Luis R Hoyos1, Jocelyn Leon-Peters2, Jay M Berman3, Michael Hertz4. 1. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Wayne State University/Hutzel Women's Hospital, 3990 John R, 7-Brush N, Mail Box 165, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA. Electronic address: lhoyosma@med.wayne.edu. 2. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Wayne State University/Hutzel Women's Hospital, 3990 John R, 7-Brush N, Mail Box 165, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA. Electronic address: jleonpet@med.wayne.edu. 3. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Wayne State University/Hutzel Women's Hospital, 3990 John R, 7-Brush N, Mail Box 165, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA. Electronic address: jberman@med.wayne.edu. 4. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Wayne State University/Hutzel Women's Hospital, 3990 John R, 7-Brush N, Mail Box 165, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA. Electronic address: mhertz@med.wayne.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Hysteroscopic sterilization (HS) has become one of the most common permanent contraception methods in the U.S. However, recent evidence suggests that the failure rate may be higher than previously reported. We describe women with a history of HS presenting for abortion at a 3-site urban abortion clinic. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series of patients with previous HS who presented to a 3-site urban abortion clinic for pregnancy termination from October 2012 to February 2015. RESULTS: In 28months, 9 patients with prior HS had failure of the method and then an abortion. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies a number of failures from a setting previously unaccounted. It suggests that perhaps the failure rate is higher than previously reported. The cases here presented, from a 3-site urban abortion clinic over 28months, almost match and sometimes surpass the number of failures reported in multicenter case series in the literature. Surveys of other abortion clinics in the U.S. and elsewhere might also discover other patients whose HS had failed. IMPLICATIONS: We identified a number of hysteroscopic sterilization failures at termination of pregnancy at a 3-site urban abortion clinic. We hypothesize that the HS failure rate underestimates the true method failure because previous analysis have excluded cases such as these.
OBJECTIVE: Hysteroscopic sterilization (HS) has become one of the most common permanent contraception methods in the U.S. However, recent evidence suggests that the failure rate may be higher than previously reported. We describe women with a history of HS presenting for abortion at a 3-site urban abortion clinic. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series of patients with previous HS who presented to a 3-site urban abortion clinic for pregnancy termination from October 2012 to February 2015. RESULTS: In 28months, 9 patients with prior HS had failure of the method and then an abortion. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies a number of failures from a setting previously unaccounted. It suggests that perhaps the failure rate is higher than previously reported. The cases here presented, from a 3-site urban abortion clinic over 28months, almost match and sometimes surpass the number of failures reported in multicenter case series in the literature. Surveys of other abortion clinics in the U.S. and elsewhere might also discover other patients whose HS had failed. IMPLICATIONS: We identified a number of hysteroscopic sterilization failures at termination of pregnancy at a 3-site urban abortion clinic. We hypothesize that the HS failure rate underestimates the true method failure because previous analysis have excluded cases such as these.