Literature DB >> 27000717

A retrospective cohort study of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors at single institution over 15 years: New proposal for low- and high-grade groups, validation of a nomogram for prognosis, and novel follow-up strategy for liver metastases.

Liangtao Ye1, Huilin Ye1, Quanbo Zhou1, Zhihua Li2, Qing Lin1, Langping Tan1, Wenchao Gao1, Zhiqiang Fu1, Shangyou Zheng1, Rufu Chen3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) exhibit various tumor behaviors and symptoms that are difficult for physicians to stage and predict prognosis. We assess prognostic factors combined with staging classifications to optimal the models and try to improve follow-up strategy to monitor liver metastases after surgery.
METHODS: Patients with PNETs treated at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital between 2000 and 2015 were recruited. Patients were regrouped on the basis of functional status and mitotic rates. Nomograms to predict the prognostic values of classifications (AJCC, ENETS, and WHO) were constructed; the accuracy of the nomograms were quantified by the C-index and calibration plots.
RESULTS: We identified 78 PNETs patients with pathological reports. Correlations with OS in univariate analysis included nonfunctional status (P = 0.002), CgA>200 ng/ml (P < 0.001), Ki-67 (3-20%, P = 0.014; >20%, P < 0.001), and mitotic rate (3-20/10HPF, P = 0.011; >20/10HPF, P < 0.001). By multivariate analysis, nonfunctional status and mitotic rate maintained significance (P = 0.039; 3-20/10HPF, P = 0.015; >20/10HPF, P = 0.007). Evaluating the new proposed system, the difference in OS between low- and high-groups was statistically significant (P = 0.001). The C-index of the regrouped nomograms were higher than that of premise ones (AJCC cohort, 0.605 v 0.576, P < 0.01; ENETS cohort, 0.73 v 0.691, P < 0.01; WHO cohort, 0.678 v 0.603, P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: An prognostic model based on mitotic rates and functional status correlates strongly with survival. PNETs should return visits every 2 months for the first half years, and every 3 months as followed until 2 years after surgery.
Copyright © 2016 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional; Liver metastases; Mitotic rate; Nomogram; Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27000717     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.03.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  11 in total

1.  Nomogram predicting the risk of recurrence after curative-intent resection of primary non-metastatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: An analysis of the U.S. Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group.

Authors:  Katiuscha Merath; Fabio Bagante; Eliza W Beal; Alexandra G Lopez-Aguiar; George Poultsides; Eleftherios Makris; Flavio Rocha; Zaheer Kanji; Sharon Weber; Alexander Fisher; Ryan Fields; Bradley A Krasnick; Kamran Idrees; Paula M Smith; Cliff Cho; Megan Beems; Carl R Schmidt; Mary Dillhoff; Shishir K Maithel; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 2.  Prognostic and predictive factors on overall survival and surgical outcomes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances and controversies.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Tetsuhide Ito; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.512

3.  High-Grade Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Management and Outcomes: A National Cancer Database Study.

Authors:  Olatunji B Alese; Renjian Jiang; Walid Shaib; Christina Wu; Mehmet Akce; Madhusmita Behera; Bassel F El-Rayes
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-11-27

4.  Nomogram individually predicts the overall survival of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Cheng Fang; Wei Wang; Xingyu Feng; Jian Sun; Yu Zhang; Yujie Zeng; Junjiang Wang; Huishan Chen; Muyan Cai; Junzhong Lin; Minhu Chen; Ye Chen; Yong Li; Shengping Li; Jie Chen; Zhiwei Zhou
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Nomogram for individually predicting overall survival in rectal neuroendocrine tumours.

Authors:  Xingyu Feng; Gengzhou Wei; Wei Wang; Yu Zhang; Yujie Zeng; Minhu Chen; Ye Chen; Jie Chen; Zhiwei Zhou; Yong Li
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  CLEC3A, MMP7, and LCN2 as novel markers for predicting recurrence in resected G1 and G2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Masami Miki; Takamasa Oono; Nao Fujimori; Takehiro Takaoka; Ken Kawabe; Yoshihiro Miyasaka; Takao Ohtsuka; Daisuke Saito; Masafumi Nakamura; Yasuyuki Ohkawa; Yoshinao Oda; Mikita Suyama; Tetsuhide Ito; Yoshihiro Ogawa
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 4.452

7.  Prognostic nomogram based on the metastatic lymph node ratio for gastric neuroendocrine tumour: SEER database analysis.

Authors:  Jinluan Li; Yaobin Lin; Youjia Wang; Huaqin Lin; Feifei Lin; Qingyang Zhuang; Xijin Lin; Junxin Wu
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2020-04

8.  A Direct Comparison of Patients With Hereditary and Sporadic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Evaluation of Clinical Course, Prognostic Factors and Genotype-Phenotype Correlations.

Authors:  Przemysław Soczomski; Beata Jurecka-Lubieniecka; Aleksandra Krzywon; Alexander Jorge Cortez; Stanisław Zgliczynski; Natalia Rogozik; Małgorzata Oczko-Wojciechowska; Agnieszka Pawlaczek; Tomasz Bednarczuk; Barbara Jarzab
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 5.555

9.  Surgical resection of primary tumor improves survival of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor with liver metastases.

Authors:  Lianyuan Tao; Dianrong Xiu; Abuduhaibaier Sadula; Chen Ye; Qing Chen; Hanyan Wang; Zhipeng Zhang; Lingfu Zhang; Ming Tao; Chunhui Yuan
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-24

10.  Establishment and validation of an AJCC stage- and histologic grade-based nomogram for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors after surgical resection.

Authors:  Chuanzhao Zhang; Yanxia Wu; Hongkai Zhuang; Dezhi Li; Ye Lin; Zi Yin; Xin Lu; Baohua Hou; Zhixiang Jian
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 3.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.