Literature DB >> 27000535

Personality and gender differences in global perspective.

David P Schmitt1, Audrey E Long1, Allante McPhearson1, Kirby O'Brien1, Brooke Remmert1, Seema H Shah1.   

Abstract

Men's and women's personalities appear to differ in several respects. Social role theories of development assume gender differences result primarily from perceived gender roles, gender socialization and sociostructural power differentials. As a consequence, social role theorists expect gender differences in personality to be smaller in cultures with more gender egalitarianism. Several large cross-cultural studies have generated sufficient data for evaluating these global personality predictions. Empirically, evidence suggests gender differences in most aspects of personality-Big Five traits, Dark Triad traits, self-esteem, subjective well-being, depression and values-are conspicuously larger in cultures with more egalitarian gender roles, gender socialization and sociopolitical gender equity. Similar patterns are evident when examining objectively measured attributes such as tested cognitive abilities and physical traits such as height and blood pressure. Social role theory appears inadequate for explaining some of the observed cultural variations in men's and women's personalities. Evolutionary theories regarding ecologically-evoked gender differences are described that may prove more useful in explaining global variation in human personality.
© 2016 International Union of Psychological Science.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cross-cultural psychology; Gender differences; Personality

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27000535     DOI: 10.1002/ijop.12265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychol        ISSN: 0020-7594


  23 in total

1.  Religious service attendance typologies and African American substance use: a longitudinal study of the protective effects among young adult men and women.

Authors:  David R Hodge; Shiyou Wu; Qi Wu; Flavio F Marsiglia; Weitao Chen
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  Gender stereotypes can explain the gender-equality paradox.

Authors:  Thomas Breda; Elyès Jouini; Clotilde Napp; Georgia Thebault
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Validation of the Japanese Big Five Scale Short Form in a University Student Sample.

Authors:  Rie Toyomoto; Masatsugu Sakata; Kazufumi Yoshida; Yan Luo; Yukako Nakagami; Taku Iwami; Shuntaro Aoki; Tomonari Irie; Yuji Sakano; Hidemichi Suga; Michihisa Sumi; Hiroshi Ichikawa; Takafumi Watanabe; Aran Tajika; Teruhisa Uwatoko; Ethan Sahker; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-23

4.  Men are less religious in more gender-equal countries.

Authors:  Jordan W Moon; Adam E Tratner; Melissa M McDonald
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Illness uncertainty among patients with COVID-19 in the Mobile Cabin Hospital.

Authors:  Liang Dong; Lei Chen; Shu Ding
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2021-05-17

6.  Being More Educated and Earning More Increases Romantic Interest: Data from 1.8 M Online Daters from 24 Nations.

Authors:  Peter K Jonason; Andrew G Thomas
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2022-04-05

7.  Modus operandi and affect in Sweden: the Swedish version of the Regulatory Mode Questionnaire.

Authors:  Clara Amato; Danilo Garcia; Ali Al Nima; Marko Mihailovic
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Gender differences in psychiatric diagnoses in older people with intellectual disability: a register study.

Authors:  Anna Axmon; Magnus Sandberg; Gerd Ahlström
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.630

9.  Italian and Swedish adolescents: differences and associations in subjective well-being and psychological well-being.

Authors:  Danilo Garcia; Elisabetta Sagone; Maria Elvira De Caroli; Ali Al Nima
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Gender Expression and Its Correlates in a Nationally Representative Sample of the U.S. Adult Population: Findings from the National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior.

Authors:  Theo G M Sandfort; Henny M W Bos; Tsung-Chieh Jane Fu; Debby Herbenick; Brian Dodge
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2020-09-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.