Yuji Nagatomo1, Daniel Li1, Jennifer Kirsop1, Alan Borowski1, Akanksha Thakur1, W H Wilson Tang2. 1. Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH. 2. Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH. Electronic address: tangw@ccf.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the prevalence and role of β1 adrenergic receptor autoantibodies (β1AR-AAb) belonging to the immunoglobulin (Ig)G3 subclass in patients with heart failure (HF) treated with β-adrenergic blockers. BACKGROUND: Several cardiac AAbs have been reported to be present in sera from patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and other etiologies. Among AAbs, those recognizing β1AR-AAbs show agonist-like effects, have detrimental effects on cardiomyocytes, and may induce persistent myocardial damage. METHODS: We quantify total IgG and IgG3 subclass β1AR-AAb in subjects with chronic stable HF with long-term follow-up. RESULTS: In our study cohort of 121 subjects, non-IgG3-β1AR-AAb and IgG3-β1AR-AAb were found to be positive in 20 (17%) and 26 patients (21%), respectively. The positive rate of IgG3-β1AR-AAb was significantly higher for those with nonischemic compared with ischemic HF etiology (27% vs 8%, P = .01), but the positive rate for non-IgG3-β1AR-AAb was similar between the 2 groups (18% vs 16%, respectively, P = NS). There were no significant differences in clinical and echocardiographic measures among total β1AR-AAb negative, non-IgG3-β1AR-AAb positive, and IgG3-β1AR-AAb positive groups at baseline. During 2.2 ± 1.2 years of follow-up, we observed similar rates of the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, cardiac transplantation, or hospitalization resulting from HF between total IgG-β1AR-AAb negative and positive patients. However, the composite endpoint events were significantly more common in the patients without than in those with IgG3-β1AR-AAb (P = .048, log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: Presence of IgG3-β1AR-AAb, not total IgG, was associated with paradoxically more favorable outcomes in our cohort of patients with chronic systolic HF largely treated by β-blockers.
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the prevalence and role of β1 adrenergic receptor autoantibodies (β1AR-AAb) belonging to the immunoglobulin (Ig)G3 subclass in patients with heart failure (HF) treated with β-adrenergic blockers. BACKGROUND: Several cardiac AAbs have been reported to be present in sera from patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and other etiologies. Among AAbs, those recognizing β1AR-AAbs show agonist-like effects, have detrimental effects on cardiomyocytes, and may induce persistent myocardial damage. METHODS: We quantify total IgG and IgG3 subclass β1AR-AAb in subjects with chronic stable HF with long-term follow-up. RESULTS: In our study cohort of 121 subjects, non-IgG3-β1AR-AAb and IgG3-β1AR-AAb were found to be positive in 20 (17%) and 26 patients (21%), respectively. The positive rate of IgG3-β1AR-AAb was significantly higher for those with nonischemic compared with ischemic HF etiology (27% vs 8%, P = .01), but the positive rate for non-IgG3-β1AR-AAb was similar between the 2 groups (18% vs 16%, respectively, P = NS). There were no significant differences in clinical and echocardiographic measures among total β1AR-AAb negative, non-IgG3-β1AR-AAb positive, and IgG3-β1AR-AAb positive groups at baseline. During 2.2 ± 1.2 years of follow-up, we observed similar rates of the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, cardiac transplantation, or hospitalization resulting from HF between total IgG-β1AR-AAb negative and positive patients. However, the composite endpoint events were significantly more common in the patients without than in those with IgG3-β1AR-AAb (P = .048, log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: Presence of IgG3-β1AR-AAb, not total IgG, was associated with paradoxically more favorable outcomes in our cohort of patients with chronic systolic HF largely treated by β-blockers.
Authors: Alexander Staudt; Yvonne Staudt; Marcus Dörr; Marco Böhm; Fabian Knebel; Astrid Hummel; Lydia Wunderle; Malte Tiburcy; Klaus D Wernecke; Gert Baumann; Stephan B Felix Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-08-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Beatrice Bornholz; Stefanie Weidtkamp-Peters; Stephanie Schmitmeier; Claus A M Seidel; Lars R Herda; Stephan B Felix; Horst Lemoine; Jürgen Hescheler; Filomain Nguemo; Christoph Schäfer; Morten O Christensen; Christian Mielke; Fritz Boege Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2012-12-03 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Yuji Nagatomo; Dennis M McNamara; Jeffrey D Alexis; Leslie T Cooper; G William Dec; Daniel F Pauly; Richard Sheppard; Randall C Starling; W H Wilson Tang Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2017-02-28 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Maradumane L Mohan; Yuji Nagatomo; Prasenjit Prasad Saha; Sromona D Mukherjee; Timothy Engelman; Rommel Morales; Stanley L Hazen; W H Wilson Tang; Sathyamangla V Naga Prasad Journal: Mol Biol Cell Date: 2021-02-03 Impact factor: 4.138
Authors: Diana Ernst; Johan Westerbergh; Georgios Sogkas; Alexandra Jablonka; Gerrit Ahrenstorf; Reinhold Ernst Schmidt; Harald Heidecke; Lars Wallentin; Gabriela Riemekasten; Torsten Witte Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-10-10 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Franziska Seidel; Carmen Scheibenbogen; Harald Heidecke; Bernd Opgen-Rhein; Thomas Pickardt; Karin Klingel; Felix Berger; Daniel Messroghli; Stephan Schubert Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2022-04-28 Impact factor: 3.418