Literature DB >> 26995281

Track: A randomized controlled trial of a digital health obesity treatment intervention for medically vulnerable primary care patients.

Perry Foley1, Dori Steinberg2, Erica Levine3, Sandy Askew4, Bryan C Batch5, Elaine M Puleo6, Laura P Svetkey7, Hayden B Bosworth8, Abigail DeVries9, Heather Miranda10, Gary G Bennett11.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Obesity continues to disproportionately affect medically vulnerable populations. Digital health interventions may be effective for delivering obesity treatment in low-resource primary care settings.
METHODS: Track is a 12-month randomized controlled trial of a digital health weight loss intervention in a community health center system. Participants are 351 obese men and women aged 21 to 65years with an obesity-related comorbidity. Track participants are randomized to usual primary care or to a 12-month intervention consisting of algorithm-generated tailored behavior change goals, self-monitoring via mobile technologies, daily self-weighing using a network-connected scale, skills training materials, 18 counseling phone calls with a Track coach, and primary care provider counseling. Participants are followed over 12months, with study visits at baseline, 6, and 12months. Anthropometric data, blood pressure, fasting lipids, glucose and HbA1C and self-administered surveys are collected. Follow-up data will be collected from the medical record at 24months.
RESULTS: Participants are 68% female and on average 50.7years old with a mean BMI of 35.9kg/m(2). Participants are mainly black (54%) or white (33%); 12.5% are Hispanic. Participants are mostly employed and low-income. Over 20% of the sample has hypertension, diabetes and hyperlipidemia. Almost 27% of participants currently smoke and almost 20% score above the clinical threshold for depression.
CONCLUSIONS: Track utilizes an innovative, digital health approach to reduce obesity and chronic disease risk among medically vulnerable adults in the primary care setting. Baseline characteristics reflect a socioeconomically disadvantaged, high-risk patient population in need of evidence-based obesity treatment.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Digital health; Minority health; Mobile health; Obesity; Primary care; Rural health; Weight loss

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26995281      PMCID: PMC4885789          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  63 in total

1.  A descriptive study of individuals successful at long-term maintenance of substantial weight loss.

Authors:  M L Klem; R R Wing; M T McGuire; H M Seagle; J O Hill
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Self-efficacy in relation to eating behaviour among obese and non-obese women.

Authors:  R M Richman; G T Loughnan; A M Droulers; K S Steinbeck; I D Caterson
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2001-06

Review 3.  Dietary and lifestyle interventions for weight management in adults from minority ethnic/non-White groups: a systematic review.

Authors:  G Osei-Assibey; I Kyrou; Y Adi; S Kumar; K Matyka
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 9.213

Review 4.  Treatment of obesity in primary care practice in the United States: a systematic review.

Authors:  Adam Gilden Tsai; Thomas A Wadden
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.

Authors:  A Bandura
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Prospective association between obesity and depression: evidence from the Alameda County Study.

Authors:  R E Roberts; S Deleger; W J Strawbridge; G A Kaplan
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2003-04

7.  Interpersonal processes of care in diverse populations.

Authors:  A L Stewart; A Nápoles-Springer; E J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.911

8.  Monitoring weight daily blocks the freshman weight gain: a model for combating the epidemic of obesity.

Authors:  D A Levitsky; J Garay; M Nausbaum; L Neighbors; D M Dellavalle
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.095

9.  Sociocultural methods in the Jackson Heart Study: conceptual and descriptive overview.

Authors:  Thomas J Payne; Sharon B Wyatt; Thomas H Mosley; Patricia M Dubbert; Mary Lou Guiterrez-Mohammed; Rosie L Calvin; Herman A Taylor; David R Williams
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.847

10.  Prevalence and trends in overweight among US children and adolescents, 1999-2000.

Authors:  Cynthia L Ogden; Katherine M Flegal; Margaret D Carroll; Clifford L Johnson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-10-09       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  22 in total

1.  Provider Counseling and Weight Loss Outcomes in a Primary Care-Based Digital Obesity Treatment.

Authors:  Megan McVay; Dori Steinberg; Sandy Askew; Gary G Bennett
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Can Electronic Health Records Validly Estimate the Effects of Health System Interventions Aimed at Controlling Body Weight?

Authors:  Kristie Kusibab; John A Gallis; Joseph R Egger; Maren K Olsen; Sandy Askew; Dori M Steinberg; Gary Bennett
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2020-09-27       Impact factor: 5.002

3.  The Effect of a Digital Behavioral Weight Loss Intervention on Adherence to the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Dietary Pattern in Medically Vulnerable Primary Care Patients: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Dori Steinberg; Melissa Kay; Jasmine Burroughs; Laura P Svetkey; Gary G Bennett
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.910

4.  An Integrated Conceptual Framework of Behavioral Intervention Technologies to Promote Healthcare Utilization Among Socially-Marginalized Populations in the United States.

Authors:  Chen Zhang; Shelby Przybylek; Amy Braksmajer; Yu Liu
Journal:  J Nurs Stud Patient Care       Date:  2022-05-06

5.  Comparison of weight loss data collected by research technicians versus electronic medical records: the PROPEL trial.

Authors:  Peter T Katzmarzyk; Emily F Mire; Corby K Martin; Robert L Newton; John W Apolzan; Eboni G Price-Haywood; Kara D Denstel; Ronald Horswell; San T Chu; William D Johnson
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 5.551

6.  Implementation of an At-home Blood Pressure Measurement Protocol in a Hypertension Management Clinical Trial During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Hailey N Miller; Miriam B Berger; Sandy Askew; Elizabeth Trefney; Crystal Tyson; Laura Svetkey; Gary G Bennett; Dori M Steinberg
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Effectiveness of an App and Provider Counseling for Obesity Treatment in Primary Care.

Authors:  Gary G Bennett; Dori Steinberg; Sandy Askew; Erica Levine; Perry Foley; Bryan C Batch; Laura P Svetkey; Hayden B Bosworth; Elaine M Puleo; Ashley Brewer; Abigail DeVries; Heather Miranda
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Unravelling 'low-resource settings': a systematic scoping review with qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Chanel van Zyl; Marelise Badenhorst; Susan Hanekom; Martin Heine
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-06

9.  Comparing Self-Monitoring Strategies for Weight Loss in a Smartphone App: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Michele L Patel; Christina M Hopkins; Taylor L Brooks; Gary G Bennett
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 10.  Medical Internet of Things and Big Data in Healthcare.

Authors:  Dimiter V Dimitrov
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2016-07-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.