| Literature DB >> 26998229 |
Stefan A Koestler1, Begum Alaybeyoglu2, Christian X Weichenberger3, Arzu Celik1,4.
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Understanding the regulatory mechanisms governing eye development of the model organism Drosophila melanogaster (D. m.) requires structured knowledge of the involved genes and proteins, their interactions, and dynamic expression patterns. Especially the latter information is however to a large extent scattered throughout the literature.Entities:
Keywords: Drosophila development; community annotation; database; gene regulatory network; ontology; protein interaction network; visualization; web-tool
Year: 2015 PMID: 26998229 PMCID: PMC4786896 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.7556.1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: F1000Res ISSN: 2046-1402
Figure 1. The FlyOde interface displaying the eye developmental network.
The red circle indicates the eyeless gene (see Example 1). The inset shows selected interactions containing network motifs: negative autoregulation and feedback loop (left) and an incoherent feed forward loop (right).
Figure 2. The FlyOde eye-ontology.
Hierarchical representation of controlled vocabulary for the gene annotation with dynamic expression patterns is shown. In the annotation syntax terms for cell type and developmental stage are directly linked. Each term-combination represents expression in a specific cell type and developmental stage. As many comma-separated term combinations as needed to describe the expression pattern are given. During retinal development of Drosophila, cells at consecutive stages of differentiation coexist at the same developmental stage of the organism. The morphogenetic furrow marks the initiation of differentiation and moves across the eye precursor organ, the eye imaginal disc. Thus, the expression pattern is also defined by the localization relative to the morphogenetic furrow. This and additional terms that are common in the field are assigned to what we call “differentiation level”.