BACKGROUND: Innovations in transfusion medicine require randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) to demonstrate safety and efficacy before approval; however, these studies are costly and limited in scope and may be underpowered to detect rare adverse events (AEs). Regulatory agencies, such as the Food and Drug Administration, require postmarketing surveillance, hemovigilance (HV), and controlled Phase IV studies to monitor performance and confirm safety. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The INTERCEPT Blood System (IBS) is an illustrative model for implementation of a transformative technology for which sponsored active HV, regulatory authority HV, and Phase IV studies were used to extend preapproval efficacy and safety information. RESULTS: After CE mark registration in Europe, 13,644 patients received 76,346 IBS components prepared largely without gamma irradiation or bacterial screening in sponsored active HV studies documenting no increased incidence of AEs compared to historical controls and no increased component utilization. National HV systems in France and Switzerland specifically demonstrated no transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease or increased incidence of transfusion-associated acute lung injury, after transfusion of 317,669 IBS platelet (PLT) components, and significant reduction of transfusion-transmitted bacterial infection as well as acute transfusion reactions. Cumulatively, these studies provide new information about safety and efficacy of IBS PLT and plasma components not obtainable from RCTs. CONCLUSION: Although inherently different from RCTs, properly designed postmarketing studies are informative regarding the safety and efficacy of innovative transfusion technologies in large patient populations under conditions of routine use.
BACKGROUND: Innovations in transfusion medicine require randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) to demonstrate safety and efficacy before approval; however, these studies are costly and limited in scope and may be underpowered to detect rare adverse events (AEs). Regulatory agencies, such as the Food and Drug Administration, require postmarketing surveillance, hemovigilance (HV), and controlled Phase IV studies to monitor performance and confirm safety. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The INTERCEPT Blood System (IBS) is an illustrative model for implementation of a transformative technology for which sponsored active HV, regulatory authority HV, and Phase IV studies were used to extend preapproval efficacy and safety information. RESULTS: After CE mark registration in Europe, 13,644 patients received 76,346 IBS components prepared largely without gamma irradiation or bacterial screening in sponsored active HV studies documenting no increased incidence of AEs compared to historical controls and no increased component utilization. National HV systems in France and Switzerland specifically demonstrated no transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease or increased incidence of transfusion-associated acute lung injury, after transfusion of 317,669 IBS platelet (PLT) components, and significant reduction of transfusion-transmitted bacterial infection as well as acute transfusion reactions. Cumulatively, these studies provide new information about safety and efficacy of IBS PLT and plasma components not obtainable from RCTs. CONCLUSION: Although inherently different from RCTs, properly designed postmarketing studies are informative regarding the safety and efficacy of innovative transfusion technologies in large patient populations under conditions of routine use.
Authors: Giovanni Di Minno; David Navarro; Carlo Federico Perno; Mariana Canaro; Lutz Gürtler; James W Ironside; Hermann Eichler; Andreas Tiede Journal: Ann Hematol Date: 2017-06-18 Impact factor: 3.673
Authors: Joycelyn Sim; Wai Chiu Tsoi; Cheuk Kwong Lee; Rock Leung; Clarence C K Lam; Claudia Koontz; Amy Yingjie Liu; Norman Huang; Richard J Benjamin; Hans J Vermeij; Adonis Stassinopoulos; Laurence Corash; Albert K W Lie Journal: Transfusion Date: 2019-03-28 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Veronika Brixner; Gesine Bug; Petra Pohler; Doris Krämer; Bernd Metzner; Andreas Voss; Jochen Casper; Ulrich Ritter; Stefan Klein; Nael Alakel; Rudolf Peceny; Hans G Derigs; Frank Stegelmann; Martin Wolf; Hubert Schrezenmeier; Thomas Thiele; Erhard Seifried; Hans-Hermann Kapels; Andrea Döscher; Eduard K Petershofen; Thomas H Müller; Axel Seltsam Journal: Haematologica Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Edward L Snyder; Allison P Wheeler; Majed Refaai; Claudia S Cohn; Jessica Poisson; Magali Fontaine; Mary Sehl; Ajay K Nooka; Lynne Uhl; Philip Spinella; Maly Fenelus; Darla Liles; Thomas Coyle; Joanne Becker; Michael Jeng; Eric A Gehrie; Bryan R Spencer; Pampee Young; Andrew Johnson; Jennifer J O'Brien; Gary J Schiller; John D Roback; Elizabeth Malynn; Ronald Jackups; Scott T Avecilla; Jin-Sying Lin; Kathy Liu; Stanley Bentow; Ho-Lan Peng; Jeanne Varrone; Richard J Benjamin; Laurence M Corash Journal: Transfusion Date: 2022-06-24 Impact factor: 3.337
Authors: Simona Stivala; Sara Gobbato; Laura Infanti; Martin F Reiner; Nicole Bonetti; Sara C Meyer; Giovanni G Camici; Thomas F Lüscher; Andreas Buser; Jürg H Beer Journal: Haematologica Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 9.941