Afferents and efferents of the vestibular nuclei: the necessity of context-specific interpretation.

A synopsis of physiological and anatomical results is presented that leads to the conclusion that experimental data have to be interpreted in a context meaningful for the system investigated. For example, since there is an obvious spatial relationship between semicircular canals and extraocular muscles, the interdependence between the three-neurone-arc circuitry, and vestibular and visual signals follows quite naturally from a common geometry inherent in the sensory and motor periphery. It is emphasized that signals related to compensatory eye movements have to be interpreted within a vestibular/eye muscle frame of reference. By the same argument, when dealing with the head-neck movement system, the appropriate reference frame will have to be applied to arrive at a meaningful interpretation of related sensorimotor functions. Thus, in general terms, each system has to be interpreted within its own meaningful biological context.