Rena C Moon1, Derek Stephenson1, Nelson A Royall1, Andre F Teixeira1, Muhammad A Jawad2. 1. Bariatric and Laparoscopy Center, Orando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL, USA. 2. Bariatric and Laparoscopy Center, Orando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL, USA. muhammad.jawad@orlandohealth.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Currently, sleeve gastrectomy is most commonly performed laparoscopically. However, robot-assisted approach for sleeve gastrectomy is increasing in number among bariatric surgeons. The aim of our study is to compare perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted (RA-LSG) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). METHODS: Between June 2008 and December 2014, 647 patients underwent LSG and RA-LSG at our institution. A retrospective review was performed for 379 LSG and 268 R-LSG patients, noting the outcomes and complications of the procedure. RESULTS: The first 100 LSG and RA-LSG cases were separated to reflect the influence of learning curve. Mean length of hospital stay (LOS) was longer in RA-LSG patients at 1.3 ± 0.6 days (range, 1-4), while it was 1.1 ± 0.3 days (range, 1-2) in LSG patients. Thirty-day readmission rate was similar in both groups, 5.0 % in LSG and 6.0 % in RA-LSG group. One mortality (1.0 %) occurred in the RA-LSG group. In patients after 100 cases, mean LOS was still longer in RA-LSG patients at 1.7 ± 1.8 days (range, 1-21), while it was 1.2 ± 0.5 days (range, 1-5) LSG patients. Thirty-day readmission rate and 30-day reoperation rate did not show a significant difference between the two groups. Overall leak rate was 3.2 % (n = 9) in LSG group, and 1.9 % (n = 5) in RA-LSG group, and the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed similar 30-day readmission and reoperation rate between LSG and RA-LSG during the learning curve and after the proficiency has been achieved.
BACKGROUND: Currently, sleeve gastrectomy is most commonly performed laparoscopically. However, robot-assisted approach for sleeve gastrectomy is increasing in number among bariatric surgeons. The aim of our study is to compare perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted (RA-LSG) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). METHODS: Between June 2008 and December 2014, 647 patients underwent LSG and RA-LSG at our institution. A retrospective review was performed for 379 LSG and 268 R-LSG patients, noting the outcomes and complications of the procedure. RESULTS: The first 100 LSG and RA-LSG cases were separated to reflect the influence of learning curve. Mean length of hospital stay (LOS) was longer in RA-LSG patients at 1.3 ± 0.6 days (range, 1-4), while it was 1.1 ± 0.3 days (range, 1-2) in LSG patients. Thirty-day readmission rate was similar in both groups, 5.0 % in LSG and 6.0 % in RA-LSG group. One mortality (1.0 %) occurred in the RA-LSG group. In patients after 100 cases, mean LOS was still longer in RA-LSG patients at 1.7 ± 1.8 days (range, 1-21), while it was 1.2 ± 0.5 days (range, 1-5) LSG patients. Thirty-day readmission rate and 30-day reoperation rate did not show a significant difference between the two groups. Overall leak rate was 3.2 % (n = 9) in LSG group, and 1.9 % (n = 5) in RA-LSG group, and the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed similar 30-day readmission and reoperation rate between LSG and RA-LSG during the learning curve and after the proficiency has been achieved.
Authors: Manish Parikh; Reda Issa; Aileen McCrillis; John K Saunders; Aku Ude-Welcome; Michel Gagner Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Ramon Vilallonga; José Manuel Fort; Oscar Gonzalez; Enric Caubet; Angeles Boleko; Karl John Neff; Manel Armengol Journal: Minim Invasive Surg Date: 2012-09-17
Authors: Reza Fazl Alizadeh; Shiri Li; Colette S Inaba; Andreea I Dinicu; Marcelo W Hinojosa; Brian R Smith; Michael J Stamos; Ninh T Nguyen Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-08-20 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: William C Bennett; Jihye Park; Murphy Mostellar; Ian C Garbarine; Manuel E Sanchez-Casalongue; Timothy M Farrell; Randal Zhou Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2022-06-14 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Jan Henrik Beckmann; Anne-Sophie Mehdorn; Jan-Niclas Kersebaum; Witigo von Schönfels; Terbish Taivankhuu; Matthias Laudes; Jan-Hendrik Egberts; Thomas Becker Journal: Visc Med Date: 2020-05-15