Literature DB >> 26997317

An evaluation of a body image intervention in adolescent girls delivered in single-sex versus co-educational classroom settings.

Candice J Dunstan1, Susan J Paxton2, Siân A McLean3.   

Abstract

Body dissatisfaction is now recognized as having considerable negative impact on social, psychological, and physical health, particularly in adolescent girls. Consequently, we have developed a six-session co-educational body image intervention (Happy Being Me Co-educational) designed to reduce body dissatisfaction and its risk factors in Grade 7 girls. In addition to evaluating the program's efficacy, we aimed to identify whether girls would benefit equally when it was delivered as a universal intervention to a whole class including both boys and girls (co-educational delivery), or delivered as a selective intervention to girls only (single-sex delivery). Participants were 200 Grade 7 girls from five schools in Melbourne, Australia. Schools were randomly allocated to receive the intervention in single-sex classes (n=74), co-educational classes (n=73), or participate as a no-intervention control (n=53). Girls completed self-report assessments of body dissatisfaction, psychological (internalization of the thin ideal, appearance comparison, and self-esteem) and peer environment (weight-related teasing and appearance conversations) risk factors for body dissatisfaction, and dietary restraint, at baseline, post-intervention, and at 6-month follow-up. Significant improvements in body dissatisfaction and psychological risk factors were observed in the intervention group at post-intervention and these were maintained at follow-up for psychological risk factors. Importantly, no significant differences between universal and selective delivery were observed, suggesting that the intervention is appropriate for dissemination in both modes.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent girls; Body image; Co-educational; Selective prevention; Single-sex; Universal prevention

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26997317     DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eat Behav        ISSN: 1471-0153


  10 in total

Review 1.  School-Based Interventions Improve Body Image and Media Literacy in Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Martina Kurz; Jenny Rosendahl; Johanna Rodeck; Julia Muehleck; Uwe Berger
Journal:  J Prev (2022)       Date:  2021-12-28

2.  Mediating Effects of Intimacy Between Body Talk and Girls' Body Dissatisfaction: The Forgotten Sibling Relationship.

Authors:  Emma L Johnson; Elizabeth H Blodgett Salafia
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2022-03-19

3.  Body talk in the digital age: A controlled evaluation of a classroom-based intervention to reduce appearance commentary and improve body image.

Authors:  Beth T Bell; Caitlin Taylor; Danielle L Paddock; Adam Bates; Samuel T Orange
Journal:  Health Psychol Open       Date:  2021-05-29

4.  Efficacy of a prevention program for eating disorders in schools: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Antje Gumz; Angelika Weigel; Anne Daubmann; Karl Wegscheider; Georg Romer; Bernd Löwe
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 3.630

5.  Obesity and eating disorders in integrative prevention programmes for adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ana Carolina Barco Leme; Debbe Thompson; Karin Louise Lenz Dunker; Theresa Nicklas; Sonia Tucunduva Philippi; Tabbetha Lopez; Lydi-Anne Vézina-Im; Tom Baranowski
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Girls-only vs. mixed-gender groups in the delivery of a universal wellness programme among adolescents: A cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Reut Agam-Bitton; Wiessam Abu Ahmad; Moria Golan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Emotional Eating in Adolescence: Effects of Emotion Regulation, Weight Status and Negative Body Image.

Authors:  Lenka H Shriver; Jessica M Dollar; Susan D Calkins; Susan P Keane; Lilly Shanahan; Laurie Wideman
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Outcomes of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of the SoMe Social Media Literacy Program for Improving Body Image-Related Outcomes in Adolescent Boys and Girls.

Authors:  Chloe S Gordon; Hannah K Jarman; Rachel F Rodgers; Siân A McLean; Amy Slater; Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz; Susan J Paxton
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  "Why don't I look like her?" How adolescent girls view social media and its connection to body image.

Authors:  Alana Papageorgiou; Colleen Fisher; Donna Cross
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 2.742

10.  The Effects of a Physical Activity, Nutrition, and Body Image Intervention on Girls in Intermediate Schools in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Abeer Ahmad Bahathig; Hazizi Abu Saad
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 4.614

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.