Literature DB >> 27000097

The telephone lifestyle intervention 'Hartcoach' has modest impact on coronary risk factors: A randomised multicentre trial.

Chantal J Leemrijse1, Ron Jg Peters2, Clemens von Birgelen3, Liset van Dijk4, John Mc van Hal5, Aaf Fm Kuijper6, Marjolein Snaterse7, Cindy Veenhof8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unhealthy diets and inactivity are still common among patients with cardiovascular diseases. This study evaluates the effects of the telephonic lifestyle intervention 'Hartcoach' on risk factors and self-management in patients with recent coronary events.
DESIGN: This was a randomised trial in five Dutch hospitals.
METHODS: Patients (18-80 years), less than eight weeks after hospitalisation for acute myocardial infarction or (un)stable angina pectoris were randomised to the Hartcoach-group, who received telephonic coaching every four weeks for a period of six months (in addition to usual care), and a control group receiving usual care only. Simple random allocation was used (without relation to prior assignment). Measurements were taken by research nurses blinded for group allocation. Differences after six months of participation were compared using linear or logistic regression models with treatment-group and baseline score for the outcome under analysis as covariates, resulting in adjusted mean change (b).
RESULTS: Altogether 374 patients were randomised (173 Hartcoach + usual care, 201 usual care only). Follow-up was obtained in 331 patients who still participated after six months. Hartcoach had significant favourable effects on body mass index (BMI) (b = -0.32; 95% CI:(-0.63- -0.003)), waist circumference (b = -1.71; 95% CI:(-2.73- -0.70)), physical activity (b = 15.08 (score); 95% CI:(0.13, 30.04)) daily intake of vegetables (b = 13.41; 95% CI:(1.10-25.71)), self-management (b = 0.11; 95% CI:(0.00-0.23)) and anxiety (b = -0.65; 95% CI:(-1.25- -0.06)). Hartcoach slightly increased the total number of risk scores on target (b = 0.45; 95% CI:(0.17-0.73)).
CONCLUSIONS: Hartcoach has modest impact on BMI, waist circumference, physical activity, intake of vegetables, self-management and anxiety. Therefore, it may be a useful maintenance programme in addition to usual care, to support patients with recent coronary events to improve self-management and reduce risk factors. © The European Society of Cardiology 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lifestyle; cardiovascular diseases; risk factors; self-care

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27000097     DOI: 10.1177/2047487316639681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol        ISSN: 2047-4873            Impact factor:   7.804


  4 in total

1.  Treatment of Anxiety in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Julia M Farquhar; Gregory L Stonerock; James A Blumenthal
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.386

Review 2.  Randomized Trials of Nurse-Delivered Interventions in Weight Management Research: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lucine Petit Francis; Erin Spaulding; Ruth-Alma Turkson-Ocran; Jerilyn Allen
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2017-01-08       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 3.  Does a Nurse-Led Program of Support and Lifestyle Management for patients with coronary artery disease significantly improve psychological outcomes among the patients?: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zu-Chun Luo; Lu Zhai; Xia Dai
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 4.  Comparative Effectiveness of the Core Components of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Mortality and Morbidity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nader N Kabboul; George Tomlinson; Troy A Francis; Sherry L Grace; Gabriela Chaves; Valeria Rac; Tamara Daou-Kabboul; Joanna M Bielecki; David A Alter; Murray Krahn
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.