Schmidt; Daniel L Calhoun; Courtney L Davis; Robert N Fisher; David M Green; Blake R Hossack; Tracy A G Rittenhouse; Susan C Walls; Larissa L Bailey; Sam S Cruickshank; Gary M Fellers; Thomas A Gorman; Carola A Haas; Ward Hughson; David S Pilliod; Steven J Price; Andrew M Ray; Walt Sadinski; Daniel Saenz; William J Barichivich; Adrianne Brand; Cheryl S Brehme; Rosi Dagit; Katy S Delaney; Brad M Glorioso; Lee B Kats; Patrick M Kleeman; Christopher A Pearl; Carlton J Rochester; Seth P D Riley; Mark Roth; Brent H Sigafus
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Seasonal differences in climate change explain a lack of multi-decadal shifts in population characteristics of a pond breeding salamander.

Authors:  Mark A Kirk; Mark L Galatowitsch; Scott A Wissinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.