Literature DB >> 27000909

Establishment of a new robotic prostatectomy program at a tertiary Veteran's Affairs medical center.

Blake W Moore1,2, Mary Ellen T Dolat1,2, Daniel McPartlin1,2, B Mayer Grob1,2, Georgi Guruli1,2, Lance J Hampton3,4,5.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to report the initial results of a newly established robotic prostatectomy (DVP) program at a Veteran's Affairs (VA) medical center. All patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy during the first 18 months of our robotic surgical program were included in this study. These patients were compared to a control group that included all patients who underwent an open prostatectomy 18 months prior to starting our robotic program. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data was compared between open and robotic prostatectomies. 38 men underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) between September 2007 and February 2009. With the introduction of robotic prostatectomy, the total number of prostatectomies increased by 84 % to 70 (9 RRP, 61 DVP). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score and clinical stage were similar for both groups. Average estimated blood loss (EBL) was 1205 mL for RRP and 126 mL for DVP. Mean operative times in minutes were 259 and 254 for RRP and DVP, respectively. Complications included two rectal perforations, a cerebrovascular accident, one death after RRP and one open conversion for failure to progress. Average length of stay was 5.1 for RRP and 1.8 days for DVP. Total positive margins were 24 % for RRP and 15 % for DVP. For T2-specific disease, 16.7 % had positive margins after RRP compared to 4.3 % after DVP. The establishment of a robotic prostatectomy program at a tertiary VA medical center was achieved in a safe and efficient manner with improvement in EBL and length of stay when compared to our open prostatectomies. Oncologic outcomes were equivalent when compared to other initial DVP programs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy; Robot-assisted; Veteran’s Affairs

Year:  2012        PMID: 27000909     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-012-0364-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  14 in total

1.  Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon's outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas E Ahlering; David Woo; Louis Eichel; David I Lee; Robert Edwards; Douglas W Skarecky
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  The cost of learning robotic-assisted prostatectomy.

Authors:  Peter L Steinberg; Paul A Merguerian; William Bihrle; John D Seigne
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  Robotic radical prostatectomy: long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Geoffrey N Box; Thomas E Ahlering
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.309

4.  Rapid implementation of a robot-assisted prostatectomy program in a large health maintenance organization setting.

Authors:  Eric O Kwon; Tricia C Bautista; Jeremy M Blumberg; Howard Jung; Kirk Tamaddon; Sherif R Aboseif; Stephen G Williams; Gary W Chien
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 5.  Building a robotic program.

Authors:  B Rocco; A Lorusso; R F Coelho; K J Palmer; V R Patel
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.360

6.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience.

Authors:  W W Schuessler; P G Schulam; R V Clayman; L R Kavoussi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 7.  The role of the Veterans Affairs Medical Centers in patient care, surgical education, research and faculty development.

Authors:  Walter E Longo; William Cheadle; Aaron Fink; Robert Kozol; Ralph DePalma; Robert Rege; Leigh Neumayer; John Tarpley; Margaret Tarpley; Ray Joehl; Thomas A Miller; Douglas Rosendale; Kamal Itani
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 8.  Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers.

Authors:  Rafael F Coelho; Bernardo Rocco; Manoj B Patel; Marcelo A Orvieto; Sanket Chauhan; Vincenzo Ficarra; Sara Melegari; Kenneth J Palmer; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jim C Hu; Xiangmei Gu; Stuart R Lipsitz; Michael J Barry; Anthony V D'Amico; Aaron C Weinberg; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: the first 100 patients-improving patient safety and outcomes.

Authors:  Alice K Tsao; Marc D Smaldone; Timothy D Averch; Stephen V Jackman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  1 in total

1.  First 100 consecutive robotic inguinal hernia repairs at a Veterans Affairs hospital.

Authors:  Alyssa K Kosturakis; Kathryn E LaRusso; Nels D Carroll; Michael B Nicholl
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-05-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.