Jinho Yoo1, Bo-Hyung Kim2, Soo-Hwan Kim1, Yangseok Kim1,3, Sung-Vin Yim4. 1. Bio-Age Medical Research Institute, Bio-Age Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine and Hospital, 23 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 130-872, Republic of Korea. 3. College of Oriental Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 4. Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine and Hospital, 23 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 130-872, Republic of Korea. ysvin@khu.ac.kr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The study aimed to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that significantly influenced the level of improvement of two kinds of training responses, including maximal O2 uptake (V'O2max) and knee peak torque of healthy adults participating in the high intensity training (HIT) program. The study also aimed to use these SNPs to develop prediction models for individual training responses. METHODS: 79 Healthy volunteers participated in the HIT program. A genome-wide association study, based on 2,391,739 SNPs, was performed to identify SNPs that were significantly associated with gains in V'O2max and knee peak torque, following 9 weeks of the HIT program. To predict two training responses, two independent SNPs sets were determined using linear regression and iterative binary logistic regression analysis. False discovery rate analysis and permutation tests were performed to avoid false-positive findings. RESULTS: To predict gains in V'O2max, 7 SNPs were identified. These SNPs accounted for 26.0 % of the variance in the increment of V'O2max, and discriminated the subjects into three subgroups, non-responders, medium responders, and high responders, with prediction accuracy of 86.1 %. For the knee peak torque, 6 SNPs were identified, and accounted for 27.5 % of the variance in the increment of knee peak torque. The prediction accuracy discriminating the subjects into the three subgroups was estimated as 77.2 %. CONCLUSIONS: Novel SNPs found in this study could explain, and predict inter-individual variability in gains of V'O2max, and knee peak torque. Furthermore, with these genetic markers, a methodology suggested in this study provides a sound approach for the personalized training program.
PURPOSE: The study aimed to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that significantly influenced the level of improvement of two kinds of training responses, including maximal O2 uptake (V'O2max) and knee peak torque of healthy adults participating in the high intensity training (HIT) program. The study also aimed to use these SNPs to develop prediction models for individual training responses. METHODS: 79 Healthy volunteers participated in the HIT program. A genome-wide association study, based on 2,391,739 SNPs, was performed to identify SNPs that were significantly associated with gains in V'O2max and knee peak torque, following 9 weeks of the HIT program. To predict two training responses, two independent SNPs sets were determined using linear regression and iterative binary logistic regression analysis. False discovery rate analysis and permutation tests were performed to avoid false-positive findings. RESULTS: To predict gains in V'O2max, 7 SNPs were identified. These SNPs accounted for 26.0 % of the variance in the increment of V'O2max, and discriminated the subjects into three subgroups, non-responders, medium responders, and high responders, with prediction accuracy of 86.1 %. For the knee peak torque, 6 SNPs were identified, and accounted for 27.5 % of the variance in the increment of knee peak torque. The prediction accuracy discriminating the subjects into the three subgroups was estimated as 77.2 %. CONCLUSIONS: Novel SNPs found in this study could explain, and predict inter-individual variability in gains of V'O2max, and knee peak torque. Furthermore, with these genetic markers, a methodology suggested in this study provides a sound approach for the personalized training program.
Authors: Sujoy Ghosh; Juan C Vivar; Mark A Sarzynski; Yun Ju Sung; James A Timmons; Claude Bouchard; Tuomo Rankinen Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2013-08-29
Authors: James A Timmons; Steen Knudsen; Tuomo Rankinen; Lauren G Koch; Mark Sarzynski; Thomas Jensen; Pernille Keller; Camilla Scheele; Niels B J Vollaard; Søren Nielsen; Thorbjörn Akerström; Ormond A MacDougald; Eva Jansson; Paul L Greenhaff; Mark A Tarnopolsky; Luc J C van Loon; Bente K Pedersen; Carl Johan Sundberg; Claes Wahlestedt; Steven L Britton; Claude Bouchard Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2010-02-04
Authors: Kirsten A Burgomaster; Krista R Howarth; Stuart M Phillips; Mark Rakobowchuk; Maureen J Macdonald; Sean L McGee; Martin J Gibala Journal: J Physiol Date: 2007-11-08 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Hashbullah Ismail; James R McFarlane; A Hadi Nojoumian; Gudrun Dieberg; Neil A Smart Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2013-10-23 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: A Zarebska; Z Jastrzebski; M Kaczmarczyk; K Ficek; A Maciejewska-Karlowska; M Sawczuk; A Leońska-Duniec; P Krol; P Cieszczyk; P Zmijewski; N Eynon Journal: Biol Sport Date: 2014-09-12 Impact factor: 2.806
Authors: Christopher G Vann; Robert W Morton; Christopher B Mobley; Ivan J Vechetti; Brian K Ferguson; Cody T Haun; Shelby C Osburn; Casey L Sexton; Carlton D Fox; Matthew A Romero; Paul A Roberson; Sara Y Oikawa; Chris McGlory; Kaelin C Young; John J McCarthy; Stuart M Phillips; Michael D Roberts Journal: FASEB J Date: 2021-05 Impact factor: 5.191