Literature DB >> 27001077

How Does Scale of Implementation Impact the Environmental Sustainability of Wastewater Treatment Integrated with Resource Recovery?

Pablo K Cornejo1, Qiong Zhang1, James R Mihelcic1.   

Abstract

Energy and resource consumptions required to treat and transport wastewater have led to efforts to improve the environmental sustainability of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Resource recovery can reduce the environmental impact of these systems; however, limited research has considered how the scale of implementation impacts the sustainability of WWTPs integrated with resource recovery. Accordingly, this research uses life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate how the scale of implementation impacts the environmental sustainability of wastewater treatment integrated with water reuse, energy recovery, and nutrient recycling. Three systems were selected: a septic tank with aerobic treatment at the household scale, an advanced water reclamation facility at the community scale, and an advanced water reclamation facility at the city scale. Three sustainability indicators were considered: embodied energy, carbon footprint, and eutrophication potential. This study determined that as with economies of scale, there are benefits to centralization of WWTPs with resource recovery in terms of embodied energy and carbon footprint; however, the community scale was shown to have the lowest eutrophication potential. Additionally, technology selection, nutrient control practices, system layout, and topographical conditions may have a larger impact on environmental sustainability than the implementation scale in some cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27001077     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b05055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  3 in total

1.  Energy and greenhouse gas life cycle assessment and cost analysis of aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactor systems: Influence of scale, population density, climate, and methane recovery.

Authors:  Sarah Cashman; Xin Ma; Janet Mosley; Jay Garland; Brian Crone; Xiaobo Xue
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 9.642

2.  Energy use and carbon footprints differ dramatically for diverse wastewater-derived carbonaceous substrates: An integrated exploration of biokinetics and life-cycle assessment.

Authors:  Yanbo Li; Xu Wang; David Butler; Junxin Liu; Jiuhui Qu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Evolving wastewater infrastructure paradigm to enhance harmony with nature.

Authors:  Xu Wang; Glen Daigger; Duu-Jong Lee; Junxin Liu; Nan-Qi Ren; Jiuhui Qu; Gang Liu; David Butler
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 14.136

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.