Literature DB >> 26993816

Barriers to Innovation in Urban Wastewater Utilities: Attitudes of Managers in California.

Michael Kiparsky1,2, Barton H Thompson3,4, Christian Binz5,4, David L Sedlak6,4, Lars Tummers7,8, Bernhard Truffer9,10,4.   

Abstract

In many regions of the world, urban water systems will need to transition into fundamentally different forms to address current stressors and meet impending challenges-faster innovation will need to be part of these transitions. To assess the innovation deficit in urban water organizations and to identify means for supporting innovation, we surveyed wastewater utility managers in California. Our results reveal insights about the attitudes towards innovation among decision makers, and how perceptions at the level of individual managers might create disincentives for experimentation. Although managers reported feeling relatively unhindered organizationally, they also spend less time on innovation than they feel they should. The most frequently reported barriers to innovation included cost and financing; risk and risk aversion; and regulatory compliance. Considering these results in the context of prior research on innovation systems, we conclude that collective action may be required to address underinvestment in innovation.

Keywords:  Decision-making; Innovation; Risk; Technology; Wastewater

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26993816     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0685-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  9 in total

1.  Feeling at risk matters: water managers and the decision to use forecasts.

Authors:  Robert E O'Connor; Brent Yarnal; Kirstin Dow; Christine L Jocoy; Gregory J Carbone
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Self-other agreement in job performance ratings: a meta-analytic test of a process model.

Authors:  Heike Heidemeier; Klaus Moser
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2009-03

3.  A framework for understanding risk perception, explored from the perspective of the water practitioner.

Authors:  Meredith Frances Dobbie; Rebekah Ruth Brown
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  The Innovation Deficit in Urban Water: The Need for an Integrated Perspective on Institutions, Organizations, and Technology.

Authors:  Michael Kiparsky; David L Sedlak; Barton H Thompson; Bernhard Truffer
Journal:  Environ Eng Sci       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.907

5.  Introduction of new process technology into the wastewater treatment sector.

Authors:  Denny S Parker
Journal:  Water Environ Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.946

Review 6.  Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries?

Authors:  I T Coyne
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 7.  Recovery of freshwater from wastewater: upgrading process configurations to maximize energy recovery and minimize residuals.

Authors:  Yaniv D Scherson; Craig S Criddle
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Comparative perceptions of driver ability--a confirmation and expansion.

Authors:  I A McCormick; F H Walkey; D E Green
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  1986-06

Review 9.  Taking the "waste" out of "wastewater" for human water security and ecosystem sustainability.

Authors:  Stanley B Grant; Jean-Daniel Saphores; David L Feldman; Andrew J Hamilton; Tim D Fletcher; Perran L M Cook; Michael Stewardson; Brett F Sanders; Lisa A Levin; Richard F Ambrose; Ana Deletic; Rebekah Brown; Sunny C Jiang; Diego Rosso; William J Cooper; Ivan Marusic
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

  9 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic nanoadsorbents for micropollutant removal in real water treatment: a review.

Authors:  Ackmez Mudhoo; Mika Sillanpää
Journal:  Environ Chem Lett       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 9.027

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.