Literature DB >> 27000895

Initial experiences with RoSS surgical simulator in residency training: a validity and model analysis.

Marc Colaco1, Adrian Balica2, Daniel Su3, Joseph Barone3.   

Abstract

Robotic surgery is an important new tool in many surgical procedures, and training curriculums must adapt to this new technology. Robotic surgical simulators have been developed as a means of providing training without the inherent risks of actual surgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the construct validity of the RoSS surgical simulator by correlating simulator performance with amount of time in training and to create a performance model in which time in training is a parameter. A total of eight residents with varying amounts of training were given access to the RoSS surgical simulator and were evaluated on performance of a simulated surgical task. This data was then used to create Akaike information criteria to compare goodness of fit. Participants were also given a questionnaire as to their experience with the simulator and their feelings about the use of simulators in training. Training time and performance within the simulator were shown to have a linear relationship. Correlations were high, with R (2) values of 0.95, 0.94, and 0.86 for each of the three performance metrics. Likelihood ratios were similarly high at 4.25 × 10(9), 10,950, and 362. Participant opinion showed that residents feel that robotic training is an important part of their education and that the simulator is an effective supplement. The RoSS surgical simulator accurately corresponds to training level and is a valid evaluation tool of training experience. These findings are encouraging for the use of robotic simulators in surgical training.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient simulation; Physical education and training; Residency; Robotics

Year:  2012        PMID: 27000895     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-012-0376-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  9 in total

1.  Akaike's Information Criterion and Recent Developments in Information Complexity.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.223

2.  Concurrent and predictive validation of a novel robotic surgery simulator: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Andrew J Hung; Mukul B Patil; Pascal Zehnder; Jie Cai; Casey K Ng; Monish Aron; Inderbir S Gill; Mihir M Desai
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  The current role of medical simulation in american urological residency training programs: an assessment by program directors.

Authors:  Carter Q Le; Deborah J Lightner; Laura VanderLei; Joseph W Segura; Matthew T Gettman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Face validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator.

Authors:  Stéfanie A Seixas-Mikelus; Thenkurussi Kesavadas; Govindarajan Srimathveeravalli; Rameela Chandrasekhar; Gregory E Wilding; Khurshid A Guru
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Validation of Robotic Surgery Simulator (RoSS).

Authors:  Thenkurussi Kesavadas; Andrew Stegemann; Gughan Sathyaseelan; Ashirwad Chowriappa; Govindarajan Srimathveeravalli; Stéfanie Seixas-Mikelus; Rameella Chandrasekhar; Gregory Wilding; Khurshid Guru
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2011

6.  A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Simonetta Fracalanza; Carolina D'Elia; Silvia Secco; Massimo Iafrate; Stefano Cavalleri; Walter Artibani
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  Bernardo Rocco; Deliu-Victor Matei; Sara Melegari; Juan Camilo Ospina; Federica Mazzoleni; Giacomo Errico; Mauro Mastropasqua; Luigi Santoro; Serena Detti; Ottavio de Cobelli
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Validation of a novel virtual reality robotic simulator.

Authors:  Amanjot S Sethi; William J Peine; Yousef Mohammadi; Chandru P Sundaram
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques.

Authors:  Amy E Krambeck; David S DiMarco; Laureano J Rangel; Eric J Bergstralh; Robert P Myers; Michael L Blute; Matthew T Gettman
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 5.588

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Robotic surgery simulation validity and usability comparative analysis.

Authors:  Alyssa Tanaka; Courtney Graddy; Khara Simpson; Manuela Perez; Mireille Truong; Roger Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparative analysis of the functionality of simulators of the da Vinci surgical robot.

Authors:  Roger Smith; Mireille Truong; Manuela Perez
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.