Literature DB >> 26999701

Contact stress analysis of the anterior tibial post in bi-cruciate stabilized and mobile-bearing posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty designs.

Umito Kuwashima1, Satoshi Hamai2, Ken Okazaki1, Satoru Ikebe3, Hidehiko Higaki3, Hideki Mizu-Uchi1, Yukio Akasaki1, Koji Murakami1, Yukihide Iwamoto1.   

Abstract

In posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA), unexpected wear and fracture of the tibial post due to anterior post impingement have been reported. The purpose of this study was to determine the contact stress on the anterior aspect of the tibial post in four contemporary TKA designs. We evaluated one bi-cruciate stabilized design (Journey II) and three mobile-bearing PS designs (Vanguard RP, PFC Sigma RP, and NexGen LPS Mobile). The contact conditions at the anterior aspect of the tibial post were determined upon application of a posterior force of 100N to individual implants. Each measurement was sequentially performed five times, and the data were compared within and across designs using analysis of variance and a post-hoc test. The contact stress of the Journey II and Vanguard RP was less than the compressive yield stress for polyethylene (10MPa) at all tested flexion angles and degrees of rotation. The PFC Sigma RP did not show anterior tibial post impingement under any experimental conditions. The NexGen LPS Mobile demonstrated bilateral edge loading at the anterior tibial post and exceeded 10MPa of contact stress in some test conditions. Thus, the differences among implants in terms of the dimensions of the femoral anterior cam or intercondylar notch and the anterior aspect of the tibial post in the axial and sagittal planes led to significant differences in contact conditions. The present study helps the surgeon to be more aware that various contact conditions of the anterior aspect of the tibial post can occur in individual TKA designs.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26999701     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  4 in total

1.  Bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty can reduce the risk of knee instability associated with posterior tibial slope.

Authors:  Masaru Hada; Hideki Mizu-Uchi; Ken Okazaki; Takao Kaneko; Koji Murakami; Yuan Ma; Satoshi Hamai; Yasuharu Nakashima
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  In vivo kinematics of gait in posterior-stabilized and bicruciate-stabilized total knee arthroplasties using image-matching techniques.

Authors:  Koji Murakami; Satoshi Hamai; Ken Okazaki; Yifeng Wang; Satoru Ikebe; Hidehiko Higaki; Takeshi Shimoto; Hideki Mizu-Uchi; Yukio Akasaki; Yasuharu Nakashima
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Strain measurements of the tibial insert of a knee prosthesis using a knee motion simulator.

Authors:  Toshihiro Sera; Yuya Iwai; Takaharu Yamazaki; Tetsuya Tomita; Hideki Yoshikawa; Hisahi Naito; Takeshi Matsumoto; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-08-09

4.  Second-generation bi-cruciate stabilized total knee system has a lower reoperation and revision rate than its predecessor.

Authors:  Bernhard Christen; Branko Kopjar
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 3.067

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.