Literature DB >> 26995328

Impact of Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Screening Trials and Revised PSA Screening Guidelines on Rates of Prostate Biopsy and Postbiopsy Complications.

Boris Gershman1, Holly K Van Houten2, Jeph Herrin3, Daniel M Moreira1, Simon P Kim4, Nilay D Shah5, R Jeffrey Karnes6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prostate biopsy and postbiopsy complications represent important risks of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. Although landmark randomized trials and updated guidelines have challenged routine PSA screening, it is unclear whether these publications have affected rates of biopsy or postbiopsy complications.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether publication of the 2008 and 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations, the 2009 European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer and the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial, or the 2013 American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines was associated with changes in rates of biopsy or postbiopsy complications, and to identify predictors of postbiopsy complications. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This quasiexperimental study used administrative claims of 5279315 commercially insured US men aged ≥40 yr from 2005 to 2014, of whom 104584 underwent biopsy.
INTERVENTIONS: Publications on PSA screening. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Interrupted time-series analysis was used to evaluate the association of publications with rates of biopsy and 30-d complications. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of complications. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: From 2005 to 2014, biopsy rates fell 33% from 64.1 to 42.8 per 100000 person-months, with immediate reductions following the 2008 USPSTF recommendations (-10.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], -17.1 to -3.0; p<0.001), 2012 USPSTF recommendations (-13.8; 95% CI, -21.0 to -6.7; p<0 .001), and 2013 AUA guidelines (-8.8; 95% CI, -16.7 to -0.92; p=0.03). Concurrently, complication rates decreased 10% from 8.7 to 7.8 per 100000 person-months, with a reduction following the 2012 USPSTF recommendations (-2.5; 95% CI, -4.5 to -0.45; p=0.02). However, the proportion of men undergoing biopsy who experienced complications increased from 14% to 18%, driven by nonsepsis infectious complications (p<0.001). Predictors of complications included prior fluoroquinolone use (odds ratio [OR]: 1.27; 95% CI, 1.22-1.32; p<0.001), anticoagulant use (OR: 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04-1.25; p=0.004), and age ≥70 yr (OR: 1.25; 95% CI, 1.15-1.36; p<0.001). Limitations included the retrospective design.
CONCLUSIONS: Although there has been an absolute reduction in rates of biopsy and 30-d complications, the relative morbidity of biopsy continues to increase. These observations suggest a need to reduce the morbidity of biopsy. PATIENT
SUMMARY: Absolute rates of biopsy and postbiopsy complications have decreased following landmark publications about prostate-specific antigen screening; however, the relative morbidity of biopsy continues to increase.
Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Guidelines; PSA screening; Prostate biopsy; Randomized trials

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26995328     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  15 in total

Review 1.  The effect of the USPSTF PSA screening recommendation on prostate cancer incidence patterns in the USA.

Authors:  Katherine Fleshner; Sigrid V Carlsson; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Zn/Fe Ratiometric Determination of Zinc Levels in Expressed Prostatic Fluid: A Direct, Non-Invasive and Highly Accurate Screening for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Leslie C Costello; Renty B Franklin
Journal:  Acta Sci Cancer Biol       Date:  2018-10-10

3.  Should Hypoechoic Lesions on Transrectal Ultrasound Be Sampled During Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy?

Authors:  Nabeel A Shakir; M Minhaj Siddiqui; Arvin K George; Michael Kongnyuy; Richard Ho; Michele Fascelli; Maria J Merino; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Changes in Prostate Cancer Presentation Following the 2012 USPSTF Screening Statement: Observational Study in a Multispecialty Group Practice.

Authors:  Joseph Presti; Stacey Alexeeff; Brandon Horton; Stephanie Prausnitz; Andrew L Avins
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Using Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Scores to Select an Optimal Prostate Biopsy Method: A Secondary Analysis of the Trio Study.

Authors:  Michael Ahdoot; Amir H Lebastchi; Lori Long; Andrew R Wilbur; Patrick T Gomella; Sherif Mehralivand; Michael A Daneshvar; Nitin K Yerram; Luke P O'Connor; Alex Z Wang; Sandeep Gurram; Jonathan Bloom; M Minhaj Siddiqui; W Marston Linehan; Maria Merino; Peter L Choyke; Paul Pinsky; Howard Parnes; Joanna H Shih; Baris Turkbey; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2021-04-10

6.  Development and internal validation of PI-RADs v2-based model for clinically significant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Na Zeng; Yi Chen Zhu; Yang Xin Rui Huang; Qiang Guo; Ye Tian
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.754

7.  US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses.

Authors:  Glen Gejerman; Patrick Ciccone; Martin Goldstein; Vincent Lanteri; Burton Schlecker; John Sanzone; Michael Esposito; Sergey Rome; Michael Ciccone; Eric Margolis; Robert Simon; Yijun Guo; Sri-Ram Pentakota; Hossein Sadeghi-Nejad
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-11-02

8.  Changes in the outcome of prostate biopsies after preventive task force recommendation against prostate-specific antigen screening.

Authors:  Ahmed S Zakaria; Alice Dragomir; Fadi Brimo; Wassim Kassouf; Simon Tanguay; Armen Aprikian
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 2.264

9.  Liquid Biopsy Potential Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Jochen Neuhaus; Bo Yang
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-21

10.  Clinically significant Prostate Cancer diagnosed using a urinary molecular biomarker-based risk score: two case reports.

Authors:  Pieter Minnee; Daphne Hessels; Jack A Schalken; Wim Van Criekinge
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.