Lital Ruderman1, Daniel B Ehrlich1, Alicia Roy2,3, Robert H Pietrzak2,3, Ilan Harpaz-Rotem2,3, Ifat Levy1,2,4. 1. Section of Comparative Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 2. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, National Center for PTSD, New Haven, Connecticut. 3. Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 4. Department of Neuroscience, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Psychiatric symptoms typically cut across traditional diagnostic categories. In order to devise individually tailored treatments, there is a need to identify the basic mechanisms that underlie these symptoms. Behavioral economics provides a framework for studying these mechanisms at the behavioral level. Here, we utilized this framework to examine a widely ignored aspect of trauma-related symptomatology-individual uncertainty attitudes-in combat veterans with and without posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). METHODS: Fifty-seven combat veterans, including 30 with PTSD and 27 without PTSD, completed a risk and ambiguity decision-making task that characterizes individual uncertainty attitudes, distinguishing between attitudes toward uncertain outcomes with known ("risk") and unknown ("ambiguity") probabilities, and between attitudes toward uncertain gains and uncertain losses. Participants' choices were used to estimate risk and ambiguity attitudes in the gain and loss domains. RESULTS: Veterans with PTSD were more averse to ambiguity, but not risk, compared to veterans without PTSD, when making choices between possible losses, but not gains. The degree of aversion was associated with anxious arousal (e.g., hypervigilance) symptoms, as well as with the degree of combat exposure. Moreover, ambiguity attitudes fully mediated the association between combat exposure and anxious arousal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide a foundation for prospective studies of the causal association between ambiguity attitudes and trauma-related symptoms, as well as etiologic studies of the neural underpinnings of these behavioral outcomes. More generally, these results demonstrate the potential of neuroeconomic and behavioral economic techniques for devising objective and incentive-compatible diagnostic tools, and investigating the etiology of psychiatric disorders.
BACKGROUND:Psychiatric symptoms typically cut across traditional diagnostic categories. In order to devise individually tailored treatments, there is a need to identify the basic mechanisms that underlie these symptoms. Behavioral economics provides a framework for studying these mechanisms at the behavioral level. Here, we utilized this framework to examine a widely ignored aspect of trauma-related symptomatology-individual uncertainty attitudes-in combat veterans with and without posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). METHODS: Fifty-seven combat veterans, including 30 with PTSD and 27 without PTSD, completed a risk and ambiguity decision-making task that characterizes individual uncertainty attitudes, distinguishing between attitudes toward uncertain outcomes with known ("risk") and unknown ("ambiguity") probabilities, and between attitudes toward uncertain gains and uncertain losses. Participants' choices were used to estimate risk and ambiguity attitudes in the gain and loss domains. RESULTS: Veterans with PTSD were more averse to ambiguity, but not risk, compared to veterans without PTSD, when making choices between possible losses, but not gains. The degree of aversion was associated with anxious arousal (e.g., hypervigilance) symptoms, as well as with the degree of combat exposure. Moreover, ambiguity attitudes fully mediated the association between combat exposure and anxious arousal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide a foundation for prospective studies of the causal association between ambiguity attitudes and trauma-related symptoms, as well as etiologic studies of the neural underpinnings of these behavioral outcomes. More generally, these results demonstrate the potential of neuroeconomic and behavioral economic techniques for devising objective and incentive-compatible diagnostic tools, and investigating the etiology of psychiatric disorders.
Authors: Agnieszka Tymula; Lior A Rosenberg Belmaker; Lital Ruderman; Paul W Glimcher; Ifat Levy Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-09-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Agnieszka Tymula; Lior A Rosenberg Belmaker; Amy K Roy; Lital Ruderman; Kirk Manson; Paul W Glimcher; Ifat Levy Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-10-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: R H Pietrzak; A Feder; C B Schechter; R Singh; L Cancelmo; E J Bromet; C L Katz; D B Reissman; F Ozbay; V Sharma; M Crane; D Harrison; R Herbert; S M Levin; B J Luft; J M Moline; J M Stellman; I G Udasin; R El-Gabalawy; P J Landrigan; S M Southwick Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2013-12-02 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Anna B Konova; Silvia Lopez-Guzman; Adelya Urmanche; Stephen Ross; Kenway Louie; John Rotrosen; Paul W Glimcher Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Emmanuel E Alvarez; Sahar Hafezi; Darla Bonagura; Evan M Kleiman; Anna B Konova Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-05-17 Impact factor: 5.435