Literature DB >> 27000105

Sensor and software use for the glycaemic management of insulin-treated type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients.

Ramzi A Ajjan1, Kamal Abougila2, Srikanth Bellary3, Andrew Collier4, Bernd Franke5, Edward B Jude6, Gerry Rayman7, Anthony Robinson8, Baldev M Singh9.   

Abstract

Lowering glucose levels, while avoiding hypoglycaemia, can be challenging in insulin-treated patients with diabetes. We evaluated the role of ambulatory glucose profile in optimising glycaemic control in this population. Insulin-treated patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes were recruited into a prospective, multicentre, 100-day study and randomised to control (n = 28) or intervention (n = 59) groups. The intervention group used ambulatory glucose profile, generated by continuous glucose monitoring, to assess daily glucose levels, whereas the controls relied on capillary glucose testing. Patients were reviewed at days 30 and 45 by the health care professional to adjust insulin therapy. Comparing first and last 2 weeks of the study, ambulatory glucose profile-monitored type 2 diabetes patients (n = 28) showed increased time in euglycaemia (mean ± standard deviation) by 1.4 ± 3.5 h/day (p = 0.0427) associated with reduction in HbA1c from 77 ± 15 to 67 ± 13 mmol/mol (p = 0.0002) without increased hypoglycaemia. Type 1 diabetes patients (n = 25) showed reduction in hypoglycaemia from 1.4 ± 1.7 to 0.8 ± 0.8 h/day (p = 0.0472) associated with a marginal HbA1c decrease from 75 ± 10 to 72 ± 8 mmol/mol (p = 0.0508). Largely similar findings were observed comparing intervention and control groups at end of study. In conclusion, ambulatory glucose profile helps glycaemic management in insulin-treated diabetes patients by increasing time spent in euglycaemia and decreasing HbA1c in type 2 diabetes patients, while reducing hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes patients.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulatory glucose profile; glycaemia self-monitoring of blood glucose; type 1 diabetes; type 2 diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27000105     DOI: 10.1177/1479164115624680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diab Vasc Dis Res        ISSN: 1479-1641            Impact factor:   3.291


  9 in total

Review 1.  Closing the Loop.

Authors:  Revital Nimri; Nathan Murray; Alexander Ochs; Jordan E Pinsker; Eyal Dassau
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 2.  How Can We Realize the Clinical Benefits of Continuous Glucose Monitoring?

Authors:  Ramzi A Ajjan
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 3.  Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in maintaining glycaemic control among people with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Evelyn Teo; Norasyikin Hassan; Wilson Tam; Serena Koh
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 10.460

4.  Individuals with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Trade Increased Hyperglycemia for Decreased Hypoglycemia When Glycemic Variability is not Improved.

Authors:  Sujit R Jangam; Gary Hayter; Timothy C Dunn
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.945

5.  Reduction in HbA1c using professional flash glucose monitoring in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes patients managed in primary and secondary care settings: A pilot, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Ramzi A Ajjan; Neil Jackson; Scott A Thomson
Journal:  Diab Vasc Dis Res       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.291

Review 6.  Use of continuous glucose monitoring trend arrows in the younger population with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Nancy Elbarbary; Othmar Moser; Saif Al Yaarubi; Hussain Alsaffar; Adnan Al Shaikh; Ramzi A Ajjan; Asma Deeb
Journal:  Diab Vasc Dis Res       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.291

7.  Effect of Different Glucose Monitoring Methods on Bold Glucose Control: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yeling Wang; Congcong Zou; Han Na; Weixin Zeng; Xiaoyan Li
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 2.809

8.  Improvement in Glucose Regulation Using a Digital Tracker and Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Healthy Adults and Those with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Ashkan Dehghani Zahedani; Solmaz Shariat Torbaghan; Salar Rahili; Kirill Karlin; Darrin Scilley; Riya Thakkar; Maziyar Saberi; Noosheen Hashemi; Dalia Perelman; Nima Aghaeepour; Tracey McLaughlin; Michael P Snyder
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.945

9.  Three European Retrospective Real-World Chart Review Studies to Determine the Effectiveness of Flash Glucose Monitoring on HbA1c in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Jens Kröger; Peter Fasching; Hélène Hanaire
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.945

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.