Literature DB >> 26995141

Screening probiotic strains for safety: Evaluation of virulence and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci from healthy Chinese infants.

Fen Zhang1, Meiling Jiang1, Cuixiang Wan1, Xiaoyan Chen2, Xiaoyong Chen2, Xueying Tao3, Nagendra P Shah4, Hua Wei1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of enterococci isolated from Chinese infants and screen out potential probiotic candidates. One hundred eight strains were isolated from feces of 34 healthy infants, and 38 strains of Enterococcus spp. were categorized as follows: E. faecalis (22), E. faecium (10), E. hirae (3), E. durans (2), and E. casseliflavus (1). Of these, 72.7% of E. faecalis came from infants delivered by cesarean and 62.5% of E. faecium from infants delivered vaginally. For safety evaluation of strains, we determined presence of virulence genes; production of hemolysin, gelatinase, and biofilm; and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci. Six out of 14 virulence genes were detected with a distribution of gelE (26.3%), cylA (39.4%), esp (15.8%), efaA (63.2%), asa1 (50.0%), and ace (50.0%). In phenotype analysis, 36.8% of the strains exhibited positive hemolytic activity and 17.5% were positive for production of gelatinase. Results of antimicrobial susceptibility showed that different percentages of the strains were resistant to ciprofloxacin (5.2%), vancomycin (7.8%), rifampicin (10.5%), erythromycin (52.6%), and gentamycin (52.6%); remarkably, none of the strains were resistant to ampicillin or chloramphenicol. In total, 10 strains, including 6 E. faecium, which are free of virulence determinants and sensitive to common antimicrobial agents (e.g., ampicillin and vancomycin), were further assessed for their probiotic properties. All strains survived well in simulated gastric fluid and intestinal tract, with maximum reductions of 0.600 and 0.887 log cfu/mL, respectively. Six strains of E. faecium could resist 0.3 to 1.0% bile salt, of which E. faecium WEFA23 presented the highest growth (75.06%) at 1.0% bile salt. All strains showed bile salt hydrolase activity on glycodeoxycholic acid, but only 3 of E. faecium showed activity on taurodeoxycholic acid. These results deliver useful information on the safety of enterococci in infants in China, and provide a protocol to screen probiotics for absence of virulence and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci.
Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antibiotic susceptibility; enterococci; probiotic; safety; virulence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26995141     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2015-10690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  5 in total

1.  Protection of surface layer protein from Enterococcus faecium WEFA23 against Listeria monocytogenes CMCC54007 infection by modulating intestinal permeability and immunity.

Authors:  Yao He; Qin Yang; Linlin Tian; Zhihong Zhang; Liang Qiu; Xueying Tao; Hua Wei
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  A potentially probiotic strain of Enterococcus faecalis from human milk that is avirulent, antibiotic sensitive, and nonbreaching of the gut barrier.

Authors:  Jasia Anjum; Arsalan Zaidi; Kim Barrett; Muhammad Tariq
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.552

3.  Enterococcus durans EP1 a Promising Anti-inflammatory Probiotic Able to Stimulate sIgA and to Increase Faecalibacterium prausnitzii Abundance.

Authors:  Paula Carasi; Silvia María Racedo; Claudine Jacquot; Anne Marie Elie; María de Los Ángeles Serradell; María C Urdaci
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 7.561

4.  Probiotic Potential Analysis and Safety Evaluation of Enterococcus durans A8-1 Isolated From a Healthy Chinese Infant.

Authors:  Yi Zhou; Lu Shi; Juan Wang; Jia Yuan; Jin Liu; Lijuan Liu; Rong Da; Yue Cheng; Bei Han
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Evaluating the Safety of Potential Probiotic Enterococcus durans KLDS6.0930 Using Whole Genome Sequencing and Oral Toxicity Study.

Authors:  Bailiang Li; Meng Zhan; Smith E Evivie; Da Jin; Li Zhao; Sathi Chowdhury; Shuvan K Sarker; Guicheng Huo; Fei Liu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 5.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.