| Literature DB >> 26999050 |
Mariola M Marcinkiewicz1,2,3, Sandy T Baker1,2,3, Jichuan Wu1,2,3, Terrence L Hubert1,2,3, Marla R Wolfson1,4,2,3.
Abstract
The in vivo ovine model provides a clinically relevant platform to study cardiopulmonary mechanisms and treatments of disease; however, a robust ovine primary alveolar epithelial type II (ATII) cell culture model is lacking. The objective of this study was to develop and optimize ovine lung tissue cryopreservation and primary ATII cell culture methodologies for the purposes of dissecting mechanisms at the cellular level to elucidate responses observed in vivo. To address this, we established in vitro submerged and air-liquid interface cultures of primary ovine ATII cells isolated from fresh or cryopreserved lung tissues obtained from mechanically ventilated sheep (128 days gestation-6 months of age). Presence, abundance, and mRNA expression of surfactant proteins was assessed by immunocytochemistry, Western Blot, and quantitative PCR respectively on the day of isolation, and throughout the 7 day cell culture study period. All biomarkers were significantly greater from cells isolated from fresh than cryopreserved tissue, and those cultured in air-liquid interface as compared to submerged culture conditions at all time points. Surfactant protein expression remained in the air-liquid interface culture system while that of cells cultured in the submerged system dissipated over time. Despite differences in biomarker magnitude between cells isolated from fresh and cryopreserved tissue, cells isolated from cryopreserved tissue remained metabolically active and demonstrated a similar response as cells from fresh tissue through 72 hr period of hyperoxia. These data demonstrate a cell culture methodology using fresh or cryopreserved tissue to support study of ovine primary ATII cell function and responses, to support expanded use of biobanked tissues, and to further understanding of mechanisms that contribute to in vivo function of the lung.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26999050 PMCID: PMC4801353 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1ATII cell identification.
Freshly isolated cells were stained according to modified Papanicolau protocol. Type II cells are identified by the presence of dark purple inclusions (arrows) representing lamellar bodies. Purity of ATII cell preparations as assessed using this method was comparable for fresh (85.4 ± 2.2% SD; n = 10 isolations; shown in figure) as compared to cryopreserved tissue (85.1 ± 1% SD; n = 10 isolations); bar = 10μm.
Fig 2Surfactant protein B (SP-B) expression of ATII cells in culture.
A) SP-B protein production was analyzed by Western Blot; B) SP-B protein bands were quantitated by densitometry and expressed as a % of that produced on the day of isolation (d0). Open bars: fresh tissue; hatched bars: cryopreserved tissue; S: submerged culture; A: air-liquid interface culture. ** p < 0.01 fresh vs cryopreserved; Ṫ p < 0.05; ṪṪ p < 0.01 submerged vs air-liquid interface culture systems; mean ± SEM; n = 4/group.
Fig 3Visualization of (A) Surfactant protein A (SP-A) and (B) SP-C expression by ATII cells cultured for 6 days. Cells isolated from cryopreserved tissue and cultured in the air-liquid interface system, were fixed and labeled with primary anti SP-A or SP-C antibody and secondary FITC conjugated antibody, and visualized by fluorescence microscopy; bars = 10μm.
Fig 4Comparison of the production of SP-B during hyperoxia vs normoxia exposure of air-liquid culture system of ATII cells.
Derived from (A) fresh and (B) cryopreserved tissue show time-dependent differences in the amount of SP-B protein as shown by Western Blot and (C) when normalized to GAPDH by densitometry and in (D) SP-B mRNA expression (absolute quantification of SP-B gene relative to 18S as described in methods). N: normoxia; H: hyperoxia; open bars: fresh tissue; hatched bars: cryopreserved tissue; mean ± SEM; n = 4 / group. ** p < 0.01 fresh vs cryopreserved; ṪṪ p < 0.01 normoxic vs hyperoxic 72 h; ‡ p < 0.01 vs 24 h of matched tissue origin (fresh, cryopreserved) and oxygen (normoxia, hyperoxia) condition. bar = 10μm.
Fig 5Surfactant proteins A, B, C, and D mRNA expression during ATII cell culture (absolute quantification of SP gene relative to 18S as described in methods). d0: day of isolation; S: submerged culture; A: air-liquid interface culture; open bars: fresh tissue (n = 6/group); hatched bars: cryopreserved tissue (n = 8/group); mean ± SEM; * p< 0.05 and ** p < 0.01: fresh vs cryopreserved; Ṫ p < 0.05 and Ṫ Ṫ p < 0.01: submerged vs air-liquid interface culture systems.