Literature DB >> 27000408

Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Virtual Planning and Surgical Navigation for Mandibular Reconstruction With Free Fibula Flap.

Yao Yu1, Wen-Bo Zhang1, Xiao-Jing Liu2, Chuan-Bin Guo3, Guang-Yan Yu3, Xin Peng4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although free fibula flaps are widely used for mandibular reconstruction, their 3-dimensional position is difficult to control during conventional surgery. We aimed to improve this process by using computer-aided design (CAD) and surgical navigation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 29 benign tumor patients who underwent primary unilateral mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flap. They were divided into 3 groups: group A, comprising 10 patients, underwent reconstruction based on the surgeon's experience; group B, comprising 7 patients, underwent reconstruction based on CAD; and group C, comprising 12 patients, underwent reconstruction based on CAD and surgical navigation. Condyle and gonion positions and mandibular angles were measured. Operative times were recorded.
RESULTS: Among the 17 patients who underwent condylar resection, the average condyle shift was greater in group A than in groups B and C (P < .05). The average gonion shift was greater in groups A and B than in group C (P < .05). The difference between the reconstructed and contralateral mandibular angles was greater in group A than in groups B and C (P < .05). The mean operative time did not differ among the 3 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: CAD can guide mandibular angle remodeling and condyle placement. CAD and surgical navigation increase reconstruction accuracy without prolonging operative time.
Copyright © 2016 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27000408     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.02.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  14 in total

1.  Fibula Free Flap in Head and Neck Reconstruction: Identifying Risk Factors for Flap Failure and Analysis of Postoperative Complications in a Low Volume Setting.

Authors:  Pieter-Jan Verhelst; Flore Dons; Pieter-Jan Van Bever; Joseph Schoenaers; Lloyd Nanhekhan; Constantinus Politis
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2018-06-05

2.  [Application of computer-assisted design for anterolateral thigh flap in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction].

Authors:  S J Wang; W B Zhang; Y Yu; X Y Xie; H Y Yang; X Peng
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-02-18

3.  Navigation Guidance During Free Flap Mandibular Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Trial.

Authors:  R Alex Harbison; Xiao-Feng Shan; Zachary Douglas; Scott Bevans; Yangming Li; Kris S Moe; Neal Futran; Jeffrey J Houlton
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.223

4.  Intraoperative Change in Defect Size during Maxillary Reconstruction Using Surgical Guides Created by CAD/CAM.

Authors:  Daiki Morita; Toshiaki Numajiri; Hiroko Nakamura; Shoko Tsujiko; Yoshihiro Sowa; Makoto Yasuda; Shigeru Hirano
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-04-20

5.  Virtual Planning and 3D printing modeling for mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flap.

Authors:  W Ren; L Gao; S Li; C Chen; F Li; Q Wang; Y Zhi; J Song; Z Dou; L Xue; K Zhi
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2018-05-01

6.  The effect of fixation plate use on bone healing during the reconstruction of mandibular defects.

Authors:  Khang Do Gia Hong; Seong-Gon Kim; Young-Wook Park
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-10-30

7.  Facial Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Current Image Acquisition and Processing Techniques.

Authors:  Sam P Tarassoli; Matthew E Shield; Rhian S Allen; Zita M Jessop; Thomas D Dobbs; Iain S Whitaker
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2020-12-07

8.  Three-Dimensionally Printed Patient-Specific Surgical Plates Increase Accuracy of Oncologic Head and Neck Reconstruction Versus Conventional Surgical Plates: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Wei-Fa Yang; Wing Shan Choi; May Chun-Mei Wong; Warit Powcharoen; Wang-Yong Zhu; James Kit-Hon Tsoi; Marco Chow; Ka-Wai Kwok; Yu-Xiong Su
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Fibula Graft Cutting Devices: Are 3D-Printed Cutting Guides More Precise than a Universal, Reusable Osteotomy Jig?

Authors:  Simon Meyer; Jan-Michaél Hirsch; Christoph S Leiggener; Bilal Msallem; Guido R Sigron; Christoph Kunz; Florian M Thieringer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Accuracy of Mixed Reality Combined With Surgical Navigation Assisted Oral and Maxillofacial Tumor Resection.

Authors:  Zu-Nan Tang; Lei-Hao Hu; Hui Yuh Soh; Yao Yu; Wen-Bo Zhang; Xin Peng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.