Literature DB >> 26992659

Primary and secondary effects of real-time feedback to reduce vertical loading rate during running.

M Baggaley1, R W Willy1, S A Meardon1.   

Abstract

Gait modifications are often proposed to reduce average loading rate (AVLR) during running. While many modifications may reduce AVLR, little work has investigated secondary gait changes. Thirty-two rearfoot runners [16M, 16F, 24.7 (3.3) years, 22.72 (3.01) kg/m2 , >16 km/week] ran at a self-selected speed (2.9 ± 0.3 m/s) on an instrumented treadmill, while 3D mechanics were calculated via real-time data acquisition. Real-time visual feedback was provided in a randomized order to cue a forefoot strike (FFS), a minimum 7.5% decrease in step length, or a minimum 15% reduction in AVLR. AVLR was reduced by FFS (mean difference = 26.4 BW/s; 95% CI = 20.1, 32.7; P < 0.001), shortened step length (8.4 BW/s; 95% CI = 2.9, 14.0; P = 0.004), and cues to reduce AVLR (14.9 BW/s; 95% CI = 10.2, 19.6; P < 0.001). FFS, shortened step length, and cues to reduce AVLR all reduced eccentric knee joint work per km [(-48.2 J/kg*m; 95% CI = -58.1, -38.3; P < 0.001), (-35.5 J/kg*m; 95% CI = -42.4, 28.6; P < 0.001), (-23.1 J/kg*m; 95% CI = -33.3, -12.9; P < 0.001)]. However, FFS and cues to reduce AVLR also increased eccentric ankle joint work per km [(54.49 J/kg*m; 95% CI = 45.3, 63.7; P < 0.001), (9.20 J/kg*m; 95% CI = 1.7, 16.7; P = 0.035)]. Potentially injurious secondary effects associated with FFS and cues to reduce AVLR may undermine their clinical utility. Alternatively, a shortened step length resulted in small reductions in AVLR, without any potentially injurious secondary effects.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Tibial stress fracture; cadence; foot strike; gait modification

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26992659     DOI: 10.1111/sms.12670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports        ISSN: 0905-7188            Impact factor:   4.221


  7 in total

1.  ALTERING CADENCE OR VERTICAL OSCILLATION DURING RUNNING: EFFECTS ON RUNNING RELATED INJURY FACTORS.

Authors:  Douglas Adams; Federico Pozzi; Richard W Willy; Anthony Carrol; Joseph Zeni
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-08

Review 2.  Preventing Bone Stress Injuries in Runners with Optimal Workload.

Authors:  Stuart J Warden; W Brent Edwards; Richard W Willy
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 5.163

3.  Inter-Individual Variability in The Joint Negative Work During Running.

Authors:  Satoru Hashizume; Hiroaki Hobara; Yoshiyuki Kobayashi; Mitsunori Tada; Masaaki Mochimaru
Journal:  Sports Med Int Open       Date:  2018-11-23

4.  Music-based biofeedback to reduce tibial shock in over-ground running: a proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Pieter Van den Berghe; Valerio Lorenzoni; Rud Derie; Joren Six; Joeri Gerlo; Marc Leman; Dirk De Clercq
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Men's and Women's World Championship Marathon Performances and Changes With Fatigue Are Not Explained by Kinematic Differences Between Footstrike Patterns.

Authors:  Brian Hanley; Athanassios Bissas; Stéphane Merlino
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2020-08-06

6.  Injury Prevention, Safe Training Techniques, Rehabilitation, and Return to Sport in Trail Runners.

Authors:  Heather K Vincent; Michael Brownstein; Kevin R Vincent
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-01-28

7.  The Coupling of Stride Length and Foot Strike in Running.

Authors:  Missy Thompson; Kristine Hoffman; Lindsay Blythe; Rachel Hasler; Megan Longtain
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-04-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.