Literature DB >> 26993176

Residual rates of reflux and obstruction and their correlation to post-thrombotic syndrome in a randomized study on catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis.

Ylva Haig1, Tone Enden2, Carl-Erik Slagsvold3, Leiv Sandvik4, Per Morten Sandset5, Nils Einar Kløw6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) often results in venous valvular incompetence and incomplete recanalization, followed by post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Treatment with additional catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) in patients with an iliofemoral DVT has been shown to reduce the frequency of PTS. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of CDT on venous reflux and patency and to identify possible predictors for the development of PTS.
METHODS: Open, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Patients (18-75 years) with a first-time iliofemoral DVT were randomized to receive conventional treatment with anticoagulation and compression stockings or CDT in addition to conventional treatment. Follow-up after 6 and 24 months included ultrasound and air plethysmography for evaluation of venous reflux and patency. PTS was assessed with the Villalta score. Possible predictors of PTS were analyzed in multivariate logistic regression models.
RESULTS: Following additional CDT, deep venous reflux was detected in 65.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 54.8-74.2) of patients at 6 months and 66.7% (95% CI, 56.4-75.6) at 24 months. The absolute risk reduction of deep venous reflux was 11.9% (95% CI, 1.1-24.9) after 6 months and 16.5% (95% CI, 4.2-28.8) after 24 months in the CDT arm compared with controls. Correspondingly, venous patency was regained in 65.9% (95% CI, 55.5-75.0) of patients at 6 months and 74.7% (95% CI, 64.9-82.6) after 24 months. Patency was regained in 18.5% (95% CI, 4.4-32.6) more patients after 6 months and 15.1% (95% CI, 1.8-28.5) more patients after 24 months compared with controls. Independent of treatment allocation, patients with fully recanalized and competent deep veins at 6-month follow-up had a 40.5% (95% CI, 26.4-54.7) absolute risk reduction of developing PTS compared with patients with abnormal vein assessment. Reflux and lack of patency at 6 months were found to be independent predictors of PTS development in patients treated with CDT (odds ratio, 8.3; 95% CI, 2.6-26.8 for patients with reflux, and odds ratio, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.06-0.49 for patients with patency).
CONCLUSIONS: Additional CDT improved patency and reduced reflux. Both parameters were found to be strong predictors of PTS in patients treated with CDT. Noninvasive vein assessments of patency and reflux may be helpful to identify and monitor patients at high risk of PTS. Our findings provide evidence for the importance of early recanalization with CDT for acute iliofemoral DVT.
Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 26993176     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2013.10.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord


  8 in total

Review 1.  The case for catheter-directed thrombolysis in selected patients with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Thita Chiasakul; Adam Cuker
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-07-24

2.  Correlation between Post-Procedure Residual Thrombus and Clinical Outcome in Deep Vein Thrombosis Patients Receiving Pharmacomechanical Thrombolysis in a Multicenter Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Mahmood K Razavi; Amber Salter; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Samantha Lancia; Susan R Kahn; Ido Weinberg; Clive Kearon; Ezana M Azene; Nilesh H Patel; Suresh Vedantham
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.464

3.  Relationships between the use of pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis, sonographic findings, and clinical outcomes in patients with acute proximal DVT: Results from the ATTRACT Multicenter Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Ido Weinberg; Suresh Vedantham; Amber Salter; Gail Hadley; Noor Al-Hammadi; Clive Kearon; Jim A Julian; Mahmood K Razavi; Heather L Gornik; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Anthony J Comerota; Andrei L Kindzelski; Robert M Schainfeld; John F Angle; Sanjay Misra; Jonathan A Schor; Darren Hurst; Michael R Jaff
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 3.239

Review 4.  Thrombolysis for acute deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Lorna Watson; Cathryn Broderick; Matthew P Armon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-10

5.  The Open Vein Hypothesis and Postthrombotic Syndrome: Not Dead Yet.

Authors:  Aaron W Aday; Joshua A Beckman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Thrombolytic strategies versus standard anticoagulation for acute deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb.

Authors:  Cathryn Broderick; Lorna Watson; Matthew P Armon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-01-19

Review 7.  Catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis: 2021 update.

Authors:  Samuel Z Goldhaber; Elizabeth A Magnuson; Khaja M Chinnakondepalli; David J Cohen; Suresh Vedantham
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Predictors of long-term post-thrombotic syndrome following high proximal deep vein thrombosis: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Marit Engeseth; Tone Enden; Per Morten Sandset; Hilde Skuterud Wik
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2021-01-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.