| Literature DB >> 26999175 |
Junhui Hao1, Jiana Wang2, Li Liu3, Wei Wu4, Hui Wu5.
Abstract
As a common mental disorder, depressive symptoms had been studied extensively all over the world. However, positive resources for combating depressive symptoms among Chinese doctors were rarely studied. Our study aimed to investigate the relationships between work-family conflict (WFC) and family-work conflict (FWC) with depressive symptoms among Chinese doctors. Meanwhile, the role of perceived organizational support (POS) in this association was explored at an organizational level. The investigation was conducted between March and April 2014. Questionnaires that measured WFC, FWC, depressive symptoms and POS were distributed to 1200 doctors in Shenyang, China. The final study subjects were 931 doctors (effective response rate: 77.6%). In all analyses, male and female doctors were analyzed separately because of possible gender differences. Hierarchical linear regression analyses were used to examine the moderating role of POS. Baron and Kenny's technique and asymptotic and resampling strategies were used to explore the mediating role of POS on the associations of WFC or FWC with depressive symptoms. WFC and FWC had positive relations with depressive symptoms among doctors. POS played a partial mediating role on the correlation of FWC with depressive symptoms among male doctors, and POS played a partial mediating role on the correlation of WFC with depressive symptoms among female doctors. POS had a positive moderating effect on the relationship between WFC and depressive symptoms among doctors. WFC and FWC could aggravate doctors' depressive symptoms, and POS, as an organizational resource, could fight against doctors' depressive symptoms. When POS functioned as a mediator, FWC had a negative effect on POS, which could increase male doctors' depressive symptoms, and WFC had a negative effect on POS, which could increase female doctors' depressive symptoms. In the meantime, POS, as a moderator, could enhance the effects of WFC on depressive symptoms.Entities:
Keywords: depressive symptoms; doctors; family-work conflict; perceived organizational support; work-family conflict
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26999175 PMCID: PMC4808989 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13030326
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Theoretical model of the mediating effect of POS on the associations of WFC, FWC and depressive symptoms. (a) the associations of WFC, FWC and POS; (b) the correlation of POS with depressive symptoms after controlling for the predictor variable; (c) the correlations among WFC, FWC with depressive symptoms; (c’) the correlations among WFC, FWC and depressive symptoms after adding POS.
Demographic characteristics and distributions of doctors.
| Variable | Males(423) N (%) | Females(508) N (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | <0.01 | ||
| ≤30 | 104 (24.6%) | 191 (37.6%) | |
| 30–40 | 170 (40.2%) | 161 (31.7%) | |
| ≥40 | 149 (35.2%) | 156 (30.7%) | |
| Marital status | <0.01 | ||
| Single/widowed/divorced | 85 (20.1%) | 154 (30.3%) | |
| Married/cohabiting | 338 (79.9%) | 354 (69.7%) | |
| Education | 0.316 | ||
| Junior college or lower | 45 (10.6%) | 55 (10.8%) | |
| College | 256 (60.5%) | 284 (55.9%) | |
| Graduate or higher | 122 (28.8%) | 169 (33.3%) | |
| Having children | <0.01 | ||
| Yes | 79 (18.7%) | 144 (28.3%) | |
| No | 344 (81.3%) | 364 (71.7%) | |
| Weekly work time | 0.111 | ||
| ≤40 | 113 (26.7%) | 160 (31.5%) | |
| >40 | 310 (73.3%) | 348 (68.5%) |
Demographic characteristics and distributions of depressive symptoms.
