Literature DB >> 26998464

FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE AND KNEE LAXITY IN NORMAL INDIVIDUALS AND IN INDIVIDUALS SUBMITTED TO ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION.

Rodrigo Antunes de Vasconcelos1, Débora Bevilaqua-Grossi2, Antonio Carlos Shimano2, Cleber Antonio Jansen Paccola2, Tânia Fátima Salvini3, Christiane Lanatovits Prado3, Wilson A Mello Junior4.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation between deficits in the isokinetic peak torque of the knee extensors and flexors with hop tests, postoperative knee laxity and functional scores in normal and ACL- reconstructed subjects with patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts.
METHODS: Sixty male subjects were enrolled and subdivided into three groups: Twenty subjects without knee injuries (GC group) and two groups of 20 subjects submitted to ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon (GTP group) and hamstrings autograft (GTF group).
RESULTS: The results showed significant correlation between knee extensors peak torque and performance in the hop tests for GTF and GC groups. There are no significantly correlations between post op knee laxity and Lysholm score compared with the hop tests and peak torque deficits. Concerning the differences between groups, the GTP group showed greater peak torque deficits in knee extensors, worst Lysholm scores and higher percentage of individuals with lower limb symmetry index (ISM) < 90% in both hop tests when compared to the other two groups.
CONCLUSION: It is not recommendable to use only one measurement instrument for the functional evaluation of ACL-reconstructed patients, because significant correlation between peak torque, subject's functional score, knee laxity and hop tests were not observed in all groups.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament; Knee; Retrospective study

Year:  2015        PMID: 26998464      PMCID: PMC4783593          DOI: 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30060-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop        ISSN: 2255-4971


  34 in total

1.  A five-year comparison of patellar tendon versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Leo A Pinczewski; David J Deehan; Lucy J Salmon; Vivianne J Russell; Amanda Clingeleffer
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 2.  Hop tests as predictors of dynamic knee stability.

Authors:  G K Fitzgerald; S M Lephart; J H Hwang; R S Wainner
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.751

3.  Comparing 2-year outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using either patella-tendon or semitendinosus-tendon autografts: a non-randomised prospective study.

Authors:  B P B Tow; P C C Chang; A K Mitra; B K Tay; M C Wong
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.118

4.  Arthroscopy-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon substitution. Two- to four-year follow-up results.

Authors:  B R Bach; G T Jones; F A Sweet; C A Hager
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  There are differences in early morbidity after ACL reconstruction when comparing patellar tendon and semitendinosus tendon graft. A prospective randomized study of 107 patients.

Authors:  K Eriksson; P Anderberg; P Hamberg; P Olerud; T Wredmark
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.221

7.  Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and four-strand hamstring tendon autograft.

Authors:  I S Corry; J M Webb; A J Clingeleffer; L A Pinczewski
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  A cross-sectional analysis of sagittal knee laxity and isokinetic muscle strength in soccer players.

Authors:  M Ergün; C Işlegen; E Taşkiran
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.118

Review 9.  Mechanisms of noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Yohei Shimokochi; Sandra J Shultz
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  The long-term followup of primary anterior cruciate ligament repair. Defining a rationale for augmentation.

Authors:  M F Sherman; L Lieber; J R Bonamo; L Podesta; I Reiter
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.