| Literature DB >> 26998365 |
Chuan-Chih Yang1, Alfonso Barrós-Loscertales2, Daniel Pinazo3, Noelia Ventura-Campos4, Viola Borchardt5, Juan-Carlos Bustamante6, Aina Rodríguez-Pujadas2, Paola Fuentes-Claramonte2, Raúl Balaguer3, César Ávila2, Martin Walter7.
Abstract
The topic of investigating how mindfulness meditation training can have antidepressant effects via plastic changes in both resting state and meditation state brain activity is important in the rapidly emerging field of neuroplasticity. In the present study, we used a longitudinal design investigating resting state fMRI both before and after 40 days of meditation training in 13 novices. After training, we compared differences in network connectivity between rest and meditation using common resting state functional connectivity methods. Interregional methods were paired with local measures such as Regional Homogeneity. As expected, significant differences in functional connectivity both between states (rest versus meditation) and between time points (before versus after training) were observed. During meditation, the internal consistency in the precuneus and the temporoparietal junction increased, while the internal consistency of frontal brain regions decreased. A follow-up analysis of regional connectivity of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex further revealed reduced connectivity with anterior insula during meditation. After meditation training, reduced resting state functional connectivity between the pregenual anterior cingulate and dorsal medical prefrontal cortex was observed. Most importantly, significantly reduced depression/anxiety scores were observed after training. Hence, these findings suggest that mindfulness meditation might be of therapeutic use by inducing plasticity related network changes altering the neuronal basis of affective disorders such as depression.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26998365 PMCID: PMC4779536 DOI: 10.1155/2016/9504642
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neural Plast ISSN: 1687-5443 Impact factor: 3.599
Characteristics of the subject sample. Wherever relevant, group mean (± standard deviation) is given.
| Number of participants | 13 |
| Ratio of males and females | 3/10 |
| Age | 24.53 (±5.89) |
| Ratio of handedness | right = 13, left = 0 |
|
| |
| Minutes of meditation practice per day | 10.67 (±1.66) |
| Total number of meditation days until scanning | 39.23 (±3.63) |
| Total number of minutes of meditation practice until scanning | 418.07 (±71.45) |
Figure 1Seed ROIs used for RSFC analysis. ROI1: pregenual ACC (pgACC) as marked in red color. ROI2: dorsal ACC (dACC) as marked in blue color overlaid on the T1 anatomical MNI space.
Profile of Mood States (POMS), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores before and after meditation training. Group means and standard deviations are listed. Significant group differences are listed as follows: ∗∗∗: significant at p < 0.001, ∗∗: significant at p < 0.01, and ∗: significant at p < 0.05. ※: before training, 6 out of 13 subjects surpassed the cutoff for depression. (+): positive mood state factor, (−): negative mood state factor.
| Questionnaire | Before training | After training |
|---|---|---|
| POMS | ||
| Anger (−) | 2.84 (±3.78) | 3.30 (±6.07) |
| Fatigue (−) | 4.84 (±2.67) | 3.69 (±4.57) |
| Vigor (+) | 11.92 (±5.31) | 12.30 (±5.36) |
| Friendliness (+) | 18.92 (±2.98) | 19.46 (±4.27) |
| Tension (−) | 8.00 (±3.36) | 5.38 (±5.18) |
| Depression (−) | 3.76 (±3.94) | 4.53 (±8.04) |
|
| ||
| CES-D | 16.23 (±9.54) | 9 (±6.20) |
|
| ||
| STAI, state | 17.84 (±4.75) | 14.38 (±10.16) |
| STAI, trait | 21.30 (±8.6) | 16.84 (±9.56) |
Figure 2(a) Paired comparison of seed-based FC maps (seed = pgACC) between rest and meditation at TP2 (p < 0.05, FWE-corrected). Bar plot represents the t-values. White labels indicate the coordinate of each slice in the MNI frame of reference (x, z). (b) Paired comparison of seed-based FC maps (seed = dACC) between rest and meditation at TP2. FC decreases between dorsal ACC and left AI during meditation as compared to rest (p < 0.05, FWE-corrected). Bar plot represents the t-values. White labels indicate the coordinate of each slice in the MNI frame of reference (x, z).
