Emma Robertson Blackmore1, Hanna Gustafsson2, Michelle Gilchrist3, Claire Wyman4, Thomas G O'Connor5. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Jacksonville, United States. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health and Science University, United States. 3. Department of Psychology, DePaul University, United States. 4. Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, United States. 5. Wynne Center for Family Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, 300 Crittenden Blvd, Rochester, NY 14642, United States. Electronic address: Tom_OConnor@URMC.Rochester.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pregnancy-related anxiety (PrA) has attracted considerable research attention, but questions remain about its distinctiveness from conventional constructs and measures. In a high psychosocial risk, ethnically diverse sample, we examine the degree to which PrA is distinct from continuous and diagnostic measures of anxiety and worry in terms of longitudinal course, associations with psychosocial and perinatal risk, and prediction of postnatal mood disturbance. METHODS: 345 women oversampled for prenatal anxiety and depression were selected from an urban obstetrics clinic serving a predominantly low-income, ethnically diverse population. PrA was assessed at 20 and 32 weeks gestation; anxiety and depression symptoms were assessed from questionnaire and from clinical interview at 20 and 32 weeks gestation and again at 2 and 6 months postnatally. Data relevant to psychosocial and obstetric risks were ascertained from interview, medical exam, and chart review. RESULTS: Two distinct factors of PrA were identified, indexing specific concerns about the child's health and about the birth; these two PrA factors showed distinct longitudinal patterns in the prenatal period, and modest associations with general measures of anxiety and depression from questionnaire and clinical interview. PrA was also distinguished from conventional symptom measures in its associated features and prediction of birth weight and postnatal mood. LIMITATIONS: The sample was at high psychosocial risk and ethnically diverse; findings may not generalize to other samples. CONCLUSIONS: PrA can be distinguished from general measures of anxiety in pregnancy in terms of longitudinal course, associated features, and prediction to postnatal mood disturbance, and may warrant specific clinical attention.
BACKGROUND: Pregnancy-related anxiety (PrA) has attracted considerable research attention, but questions remain about its distinctiveness from conventional constructs and measures. In a high psychosocial risk, ethnically diverse sample, we examine the degree to which PrA is distinct from continuous and diagnostic measures of anxiety and worry in terms of longitudinal course, associations with psychosocial and perinatal risk, and prediction of postnatal mood disturbance. METHODS: 345 women oversampled for prenatal anxiety and depression were selected from an urban obstetrics clinic serving a predominantly low-income, ethnically diverse population. PrA was assessed at 20 and 32 weeks gestation; anxiety and depression symptoms were assessed from questionnaire and from clinical interview at 20 and 32 weeks gestation and again at 2 and 6 months postnatally. Data relevant to psychosocial and obstetric risks were ascertained from interview, medical exam, and chart review. RESULTS: Two distinct factors of PrA were identified, indexing specific concerns about the child's health and about the birth; these two PrA factors showed distinct longitudinal patterns in the prenatal period, and modest associations with general measures of anxiety and depression from questionnaire and clinical interview. PrA was also distinguished from conventional symptom measures in its associated features and prediction of birth weight and postnatal mood. LIMITATIONS: The sample was at high psychosocial risk and ethnically diverse; findings may not generalize to other samples. CONCLUSIONS: PrA can be distinguished from general measures of anxiety in pregnancy in terms of longitudinal course, associated features, and prediction to postnatal mood disturbance, and may warrant specific clinical attention.
Authors: Marci Lobel; Dolores Lacey Cannella; Jennifer E Graham; Carla DeVincent; Jayne Schneider; Bruce A Meyer Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Michael S Kramer; John Lydon; Louise Séguin; Lise Goulet; Susan R Kahn; Helen McNamara; Jacques Genest; Clément Dassa; Moy Fong Chen; Shakti Sharma; Michael J Meaney; Steven Thomson; Stan Van Uum; Gideon Koren; Mourad Dahhou; Julie Lamoureux; Robert W Platt Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-04-10 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Sonja Entringer; Claudia Buss; James M Swanson; Dan M Cooper; Deborah A Wing; Feizal Waffarn; Pathik D Wadhwa Journal: J Nutr Metab Date: 2012-05-10
Authors: Emily J Fawcett; Nichole Fairbrother; Megan L Cox; Ian R White; Jonathan M Fawcett Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2019-07-23 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Laura A McGuinn; Marcela Tamayo-Ortiz; Maria José Rosa; Homero Harari; Erika Osorio-Valencia; Lourdes Schnaas; Carmen Hernandez-Chavez; Rosalind J Wright; Daniel N Klein; Martha Maria Téllez-Rojo; Robert O Wright Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 4.905