Literature DB >> 26994200

Egg production and welfare of laying hens kept in different housing systems (conventional, enriched cage, and free range).

B Yilmaz Dikmen1, A İpek2, Ü Şahan2, M Petek3, A Sözcü2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare egg production performance and welfare traits of laying hens kept in conventional cage (CC), enriched cage (EC), and free range (FR). Lohmann Brown laying hens (n = 480 with 160 per housing type) were studied across a production cycle from placement at 17 wk until depopulation at 66 wk. The hens were randomly allocated into cages or pens of housing system groups; within each system there were four replicates with 40 hens in each pen or cage. The hen day egg production (P = 0.037), feed intake (FI) (P < 0.001), egg mass (EM) (P < 0.001), and dirty egg ratio of hens were higher in the FR system but similar in the CC and EC systems. The highest mortality ratio was found in EC system hens (P = 0.020). The best feather score was found in FR system hens (P < 0.001). The worse body wound score was found in EC system hens (P = 0.038). On the other hand, the worse bumble foot and footpad lesions were found in FR system hens (P < 0.001). The highest tibia breaking strength was found in FR system hens compared with in CC and EC system hens (P < 0.001). The highest Heterophil/Lymphocyte ( H/L: ) ratio was found in CC system hens (P = 0.006) but the blood phosphorus ( P: ) level was higher in FR system hens (P = 0.013). The tonic immobility, blood glucose, total cholesterol, triglyceride, and Ca values of hens were found to be similar in all systems (P > 0.05). The hens in the FR system had additional space for optimum comfort and better feather and bone traits, but the dirty egg ratio, feed consumption, and foot lesions were higher than in CC and EC systems.
© 2016 Poultry Science Association Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conventional cage; egg production; enriched cage; free range; welfare

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26994200     DOI: 10.3382/ps/pew082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  15 in total

1.  Transcriptome changes provide genetic insights into the effects of rearing systems on chicken welfare and product quality.

Authors:  Hai Xiang; Siyu Chen; Hui Zhang; Xu Zhu; Dan Wang; Huagui Liu; Jikun Wang; Tao Yin; Langqing Liu; Minghua Kong; Jian Zhang; Hua Li; Xingbo Zhao
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  The Acceptability of Food Policies.

Authors:  Romain Espinosa; Anis Nassar
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Comparative Analysis of the Gut Microbial Composition and Meat Flavor of Two Chicken Breeds in Different Rearing Patterns.

Authors:  Jing Sun; Yan Wang; Nianzhen Li; Hang Zhong; Hengyong Xu; Qing Zhu; Yiping Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Effects of the housing environment and laying hen strain on tibia and femur bone properties of different laying phases of Hy-Line hens.

Authors:  Milan K Sharma; Dima White; Chongxiao Chen; Woo K Kim; Pratima Adhikari
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Effects of housing systems on keel bone damage and egg quality of laying ‎hens.

Authors:  Anna Dedousi; Mirjana Đukić Stojčić; Evangelia Sossidou
Journal:  Vet Res Forum       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 1.054

Review 6.  The Relationships between Damaging Behaviours and Health in Laying Hens.

Authors:  Virginie Michel; Jutta Berk; Nadya Bozakova; Jerine van der Eijk; Inma Estevez; Teodora Mircheva; Renata Relic; T Bas Rodenburg; Evangelia N Sossidou; Maryse Guinebretière
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.231

7.  Free Dietary Choice and Free-Range Rearing Improve the Product Quality, Gait Score, and Microbial Richness of Chickens.

Authors:  Siyu Chen; Hai Xiang; Xu Zhu; Hui Zhang; Dan Wang; Huagui Liu; Jikun Wang; Tao Yin; Langqing Liu; Minghua Kong; Jian Zhang; Shin-Ichiro Ogura; Xingbo Zhao
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Effects of a two-phase mixed color lighting program using light-emitting diode lights on layer chickens during brooding and rearing periods.

Authors:  Yongxiang Wei; Weichao Zheng; Baoming Li; Qin Tong; Haipeng Shi
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  The effect of an enriched laying environment on welfare, performance, and egg quality parameters of laying hens kept in a cage system.

Authors:  Damian Konkol; Ewa Popiela; Mariusz Korczyński
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Identification of reliable reference genes for expression studies in the magnum of laying hens housed in cage and cage-free systems.

Authors:  Roy Rodríguez-Hernández; Edgar O Oviedo-Rondón; Iang S Rondón-Barragán
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2021-05-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.