Literature DB >> 26999412

Dynamic Single-Leg Postural Control Is Impaired Bilaterally Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Implications for Reinjury Risk.

Adam G Culvenor, Bryce C Alexander, Ross A Clark, Natalie J Collins, Eva Ageberg, Hayden G Morris, Timothy S Whitehead, Kay M Crossley.   

Abstract

Study Design Cross-sectional, controlled laboratory study. Background Postural control following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) primarily has been investigated during static single-leg balance tasks. Little is known about dynamic postural control deficits post-ACLR. Objectives To compare dynamic postural control (bilaterally) in individuals who have undergone ACLR and in healthy controls, and to evaluate the relationship between dynamic postural control and self-reported and objective function. Methods Ninety-seven participants (66 male; median age, 28 years) 12 months post-ACLR and 48 healthy controls (20 male; median age, 30 years) underwent balance assessment using a Nintendo Wii Balance Board during a single-leg squat. Center-of-pressure (CoP) path velocity, as well as CoP amplitude and standard deviation, in both mediolateral (ML) and anteroposterior (AP) directions were recorded. Self-reported function was assessed with the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form (IKDC), while hop for distance was used to evaluate functional status. Results Compared to healthy controls, the ACLR group had greater mean CoP path velocity (16% higher, P = .004), ML range (23%, P<.001), ML SD (28%, P<.001), AP range (14%, P = .009), and AP SD (15%, P = .013), indicating worse dynamic balance post-ACLR. Dynamic balance performance was similar between the ACLR limb and the uninjured contralateral limb. The AP SD was weakly associated with hop performance (β = -.2, P = .046); no balance measures were associated with IKDC score. Conclusion Individuals who have undergone ACLR demonstrate impaired dynamic balance bilaterally when performing a single-leg squat, which may have implications for physical function and future injury risk. Routine dynamic balance assessment may help identify patients who could benefit from targeted neuromuscular training programs to improve objective function and potentially lower reinjury risk. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016;46(5):357-364. Epub 21 Mar 2016. doi:10.2519/jospt.2016.6305.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Wii Balance Board; balance; knee; lower extremity function; single-leg squat

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26999412     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  12 in total

1.  Measures of Agility and Single-Legged Balance as Clinical Assessments in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Healthy Individuals.

Authors:  Aleah N Kirsch; Stephan G Bodkin; Susan A Saliba; Joseph M Hart
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Optimization of the Return-to-Sport Paradigm After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Critical Step Back to Move Forward.

Authors:  Bart Dingenen; Alli Gokeler
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Low percentage of patients passed the 'Back in Action' test battery 9 months after bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Annick E Ronden; Baris B Koc; Lize van Rooij; Martijn G M Schotanus; Edwin J P Jansen
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-09-11

4.  Postural control during single leg stance in individuals with clinical indication for combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate and the anterolateral ligaments of the knee: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Marilia Novaes; Adriana Carvalho; Juliana F Sauer; Guilherme C Brech; Camilo P Helito; Silvia M A João
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 2.562

5.  Clinical Decision Algorithm Associated With Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Thamlya Rocha Albano; Carlos Augusto Silva Rodrigues; Antonio Kayro Pereira Melo; Pedro Olavo de Paula; Gabriel Peixoto Leão Almeida
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  ACL injury and reconstruction affect control of ground reaction forces produced during a novel task that simulates cutting movements.

Authors:  Amelia S Lanier; Brian A Knarr; Nicholas Stergiou; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Thomas S Buchanan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Criteria for Return to Sport after Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction with lower reinjury risk (CR'STAL study): protocol for a prospective observational study in France.

Authors:  Alexandre J M Rambaud; Bertrand Semay; Pierre Samozino; Jean-Benoît Morin; Rodolphe Testa; Rémi Philippot; Jérémy Rossi; Pascal Edouard
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Exercise-therapy and education for individuals one year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Brooke E Patterson; Christian J Barton; Adam G Culvenor; Randall L Cooper; Kay M Crossley
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  One-leg rise performance and associated knee kinematics in ACL-deficient and ACL-reconstructed persons 23 years post-injury.

Authors:  Andrew Strong; Eva Tengman; Divya Srinivasan; Charlotte K Häger
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Innovative rehabilitative bracing with applied resistance improves walking pattern recovery in the early stages of rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Jacopo Emanuele Rocchi; Luciana Labanca; Valeria Luongo; Lorenzo Rum
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.