Literature DB >> 26997311

Characteristics of Anteriorly Located Prostate Cancer and the Usefulness of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Diagnosis.

Myong Kim1, Seung-Kwon Choi1, Myungchan Park1, Myungsun Shim1, Cheryn Song1, In Gab Jeong1, Jun Hyuk Hong1, Choung-Soo Kim1, Hanjong Ahn2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We analyzed the pathological and oncologic characteristics of anteriorly located prostate cancer and assessed the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging to detect anterior prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the records of 728 consecutive patients treated with radical prostatectomy. Patients were categorized with anterior or prostate cancer or tumors involving the anterior and posterior prostate according to the dominant tumor location on whole mount section.
RESULTS: The anterior and posterior prostate cancer groups and the group with cancer at both locations represented 31.0%, 46.7% and 22.3% of the total number of patients, respectively. Anterior prostate cancer was less commonly palpable (p <0.001) and needed more frequent repeat biopsy (p = 0.012) than posterior prostate cancer. Moreover, the anterior group had fewer positive cores than the posterior group (p <0.001) despite comparable tumor volumes. Gleason score upgrading was more frequently observed in anterior than in posterior prostate cancer (p = 0.003). However, final pathological features did not significantly differ. Only the seminal vesicle involvement rate was lower in anterior than in posterior prostate cancer (p <0.001). Estimated 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival in patients with anterior prostate cancer was 87.5%, significantly higher than in patients with posterior prostate cancer (77.4%, p = 0.001) and patients with anterior plus posterior involvement (74.4%, p <0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that anterior location was an independent prognostic factor for biochemical recurrence (HR 0.403) along with other well-known prognostic factors. To detect anterior prostate tumors the sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging were 78.1% and 58.2%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Anterior prostate cancer had pathological features and favorable oncologic outcomes comparable to those of posterior prostate cancer but also more frequent Gleason score upgrading. Magnetic resonance imaging had moderate diagnostic performance for detecting lesions in the anterior prostate.
Copyright © 2016 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diagnostic imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; neoplasm recurrence, local; prognosis; prostatic neoplasms

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26997311     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  10 in total

Review 1.  Prostate zones and cancer: lost in transition?

Authors:  Amin Ali; Alexander Du Feu; Pedro Oliveira; Ananya Choudhury; Robert G Bristow; Esther Baena
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Gleason grade accuracy of transperineal and transrectal prostate biopsies in MRI-naïve patients.

Authors:  Liang G Qu; Modher Al-Shawi; Tess Howard; Nathan Papa; Cedric Poyet; Brian Kelly; A J Matthew Egan; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Damien Bolton; Gregory S Jack
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  The diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric MRI for detection and localization of prostate cancer depends on the affected region.

Authors:  Martina Martins; Stefano Regusci; Stephane Rohner; Ildiko Szalay-Quinodoz; Georges-Antoine De Boccard; Louise Strom; Gerjon Hannink; Sonia Ramos-Pascual; Charles Henry Rochat
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2020-11-28

Review 4.  Targeted Anterior Gland Focal Therapy-a Novel Treatment Option for a Better Defined Disease.

Authors:  Kae Jack Tay; Arnauld Villers; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Updated clinical results of active surveillance of very-low-risk prostate cancer in Korean men: 8 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Ji Yong Ha; Teak Jun Shin; Wonho Jung; Byung Hoon Kim; Choal Hee Park; Chun Il Kim
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-04-13

6.  African American Men With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Are Candidates for Active Surveillance: The Will-Rogers Effect?

Authors:  Robert Qi; Judd Moul
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2017-08-22

7.  Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT with mpMRI for the detection of PCa in patients with a PSA level of 4-20 ng/ml before the initial biopsy.

Authors:  Yu Li; Donghui Han; Peng Wu; Jing Ren; Shuaijun Ma; Jingliang Zhang; Wei Song; Xiaoyu Lin; Dian Jiao; Shengjia Shi; Fa Yang; Jieheng Wu; Ping Meng; Weihong Wen; Fei Kang; Jing Wang; Weijun Qin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A risk model for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer based on bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging in a Japanese cohort.

Authors:  Kazushige Sakaguchi; Michikata Hayashida; Naoto Tanaka; Suguru Oka; Shinji Urakami
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Digital Rectal Examination in Stockholm3 Biomarker-based Prostate Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Joel Andersson; Thorgerdur Palsdottir; Anna Lantz; Markus Aly; Henrik Grönberg; Lars Egevad; Martin Eklund; Tobias Nordström
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-08-29

10.  TMPRSS2-ERG fusion impacts anterior tumor location in men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kosj Yamoah; Priti Lal; Shivanshu Awasthi; Arash O Naghavi; Robert J Rounbehler; Travis Gerke; Anders E Berglund; Julio M Pow-Sang; Edward M Schaeffer; Jasreman Dhillon; Jong Y Park; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 4.104

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.