Literature DB >> 26995786

Components of inhibition in autogenous- and reactive-type obsessive-compulsive disorder: Dissociation of interference control.

Jie Fan1, Wanting Liu1, Hui Lei2, Lin Cai3, Mingtian Zhong4, Jiaojiao Dong1, Cheng Zhou1, Xiongzhao Zhu5.   

Abstract

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is characterized by unwanted, intrusive thoughts (obsessions) and/or repetitive, ritualistic behaviors (compulsions). Findings related to the two components of inhibition, namely interference control and behavioral inhibition, among OCD patients have been inconsistent. It might be that this inconsistency is due to the heterogeneity among OCD cases representing multiple subtypes of OCD, such as autogenous obsessions and reactive obsessions types (AOs vs. ROs). AOs and ROs are distinguished by the category of their most disturbing obsessions. The purpose of this study was to systematically examine whether inhibition functions differ between AO and RO patients. We assessed interference control and behavioral inhibition with the emotional Stroop task (EST) and stop-signal task (SST), respectively, in 42 AOs, 55 ROs and 62 healthy controls (HCs) and event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded in a random subset of these subjects (25 AOs, 25 ROs, and 31HCs). Results showed that in the EST, AOs exhibited longer reaction times (RTs) for color-naming positive-, negative-, and neutral-valence word stimulus than both ROs and HCs, and demonstrated larger P2 and less negative N450 amplitudes than HCs and larger P3 amplitudes than ROs and HCs. In the SST, both AOs and ROs showed lengthened stop signal reaction time (SSRT) and reduced Stop-P3 amplitudes in successful inhibition (SI) trials compared to the HC group. These present findings suggest that behavioral inhibition impairment may reflect a common pathology in both the autogenous- and reactive-type OCD patients, whereas interference inhibition impairment appears to be specific to patients with autogenous obsessions. These findings strengthened the insight into the clinical heterogeneity and pathophysiology of OCD.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autogenous-reactive obsessions; Behavioral inhibition; Emotional stroop task; Event-related potentials (ERPs); Stop-signal task

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26995786     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  5 in total

1.  Distress intolerance modulation of neurophysiological markers of cognitive control during a complex go/no-go task.

Authors:  Richard J Macatee; Brian J Albanese; Kevin Clancy; Nicholas P Allan; Edward M Bernat; Jesse R Cougle; Norman B Schmidt
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2018-01

2.  Inhibition-related differences between tic-free and tic-related obsessive-compulsive disorder: evidence from the N2 and P3.

Authors:  L Kloft; A Riesel; N Kathmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Neurophysiological correlates of interference control and response inhibition processes in children and adolescents engaging in open- and closed-skill sports.

Authors:  Sebastian Ludyga; Manuel Mücke; Christian Andrä; Markus Gerber; Uwe Pühse
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 13.077

4.  Two distinct subtypes of obsessive compulsive disorder revealed by heterogeneity through discriminative analysis.

Authors:  Shaoqiang Han; Yinhuan Xu; Hui-Rong Guo; Keke Fang; Yarui Wei; Liang Liu; Junying Cheng; Yong Zhang; Jingliang Cheng
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 5.399

5.  Two distinct subtypes of obsessive compulsive disorder revealed by a framework integrating multimodal neuroimaging information.

Authors:  Shaoqiang Han; Yinhuan Xu; Hui-Rong Guo; Keke Fang; Yarui Wei; Liang Liu; Junying Cheng; Yong Zhang; Jingliang Cheng
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 5.399

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.