Literature DB >> 26994000

Mentoring perception and academic performance: an Academic Health Science Centre survey.

Thanos Athanasiou1, Vanash Patel1, George Garas1, Hutan Ashrafian1, Kunal Shetty1, Nick Sevdalis2, Pietro Panzarasa3, Ara Darzi1, Sotirios Paroutis4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the association between professors' self-perception of mentoring skills and their academic performance.
DESIGN: Two hundred and fifteen professors from Imperial College London, the first Academic Health Science Centre (AHSC) in the UK, were surveyed. The instrument adopted was the Mentorship Skills Self-Assessment Survey. Statement scores were aggregated to provide a score for each shared core, mentor-specific and mentee-specific skill. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to evaluate their relationship with quantitative measures of academic performance (publications, citations and h-index).
RESULTS: There were 104 professors that responded (response rate 48%). There were no statistically significant negative correlations between any mentoring statement and any performance measure. In contrast, several mentoring survey items were positively correlated with academic performance. The total survey score for frequency of application of mentoring skills had a statistically significant positive association with number of publications (B=0.012, SE=0.004, p=0.006), as did the frequency of acquiring mentors with number of citations (B=1.572, SE=0.702, p=0.030). Building trust and managing risks had a statistically significant positive association with h-index (B=0.941, SE=0.460, p=0.047 and B=0.613, SE=0.287, p=0.038, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the view that mentoring is associated with high academic performance. Importantly, it suggests that frequent use of mentoring skills and quality of mentoring have positive effects on academic performance. Formal mentoring programmes should be considered a fundamental part of all AHSCs' configuration. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Keywords:  EDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training); MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26994000     DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  3 in total

1.  Network analysis of surgical innovation: Measuring value and the virality of diffusion in robotic surgery.

Authors:  George Garas; Isabella Cingolani; Pietro Panzarasa; Ara Darzi; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Bridging the research-practice gap in healthcare: a rapid review of research translation centres in England and Australia.

Authors:  Tracy Robinson; Cate Bailey; Heather Morris; Prue Burns; Angela Melder; Charlotte Croft; Dmitrios Spyridonidis; Halyo Bismantara; Helen Skouteris; Helena Teede
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2020-10-09

3.  Championing women working in health across regional and rural Australia - a new dual-mentorship model.

Authors:  Teresa M Wozniak; Esther Miller; Kevin J Williams; Amelia Pickering
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.463

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.