| Variable | Males | Females | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | Depressive Symptoms | N (%) | Depressive Symptoms | |
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |||
| Total | 423 (45.4%) | 19.54 (10.34) | 508 (54.6%) | 19.39 (10.22) |
| Age (years) | ||||
| ≤30 | 104 (24.6%) | 18.70 (11.02) | 191 (37.6%) | 18.94 (10.41) |
| 30–40 | 170 (40.2%) | 20.20 (10.47) | 161 (31.7%) | 20.42 (10.46) |
| ≥40 | 149 (35.2%) | 19.38 (9.70) | 156 (30.7%) | 18.89 (9.71) |
| Marital status | ||||
| Single/widowed/divorced | 85 (20.1%) | 19.74 (11.88) | 154 (30.3%) | 19.20 (9.56) |
| Married/cohabiting | 338 (79.9%) | 19.49 (9.93) | 354 (69.7%) | 19.48 (10.501) |
| Education | ||||
| Junior college or lower | 45 (10.6%) | 19.40 (10.59) | 55 (10.8%) | 19.63 (10.85) |
| College | 256 (60.5%) | 20.09 (10.61) | 284 (55.9%) | 19.51 (9.38) |
| Graduate or higher | 122 (28.8%) | 18.43 (9.63) | 169 (33.3%) | 19.13 (11.35) |
| Having Children | ||||
| Yes | 79 (18.7%) | 19.50 (11.55) | 144 (28.3%) | 19.16 (9.66) |
| No | 344 (81.3%) | 19.55 (10.06) | 364 (71.7%) | 19.49 (10.44) |
| Weekly work time | ||||
| ≤40 | 113 (26.7%) | 19.28 (10.62) | 160 (31.5%) | 19.28 (10.03) |
| >40 | 310 (73.3%) | 19.63 (10.25) | 348 (68.5%) | 19.44 (10.32) |
SD: standard deviations.
Correlations of continues variables for doctors.
| Variables | Males | Females | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 1. Age (years) | - | −0.043 | 0.003 | −0. 022 | 0.040 | −0.14 ** |
| 2. Depressive symptoms | −0.001 | - | 0. 324 ** | 0.494 ** | −0.291 ** | −0.019 |
| 3. WFC | 0.018 | 0.238 ** | - | 0.441 ** | −0.173 ** | 0.202 ** |
| 4. FWC | −0.036 | 0.463 ** | 0.541 ** | - | −0.090 * | 0.016 |
| 5. POS | 0.057 | −0.390 ** | −0.077 | −0.185 ** | - | 0.046 |
| 6. Weekly work time | −0.172 ** | −0.018 | 0.153 ** | −0.051 | −0.028 | - |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 (two-tailed). Results for male doctors are below the diagonal and for female doctors are above the diagonal.
The interaction of WFC/FWC and gender for doctors.
| Variable | Depressive Symptoms | Variable | Depressive Symptoms | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| step1 (β) | step2 (β) | step1 (β) | step2 (β) | ||||||
| Age (years) | −0.048 | 0.219 | −0.046 | 0.230 | Age (years) | −0.035 | 0.323 | −0.036 | 0.316 |
| Weekly work time | −0.078 * | 0.017 | −0.080 * | 0.014 | Weekly work time | −0.015 | 0.610 | −0.016 | 0.595 |
| Marital status | −0.044 | 0.679 | −0.039 | 0.714 | Marital status | −0.120 | 0.219 | −0.123 | 0.207 |
| Having children | 0.056 | 0.609 | 0.049 | 0.653 | Having children | 0.151 | 0.131 | 0.155 | 0.123 |
| Gender | −0.021 | 0.504 | −0.273 | 0.048 | Gender | 0.013 | 0.657 | −0.049 | 0.625 |
| WFC | 0.295 ** | 0.000 | 0.119 | 0.228 | FWC | 0.481 ** | 0.000 | 0.423 ** | 0.000 |
| WFC × Gender | - | - | 0.317 | 0.060 | FWC × Gender | - | - | 0.085 | 0.518 |
| R2 | 0.086 | - | 0.090 | - | R2 | 0.223 | - | 0.223 | - |
| ΔR2 | 0.086 ** | - | 0.090 | - | ΔR2 | 0.223 ** | - | 0.000 | - |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 (two-tailed).
The regression analysis for the interaction of WFC, FWC and POS among male doctors.
| Variable | Depressive Symptoms | Variable | Depressive Symptoms | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| step1 (β) | step2 (β) | step3 (β) | step1 (β) | step2 (β) | step3 (β) | ||
| Age (years) | −0.009 | 0.013 | 0.01 | Age (years) | −0.009 | 0.04 | 0.039 |
| Weekly work time | −0.019 | −0.058 | −0.058 | Weekly work time | −0.019 | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Marital status | −0.135 | −0.176 | −0.175 | Marital status | −0.135 | −0.132 | −0.129 |
| Having children | 0.136 | 0.153 | 0.15 | Having children | 0.136 | 0.108 | 0.103 |
| WFC | - | 0.219 ** | 0.242 ** | FWC | - | 0.405 ** | 0.412 ** |
| POS | - | −0.377 ** | −0.370 ** | POS | - | −0.319 ** | −0.308 ** |
| WFC×POS | - | - | 0.094 * | FWC×POS | - | - | 0.064 |
| R2 | 0.002 | 0.202 | 0.21 | R2 | 0.002 | 0.313 | 0.317 |
| ΔR2 | 0.002 | 0.200 ** | 0.008 * | ΔR2 | 0.002 | 0.311 ** | 0.004 |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 (two-tailed).