Regions showing functional differences between conditions (rest versus meditation).
| Analysis | Rest > meditation | Meditation > rest | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region | Side |
| MNI coordinates |
| Region | Side |
| MNI coordinates |
| |
| ICA | ( | |||||||||
| dACC | R | 202 | 9 21 36 | 5.70 | Precuneus | R | 178 | 3 −66 27 | 4.94 | |
| sgACC | R | 349 | 9 27 0 | 5.60 | TPJ/IPL | L | 157 | −51 −57 27 | 4.31 | |
| AI | L | 336 | −39 9 0 | 5.02 | ||||||
| AI | R | 37 | 45 18 0 | 4.34 | ||||||
| IFG/BA9 | R | 21 | 60 18 27 | 4.26 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| Seed-based FC | ( | |||||||||
| (ROI: pgACC) | IPL | L | 42 | −45 −39 36 | 4.31 | TPJ | R | 58 | 57 −66 36 | 4.51 |
| IPL | R | 45 | 39 −51 51 | 4.17 | MPFC | R | 36 | 9 51 9 | 4.49 | |
| STG | L | 23 | −42 −60 18 | 3.86 | ||||||
| (ROI: dACC) | AI | L | 20 | −36 18 3 | 4.2 | n.s. | ||||
|
| ||||||||||
| ReHo | ( | |||||||||
| n.s. | dACC | R | 125 | 0 36 15 | 5.32 | |||||
| MPFC | R | 125 | 6 48 12 | 4.24 | ||||||
| Putamen | L | 77 | −21 6 3 | 4.40 | ||||||
Notes: AI, anterior insula; dACC, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex; IPL, inferior parietal lobe; K, cluster size; MPFC, medial prefrontal cortex; pgACC, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex; sgACC, subgenual anterior cingulate cortex; STG, superior temporal gyrus; TPJ, temporoparietal junction; and BA: brodmann area.
aFamily-wise error.
bA combined threshold of p < 0.001 and a minimum cluster size determined by AlphaSimc algorithm in AFNI, resulting in FWE-corrected threshold of p < 0.05. An estimate of the spatial correlation across voxels was modeled using the program 3dFWHMd in AFNI.
cAlphaSim: http://afni.nimh.nih.gov/pub/dist/doc/manual/AlphaSim.pdf.
d3dFWHM: http://afni.nimh.nih.gov/pub/dist/doc/program_help/3dFWHM.html.
Figure 3(a) Longitudinal seed-based RSFC results (seed = pgACC) (p < 0.05, FWE-corrected). Bar plot represents the t-values. White labels indicate the coordinate of each slice in the MNI frame of reference (x, z). (b) Longitudinal seed-based RSFC results (seed = dACC) (p < 0.05, FWE-corrected). Bar plot represents the t-values. White labels indicate the coordinate of each slice in the MNI frame of reference (x, z).
Regions showing RSFC differences between time points.
| Analysis | TP1 > TP2 | TP2 > TP1 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region | Side |
| MNI coordinates |
| Region | Side |
| MNI coordinates |
| |
| ICA | n.s. ( | |||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| Seed-based FC | ( | |||||||||
| (ROI: pgACC) | PCC/precuneus | L | 58 | −12 −51 15 | 4.71 | ITG | R | 16 | 54 −63 −18 | 4.23 |
| dmPFC | L | 49 | −12 45 54 | 4.35 | IFG | R | 17 | 39 24 6 | 3.84 | |
| STG | R | 53 | 54 −63 15 | 4.34 | IPL/TPJ | R | 18 | 33 −60 42 | 3.76 | |
| MOG | L | 22 | −24 −102 6 | 4.19 | ||||||
| ITG | L | 21 | −57 0 −24 | 4.01 | ||||||
| (ROI: dACC) | Calcarine/cuneus | L | 18 | −9 −84 21 | 4.37 | Cerebellum | L | 22 | −30 −54 −30 | 4.56 |
| BA19 | L | 26 | −27 −90 21 | 4.01 | IPL | R | 16 | 36 −60 45 | 4.20 | |
| PCC | R | 19 |
| 4.13 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| ReHo | n.s. ( | |||||||||
Note: dmPFC, dorsal medial prefrontal cortex; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; IPL, inferior parietal lobe; ITG, inferior temporal gyrus; K, cluster size; PCC, post cingulate cortex; STG, superior temporal gyrus; MOG, middle occipital gyrus; and BA: brodmann area.
aFamily-wise error.
bA combined threshold of p < 0.001 and a minimum cluster size determined by AlphaSimc algorithm in AFNI, resulting in corrected threshold of p < 0.05. An estimate of the spatial correlation across voxels was modeled using the program 3dFWHMd in AFNI.
cAlphaSim: http://afni.nimh.nih.gov/pub/dist/doc/manual/AlphaSim.pdf.
d3dFWHM: http://afni.nimh.nih.gov/pub/dist/doc/program_help/3dFWHM.html.
Figure 4Mean power spectral density of the Default Mode Network (DMN) component. The peak power density was observed below 0.04 Hz for both conditions (resting state and meditation state). AU stands for arbitrary unit.
Figure 5ICA results. DMN differences at TP2 for RS > MS and MS > RS (p < 0.05, FWE-corrected). Bar plot represents the t-values. White labels indicate the coordinate of each slice in the MNI frame of reference (x, z).
Figure 6Regional homogeneity difference between MS and RS (p < 0.05, FWE-corrected). Bar plot represents the t-values. White labels indicate the coordinate of each slice in the MNI frame of reference (x, z).