The regression analysis for the interaction of WFC, FWC and POS among female doctors.
| Variable | Depressive Symptoms | Variable | Depressive Symptoms | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| step1 (β) | step2 (β) | step3 (β) | step1 (β) | step2 (β) | step3 (β) | ||
| Age (years) | −0.085 | −0.043 | −0.039 | Age (years) | −0.085 | −0.053 | −0.051 |
| Weekly work time | −0.027 | −0.075 | −0.067 | Weekly work time | −0.027 | −0.017 | −0.017 |
| Marital status | −0.025 | 0.008 | 0.011 | Marital status | −0.025 | −0.157 | −0.160 |
| Having children | 0.088 | −0.010 | −0.014 | Having children | 0.088 | 0.193 | 0.193 |
| WFC | - | 0.299 ** | 0.291 ** | FWC | - | 0.476 ** | 0.473 ** |
| POS | - | −0.235 ** | −0.232 ** | POS | - | −0.244 ** | −0.238 ** |
| WFC × POS | - | - | 0.114 ** | FWC × POS | - | - | 0.027 |
| R2 | 0.005 | 0.168 | 0.181 | R2 | 0.005 | 0.310 | 0.311 |
| ΔR2 | 0.005 | 0.163 ** | 0.013 ** | ΔR2 | 0.005 | 0.305 ** | 0.001 |
** p < 0.01 (two-tailed).
Hierarchical linear regression analysis results for WFC, POS and depressive symptoms among female doctors.
| Variable | Depressive Symptoms | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| step1( | step2( | step3( | |
| Age | −0.085 | −0.071 | −0.043 |
| Weekly work time | −0.027 | −0.097 * | −0.075 |
| Marital status | −0.025 | 0.029 | 0.008 |
| Having children | 0.088 | −0.004 | −0.010 |
| WFC | - | 0.342 ** | 0.299 ** |
| POS | - | - | −0.235 ** |
| R2 | 0.005 | 0.116 | 0.168 |
| ΔR2 | 0.005 | 0.111 ** | 0.052 ** |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 (two-tailed).
Regression analysis results, with WFC as the independent variable, and POS as a mediator.
| Predictors | Path Coefficients | a × b (BCa 95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| c | a | b | c’ | ||
| Females | - | - | - | - | - |
| POS | 0.324 ** | ‒0.173 ** | ‒0.241** | 0.283 ** | 0.042 (0.017, 0.074) |
** p < 0.01 (two-tailed).
Hierarchical linear regression analysis results for FWC, POS and depressive symptoms.
| Variable | Depressive Symptoms | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Males | Females | |||||
| step1(β) | step2(β) | step3(β) | step1(β) | step2(β) | step3(β) | |
| Age | −0.009 | 0.020 | 0.040 | −0.085 | −0.084 | −0.053 |
| Weekly work time | −0.019 | 0.010 | 0.003 | −0.027 | −0.032 | −0.017 |
| Marital status | −0.135 | −0.093 | −0.132 | −0.025 | −0.147 | −0.157 |
| Having children | 0.136 | 0.082 | 0.108 | 0.088 | 0.217 | 0.193 |
| FWC | - | 0.464 ** | 0.405 ** | - | 0.498 ** | 0.476 ** |
| POS | - | - | −0.319 ** | - | - | −0.244 ** |
| R2 | 0.002 | 0.216 | 0.313 | 0.005 | 0.252 | 0.302 |
| ΔR2 | 0.002 | 0.214 ** | 0.097 ** | 0.005 | 0.247 ** | 0.058 ** |
** p < 0.01 (two-tailed).
Regression analysis results, with FWC as the independent variable, and POS as a mediator.
| Predictors | Path Coefficients | a × b (BCa 95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| c | a | b | c’ | ||
| Males | - | - | - | - | - |
| POS | 0.464 ** | ‒0.183 ** | ‒0.317 ** | 0.406 ** | 0.058 (0.025, 0.101) |
| Females | - | - | - | - | - |
| POS | 0.494 ** | ‒0.089 * | ‒0.248 ** | 0.472 ** | 0.022 (‒0.002, 0.052) |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 (two-tailed).